Breathless wrote...
sweetguide wrote...
nintendo414 wrote...
Non-virgin/aggressive dominate is actually preferred in my book. Honestly why do I see so many posts freaking out about how many people a partner has slept with. It just doesn't make sense to me. I understand the whole std thing but I can give a woman a bit more credit than thinking "Oh, she has had sex before. She must of been having sex with disease ridden men while sharing needles." I just think we don't give enough credit to more sexually liberated people. Plus I tear up if I see someone else's blood and would feel horrible if I hurt her so yeah rather have someone with more experience
Thank you
I am a girl not a virgin that does not mean I have been with 100 guys
But anyway I was the first for a virgin male I was the aggressive one and he was very happy
I don't know about other people, but to me when a girl is a non-virgin the issue isn't really 'omg slut' or 'ew, you probably have the plague' but rather it's "What if I can't hold a candle to the other guy(s)?" Yeah, I know it's pathetic, but it's just one of the worries I have.
As for the original question, I'd much rather the girl be the aggressor. Rather than intimidating I'd find it a bit more reassuring.
I think our opinions are fairly similar. I definitely don't consider non-virgin girls to be sluts, and an aggressive girl is really, really hot.
I think the reason I might prefer a virgin, at least for my first time, is that we'll both kinda suck at it right off the bat. Over time, we'll get better at it together, and that's somewhat comforting to me.
Still, I'd imagine a non-virgin girl would be much less afraid of sex, willing to initiate, and able to do some pretty amazing things. It's just that, like others, I doubt I could live up to her standards.