Did you like Assassins Creed 3?
0
I enjoyed it, I actually like Connor more than I liked Ezio when he was first introduced, he has a certain charm about him. Altair is still the best though.
0
AssertiveTinCan wrote...
Street Saint wrote...
AssertiveTinCan wrote...
[size=12][/h]I recently played Assassins Creed 3 (LATE!) and I thought it was horrible! The story wasn't compelling and there were all kinds of graphical flaws. And I just wanted to know if I was the only one to think this was the worst of the series? You think this is the worst one? Did you play revelations?
I liked the story of III, well, Conners story. Plot twists, character development, betrayal. Fair enough, Conner's character as an adult was... Shit most of the time. Sea battles were a good addition. End boss was a joke.
Desmond's story was fine till the end. The end was a joke filled with holes. Apart from Desmonds face, the graphics were fine to me.
Altiar - Angry because of his failure. Ezio - Angry bcause of his family's death. Conner - Angry because of his mothers death and his land being taken. Desmond - Angry because he was born into the brotherhood. Assassins are a very angry people.
in the others before AC3 there was stuff to do, like find the secret armor and side missions to liberate areas. And yeah you can do that in AC3 but it wasn't as rewarding as the others.
That's probably because they put more effort in to the homestead and privateer missions. Yes, it felt better to wear Altair's armor than... Conner's mentor's (name?) And I did liberate, it kept glitching, though. But I think it's better like that. Not the glitches, the side missions are more story driven. You're even hunting for someone during the Aquilla (ships name, right?) missions. Felt more rewarding to me.
0
Gotta play the homestead missions and what not to get the most out the game
But I found the game intriguing across the 40 hours I spent on it
But I found the game intriguing across the 40 hours I spent on it
0
Street Saint wrote...
AssertiveTinCan wrote...
Street Saint wrote...
AssertiveTinCan wrote...
[size=12][/h]I recently played Assassins Creed 3 (LATE!) and I thought it was horrible! The story wasn't compelling and there were all kinds of graphical flaws. And I just wanted to know if I was the only one to think this was the worst of the series? You think this is the worst one? Did you play revelations?
I liked the story of III, well, Conners story. Plot twists, character development, betrayal. Fair enough, Conner's character as an adult was... Shit most of the time. Sea battles were a good addition. End boss was a joke.
Desmond's story was fine till the end. The end was a joke filled with holes. Apart from Desmonds face, the graphics were fine to me.
Altiar - Angry because of his failure. Ezio - Angry bcause of his family's death. Conner - Angry because of his mothers death and his land being taken. Desmond - Angry because he was born into the brotherhood. Assassins are a very angry people.
in the others before AC3 there was stuff to do, like find the secret armor and side missions to liberate areas. And yeah you can do that in AC3 but it wasn't as rewarding as the others.
That's probably because they put more effort in to the homestead and privateer missions. Yes, it felt better to wear Altair's armor than... Conner's mentor's (name?) And I did liberate, it kept glitching, though. But I think it's better like that. Not the glitches, the side missions are more story driven. You're even hunting for someone during the Aquilla (ships name, right?) missions. Felt more rewarding to me.
well I've been completing side quests and I still feel robbed, Maybe its just me.
