1
Drifter995
Neko//Night
cruz737 wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
I'm on my phone so I can't be arsed splitting it up. Waaay too much effort to do, so dot points is the go
-Yes
-No. Why did you bring it up then?
-Again, why post it then?
I didn't bring it up. My initial post was just saying, "hey this things kinda does exist but in a completely different form". Also again, if you're going to insist that's me advocating/campaigning/championing a cause, you're going to have to explain why. It was nothing more than acknowledging of a fact.
My initial post was also a point saying that there is no point to refuse to bathe in privileged culture. Not not being avle to bathe like you're now saying I said, which is related to the post you replied to.
Again, give me a reason why you posted your point other than to point out bathing is impossible for certain parts of the world, which is irrelevant considering the post you quoted was about a snowflake being a lazy fuck and not showering for the sake of it. Not whether or bot people outside of privilege can shower.
cruz737 wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
-I'm literally not. Allow me to spell out what you are taking so far out of context that you are crying externally; Regardless of what happens in third world countries, (this means, it doesn't matter what happens to the less fortunate, to clear that up) it's just an excuse to be lazy and smell (it's just an excuse for the fortunate to ve lazy and smell.)
You talked about 3 groups and then one explicitly. There is no taking anything out of context if you didn't convey your message properly.
No, I was talking about one group the entire time. Again, read it again and again till you figure it out. I conveyed my message fine. You're nitpicking at something that doesn't exist for the sake of it.
cruz737 wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
The first three groups bit was saying bathing is a thing meaning there is no excuse for not bathing in a first or second world country which you are clearly responding to
1.You mentioned 3rd world countries too.
2. You said bathing was a thing in those 3 groups, that again doesn't automatically mean it's accessible in all. Only an idiot would believe that everyone in 1st and 2nd world countries have every single thing they need available to them. Those 2 are not directly related.
The US despite being a "1st world country" has a pretty big homeless population and unfortunately there's a big with mental illnesses/issues. I don't think anyone rational would tell them there's not reason for them not to be bathed/hygenic because they live in a 1st world country.(inb4 that's not my point because it is.)
1. No shit sherlock
2. No shit. I said refusing. Regardless there are people in every place that can't get access to water to bathe.
Again, my point isn't that people living in a 1st world country should be hygienic full stop. I'm saying there is no point to refuse to be hygienic. You know what that means, yeah? Being given the opportunity and denying it? Because I am started to doubt if you can read at all from how you're responding, taking things out of context and putting words in mouth. Either that or you have no case and are relying on those tactics to try and use morality to get some form of highground, by pretending I have no morals. Clever.
cruz737 wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
interpreting something so goddamn straight foward.
Also, no, I'm not neg repping you. I'm just sitting here trying to get reception to reply
I'm not going to assume you're not retarded, if that's what you're asking from me. You made a blatant mistake and then you try to rationalize it as something even stupider.
Also I don't care about -reps. No one should be egotistical enough to get worked over an anonymous disapproval.
No, I'm not. I'm asking you to stop being retarded. Even if the wording on ONE sentence (which it's not. It's pretty clear what I'm saying. You are nitpicking at nothing.) Was wrong, it doesn't change my argument, and I haven't tried to rationalize it with something stupider. It's literally the same argument you dud.
Good. I was worried for a second you'd actually get mad at me for the neg reps and use it to show how butthurt I am over your terrible argument full of lack of eyes and terrible twists on what was written. It would tie in well with your posts so far.
Replies are going to get slower from here. Lack of reception and time for a bit.
Also split it up, because I realised it made it easier to re-read and make sure I don't lose my train of thought
-1
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Drifter995 wrote...
My initial post was also a point saying that there is no point to refuse to bathe in privileged culture.
Which again is completely different from my first post.
Drifter995 wrote...
Either that or you have no case and are relying on those tactics to try and use morality to get some form of highground, by pretending I have no morals. Clever.Drifter995 wrote...
The first three groups bit was saying bathing is a thing meaning there is no excuse for not bathing in a first or second world country which you are clearly responding to
>Don't argue on what I say!
Well if you say so.
The best way I can see the post rationalized is if I completely ignore the first half of the post or the very least first 2 sentences, and them put them towards the end...and also remove the mention of 3rd world countries, it would more or less align with what you're saying. First 2 sentences had no mentions of these people nor did you make a case for those with no access.(Idiots who refuse to shower aren't doing any good but nor are they obligated to shower, then again, I did said they were far removed from my points)
1
Drifter995
Neko//Night
cruz737 wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
My initial post was also a point saying that there is no point to refuse to bathe in privileged culture.
Which again is completely different from my first post.
Then again, the post you replied to was somebody refusing to shower/ bathe at all. And calling it no privilege
cruz737 wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
Either that or you have no case and are relying on those tactics to try and use morality to get some form of highground, by pretending I have no morals. Clever.Drifter995 wrote...
The first three groups bit was saying bathing is a thing meaning there is no excuse for not bathing in a first or second world country which you are clearly responding to
>Don't argue on what I say!
Well if you say so.
The best way I can see the post rationalized is if I completely ignore the first half of the post or the very least first 2 sentences, and them put them towards the end...and also remove the mention of 3rd world countries, it would more or less align with what you're saying. First 2 sentences had no mentions of these people nor did you make a case for those with no access.(Idiots who refuse to shower aren't doing any good but nor are they obligated to shower, then again, I did said they were far removed from my points)
Never said don't argue on what I say, I'm saying half of your points aren't even points.
And fair enough, ballsed up my point in that one sentence, unless you read it in context, in which is still makes sense/ applies. No excuse not to bathe in reference to refusing to bathe, makes sense. Context is a thing. Use it.
And no. It is fine the way it is. It really isn't that hard cruz.
The post you quoted was about refusing to bathe. You said some places don't get the privilege, which is true. But again, the tumblr snowflake didn't create it for that purpose, they created it because they refuse to shower.
3
Because feminism is all about refusing to take a bath. In order to get utopian equality, all must not bathe since our unprivelledged bretheren cannot bathe.
-1
cruz737 wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
My initial post was also a point saying that there is no point to refuse to bathe in privileged culture.
Which again is completely different from my first post.
Drifter995 wrote...
Either that or you have no case and are relying on those tactics to try and use morality to get some form of highground, by pretending I have no morals. Clever.Drifter995 wrote...
The first three groups bit was saying bathing is a thing meaning there is no excuse for not bathing in a first or second world country which you are clearly responding to
>Don't argue on what I say!
Well if you say so.
The best way I can see the post rationalized is if I completely ignore the first half of the post or the very least first 2 sentences, and them put them towards the end...and also remove the mention of 3rd world countries, it would more or less align with what you're saying. First 2 sentences had no mentions of these people nor did you make a case for those with no access.(Idiots who refuse to shower aren't doing any good but nor are they obligated to shower, then again, I did said they were far removed from my points)
Well, some femmenazis think not bathing and not using makuup-deodorant is a political statement in sticking it to the patriarchy, something which I consider stupid and gross
[size=10]This wall of next needs some colour :3[/h]
3
All womens clothing is the by product of patriarchy, there for women should walk naked all the time to be true feminist. I mean come ooon, men can walk shirtless, women should too, aaaaaand they should be allowed to walk pantless / skirtless too because patriarchy is too strong.
4
animefreak_usa
Child of Samael
J.u.n wrote...
Da fuck? Ten pages? Okay. Now, this is just whoring for attention
2
Chlor wrote...
Renovartio wrote...
I'm for equal rights. Not Feminazis' woman superiority.So you're a feminist. Good on you.
feminists + equal rights = good joke
Equalists is the term if you're about gender equality
Quote from Wikipedia 'Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending a state of equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women.'
2
Kona-chan wrote...
KageMinowara wrote...
Kona-chan wrote...
oh man, this thread...Spoiler:
:)
pls no
Sorry but its the truth.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/article19871248.ece
2
KageMinowara wrote...
Kona-chan wrote...
KageMinowara wrote...
Kona-chan wrote...
oh man, this thread...Spoiler:
:)
pls no
Sorry but its the truth.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/article19871248.ece
cruz737 wrote...
Well, some parts of the world don't get the "privilege" of being more hygienic. Which correlates to shittier overall health.
OT:
1
animefreak_usa
Child of Samael
Renovartio wrote...
Kona-chan wrote...
oh man, this thread...miss you faggog
My taco has no guacamole