|
|
|
| Quadratic wrote... | | Well, there are more than 2 pages of topics that were replied in while I'm gone (usually 4-8 hours). I think we need a bit more room. Maybe 3-4 pages. |
I agree with this. We need enough space to contain all the topics that changed in at least 24 hours. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Ramsus wrote... | | How does it not limit communication? It's like having 5 people talking to me in one hour but somehow only having the ability to notice 2 of them. (This is not really the best analogy but whatever.) |
It more like 5 people having conversations with other people and the conversation ends before you arrive. But even that's not a good analogy. You can still access the threads. If one doesn't want to put in that very minute amount of effort to see them, then apparently there wasn't much interest to begin with.
| Ramsus wrote... | | I'm 90% certain that there have been entire threads in the last few days that I haven't even noticed, possibly ones I might have been interested in more than "You lose game", "Why yous all pedos?", or "this response to thing" threads. |
Join the club. I wonder how many threads I might be interested in that I have completely ignored. |
|
|
|
|
| |
Feon
FAKKU Elder
Posts: 1,269
|
|
|
damn now i have to recreate haruhism oh well it cant be helped |
|
|
|
|
| |
Gambler
FAKKU Global Moderator
Posts: 1,884
|
|
Once again, I am late to the party, but what I am concerned about is whether the limit on the pages in "incoherent babblings" will affect the number of threads started in "random".
Perhaps I am being overly worried, but if some members think that their thread will be bumped off easily under "incoherent babblings", then they may choose to start one in "random", lowering the quality of discussion in the latter section.
I will try and observe the situation in random... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
IB sucks with only 2 pages imo, you should of made it like 10 or something since now all the damn threads I missed while I was gone I'll never get to see. =/ |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
I don't even understand why people bother wasting their time in IB. Nothing of real discussion happens there in the first place. And all I see are the same garbage, time-sink threads that people incessantly bring up to the top that has anything but intelligent posts. |
|
|
|
|
| |
Kaimax
VN and Eroge Discussion Moderator
Posts: 6,473
|
|
| g-money wrote... | | I don't even understand why people bother wasting their time in IB. Nothing of real discussion happens there in the first place. And all I see are the same garbage, time-sink threads that people incessantly bring up to the top that has anything but intelligent posts. |
QFT.
People should really lower down the activity in IB, other threads in the special interest and hobbies needs more attention. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| g-money wrote... | | I don't even understand why people bother wasting their time in IB. Nothing of real discussion happens there in the first place. And all I see are the same garbage, time-sink threads that people incessantly bring up to the top that has anything but intelligent posts. |
While I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment, I also find gambler's concerns about it seeping into other parts of the board quite thought-provoking and not too far-fetched. Although rigorous moderation might take care of that.
| Kaimax wrote... | | People should really lower down the activity in IB, other threads in the special interest and hobbies needs more attention. |
Careful what you wish for, Kaimax, lest your wishes come true ;p. As exemplified by what happened to, say, "Love, Romance & Relationships". |
|
|
|
|
| |
KLoWn
Game Uploads Moderator
Posts: 5,521
|
|
| g-money wrote... | | I don't even understand why people bother wasting their time in IB. Nothing of real discussion happens there in the first place. And all I see are the same garbage, time-sink threads that people incessantly bring up to the top that has anything but intelligent posts. |
Better to have all the crap in one place instead of all over the forum  |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
That's why IB is still there (I'm not proposing to get rid of it), for the crap and the lulz. The main part of the forum is still there, and hopefully instead of searching through pages of threads through a trial and error basis, people will give up and post decently in real threads in real sections.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the two IB page rule is an awesome idea. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The pages has come back~!
yay! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Should've been /b/ rules.
10 pages, anything bumped off is deleted permanently. Oh well. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| TehMikuruSlave wrote... | Should've been /b/ rules.
10 pages, anything bumped off is deleted permanently. Oh well. |
While I hate any mention of 4chan within the vicinity of this site, I'd have to agree that something like that would be an interesting way of handling IB. |
|
|
|
|
| |
Xil
FAKKU Elite
Posts: 603
|
|
Agreed with the above. How many people honestly go further back than 10 pages, if that?
And for those who do, how many will really care for longer than the moment they notice they no longer can? |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| TehMikuruSlave wrote... | Should've been /b/ rules.
10 pages, anything bumped off is deleted permanently. Oh well. |
This sounds like a great idea. I'd be totally for it.
@Xil: you're totally right. I don't bother going back more than 3-5 pages, if then that. |
|
|
|
|
| |
