Getting arrested because of hentai

Pages Prev12345Next
0
Really? Customs now can look into your personal books? :/ This situation seems incredulous. Perhaps he was moving the manga for commercial purposes that they HAD to be checked. If that's the law in Canada then he should have been aware before bringing all that into the country. Dura lex sed lex.
0
Sgt.broski Where's the futa Jacob
[quote="animefreak_usa"]Loli is cp under certain contents and countries. Virtual child porn( which loli manga and hentai is) was illegal in the us from 98-02. That law was oveturn on a first amendment violation and replace with a law that still list loli has illegal under miller vs california.. if it passes the miller test then it not legal nor illegal to have or trade, but sell in a open market is still debatable. Pretty much if it non realistic then it in that gray area with extreme bondage and peudo snuff.

This is just my states law.. you have to see what your area does.

Shes right! according to the law you cannot obtain any child pornography and get caught with it even if its loli. Kinda strange that they could tell whither or not it was loli pornography.
0
Understand that child porn no matter what format is still child porn, the government and people will not care if its manga, loli, or whatever you want to call it. people dont care, if it has a kid having sex or someone that looks like a kid going through customs with that will land you in jail. period. but to be arrested for regular manga or doujinshi is absolutely absurd. but child porn is not.
0
I can understand if it is loli as it is the depiction of underage girls
-1
It still shows an unfortunate interest in children sexually. For a while I felt myself drifting into pedophilia, but a quick boycott of loli sent me back to normal. Slippery slopes, man.
1
The justification for banning loli I was given is that it "prevents actual abuse or the legitimization thereof". Putting aside the question of whether criminal statistics bear this out (they don't, not especially), I want to consider the implications of this from a philosophical standpoint.

Accepting this justification means that you accept two things: first, that the role of the law and the police are not redress for crimes that have happened, but prevention of crimes that may happen- and this, by necessity, gives them the ability to act against people who have not yet done any real harm to actual persons. The second is that you have charged it with the capacity of guiding culture itself such that it defends that culture from outside propaganda. The overall philosophical shift is one of the law from protector of the citizenry to top-down enforcement arm of the culture-as-determined-by-the-lawmakers. It's no coincidence that Bush and Harper are in such close proximity to assaults on these things.

Arresting people for things that haven't happened is bad for you, and before you give me that hypothetical you think you originated about the terrorist with the detailed plans of Soldier Field, consider that you are doing this in an era where America's FBI can put together a plot, conscript some OWS kids, and essentially punch-and-judy up free money.
0
i cant deny that loli=underaged anime girl, meaning loli hentai=CP. i have my opinion, but ill look for more info
0
Misaki_Chi Fakku Nurse
I enjoy manga and hentai, but the law is the law. I recently made a post to say that even if you look and read lolicon (I use the term reading loosely since there is a distinction between curiosity and obsession), that doesn't classify you as a pedophile, but the truth of the matter is that there are those who are and do.

I can understand why hentai gets a bad rep. Horny people come to a site to jerk off and like to fantasize about some of the things they read. I was lonely, I was horny, and this was one of the first sites I came to and found this sort of material. I decided to join the forums because I enjoyed some of the quirky people's posts and found that I wasn't alone in being an otaku videogaming pervert of a girl. I came to realize that I am not so different from others and came to accept the things I questioned and was afraid of within myself.

If they end up making hentai illegal, there is not much to be done about this since the law is the law. The truth of the matter is, porn is a part of society. Erotic fiction has been around for as long as humans have been on this earth and will continue to be around till the day we die. Age is always a big issue however, to which hentai and manga has been an issue in various states for some time now over this. I think people will just have to wait-and-see and abide by the law if such things happen.
0
ARCD wrote...
i cant deny that loli=underaged anime girl, meaning loli hentai=CP. i have my opinion, but ill look for more info


I can. Drawings are not children. There is no "C" for the "CP". The law can say otherwise, but the law says a lot of stuff, and when you're talking about law enforcement and ways of conceptualizing the world that a lot of people stand to profit from, well.

Who benefits from laws that treat fictions as real things with rights? Eliding the boundary between fact and fiction? Giving your three-letter agency of choice a new reason to police the internet? Cops who want more work, businesses that want to sell the cops Agile Internet Solutions, large media companies who want more laws backing them when they go after people who draw #34 of their characters? Who else might benefit from fictional things being granted personhood, you know, in a larger sense?

There is a reason that these kinds of laws come from the people they come from, at the times they do, and it ain't no "concern for the youth".
0
Grumbello wrote...
ARCD wrote...
i cant deny that loli=underaged anime girl, meaning loli hentai=CP. i have my opinion, but ill look for more info


I can. Drawings are not children. There is no "C" for the "CP". The law can say otherwise, but the law says a lot of stuff, and when you're talking about law enforcement and ways of conceptualizing the world that a lot of people stand to profit from, well.

Who benefits from laws that treat fictions as real things with rights? Eliding the boundary between fact and fiction? Giving your three-letter agency of choice a new reason to police the internet? Cops who want more work, businesses that want to sell the cops Agile Internet Solutions, large media companies who want more laws backing them when they go after people who draw #34 of their characters? Who else might benefit from fictional things being granted personhood, you know, in a larger sense?

There is a reason that these kinds of laws come from the people they come from, at the times they do, and it ain't no "concern for the youth".


where i live theres a saying "quien hizo la ley hizo la trampa" (who made the law, also made a way to evade it) that whould be the rough translation
1
Grumbello wrote...
Accepting this justification means that you accept two things: first, that the role of the law and the police are not redress for crimes that have happened, but prevention of crimes that may happen- and this, by necessity, gives them the ability to act against people who have not yet done any real harm to actual persons.


What rock you been hiding under? Governments around the world have been doing such things for a long time now. Including here in the states.
0
Solution? Hide your loli manga in hardcore old man porn.


But back to being serious, yes him getting arrested is shitty. And to top it off, he could have just put the manga on his phone or ipod or something to read from on the plane without getting ass-mangled by customs.
0
Holoofyoistu The Messenger
Not saying im into lolicon, cause im not, but if someone is sexually atracted t ochildren, and they get hentai to avoid cp and being a pedo, i think that is fine. I think that they are aknoledge tahgt they have a weired sexual complex and are dealing with it.

Also, customs is super uptight becasue if something gets through, its on them and they can lose their jobs.
0
Flaser OCD Hentai Collector
Grumbello wrote...
Spoiler:
The justification for banning loli I was given is that it "prevents actual abuse or the legitimization thereof". Putting aside the question of whether criminal statistics bear this out (they don't, not especially), I want to consider the implications of this from a philosophical standpoint.

Accepting this justification means that you accept two things: first, that the role of the law and the police are not redress for crimes that have happened, but prevention of crimes that may happen- and this, by necessity, gives them the ability to act against people who have not yet done any real harm to actual persons. The second is that you have charged it with the capacity of guiding culture itself such that it defends that culture from outside propaganda. The overall philosophical shift is one of the law from protector of the citizenry to top-down enforcement arm of the culture-as-determined-by-the-lawmakers. It's no coincidence that Bush and Harper are in such close proximity to assaults on these things.

Arresting people for things that haven't happened is bad for you, and before you give me that hypothetical you think you originated about the terrorist with the detailed plans of Soldier Field, consider that you are doing this in an era where America's FBI can put together a plot, conscript some OWS kids, and essentially punch-and-judy up free money.


Excellent post, from the newcomer!
Indeed, the problem with all slippery slope and 'bad thoughts lead to bad things' argument is that it turns the cops into a thought police.

I suggest reading up on the concept of negative liberty as invented by Isaiah Berlin if you can't grasp how fundamentally different that is from what intended job of law enforcement should be in a democratic society.

(Also, further details on the whole loli debacle can be found in my signature).
0
To me, saying reading loli hentai creates child molesters is like saying playing violent video games creates killers. I haven't seen any scientific studies that prove either of those. Though that being said, I refuse to download any loli hentai for my fear of the FBI knocking down my door at the same moment.
0
Flightkeeperrin2.0 wrote...
Personal... [color=red]CP is utter [CENSORED][/color]. Do to the "Sexualization of Modern Times", childern under the ages of 10 know what porn is, yet they cant do anything about until they get into highschool or college. But because PARENTS who thing childern should be sheilded from this stuff (though if they do that this site may loss the next genertaion of hentai lovers) never actually do ANYTHING to go through this, CP may stay a rolling topic. As for customs is concern... [CENSORED] CUSTOMS, I AM TAKING A PLANE AND A COVERING MY BOOKS IN BOOK COVERS (black/green double layers for extra safety).


Forum Image: https://i.imgur.com/LwwbM1u.png
0
Carnes344 wrote...
To me, saying reading loli hentai creates child molesters is like saying playing violent video games creates killers. I haven't seen any scientific studies that prove either of those. Though that being said, I refuse to download any loli hentai for my fear of the FBI knocking down my door at the same moment.


I wouldn't agree that (the idea that games/loli make killers/molesters) but I don't think the Loli issue ends here. I'm not going to argue the perfection of the legal system either. But there is a slight edge here which is the following:

It can be that people just like Loli drawings or it can be that they like the real stuff and they use Loli as an alternative. If we face the first one, the only discussion would be whether it is moral to create underage characters in sexual scenarios. The strong counter-argument being «They are drawings, not real people». Personally, as risking a brave and courageous negative vote, I think it is a bit odd that you specifically like Hentai characters that are made specefically to look young but whatever, I won't lose sleep over it. In that case, to each their own, we might as well move on. However, in the second scenario, Loli does not make child molesters but child molesters find Loli. In that case, the law makers have a point.

Naturally, I'm not saying all Loli people are child molesters but it seems quite dumb to say there aren't any. In all likelihood, there are. The perhaps positive side to this would be that Loli can be a replacement to supress the urge to criminal action. Either way, I think the debate is open to both ways. Neither side can end it with a few sentences.
0
justdroppinby wrote...
Really? Customs now can look into your personal books? :/ This situation seems incredulous.


Customs has always had the power to look into anything you bring over the border. They do it with people coming over the border, they do it with people coming in on planes, they do it with stuff you order from overseas. You could cover all your loli hentai with regular magazine covers, and while it would LESSEN the chance they'd look at them, it would not stop it from potentially happening, and the charges etc that you would face.

If you come in by car, Customs has the right, if they suspect something, to take your car apart and leave the pieces and tools for you to put it back together again. How them looking through your suitcase is anything big compared to that is beyond me.
0
Their intentions are not bad... Its called prevention, but sometimes the laws aren't well interpreted. This man got very unlucky, but as Canada is a very comprehensive place, in the end probably he is fine... Or I hope so.
0
I personally think that Loli hentai is the best option for people who are into cp, I myself am not into it. But when there is Loli hentai, no children are harmed, there is material for pedophiles to jack off to, nobody is hurt, its like win win for everybody!
Pages Prev12345Next