I'm ϟƘƦƖןןΣ✘ and I Drop the Bass
0
artcellrox wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
In my opinion, you're just one of those guys that think that music is all about guitar, drum, bass and vocal, and also dubstep is all about pressing the button PLAY. Hence, you calling dubstep shit.I personally think no matter what kind of music there is, it should be appreciated. I try not to take this personally since I like dubstep, but I've seen a dubstep music in the making once (my friend is a dubstep artist back in Indonesia), and it's not just pressing the button PLAY.
I know you may or may not meant it literally, but the thought itself is irritating enough.
My point is, why not just appreciate its existence? They do put some effort too on making dubstep musics, even though their fanbase isn't really the best there is, my point is, appreciate the effort of bringing entertainment.
[EDIT]: Let's see here, after reading the 1950 or something part of your post, something came up on my mind. What makes you think that if this music was considered good, it automatically makes music that was made before the 50s was bad? It's just an advancement in technology, nobody has said that music before this era was shit.
mu·sic
/ˈmyo͞ozik/
Noun
The art or science of combining vocal or instrumental sounds (or both) to produce beauty of form, harmony, and expression of emotion.
If you ask me, I don't hear anything instrumental, beautiful, harmonious or emotional about dubstep. Nothing about that definition says it has to be appreciated by anyone either, so it's probably why I just consider most dubstep to be plain noise. Anyone making a profit out of entertaining through that: good for them. But I just don't believe calling them "musicians" is right. It sits off with me, considering all the hard work my band and I had to go through, just to get two measly songs on the radio back home.
Welcome to the digital age, now deal with it.
Also, according to Wikipedia:
Music is an art form whose medium is sound and silence.
Also, the other Google definition:
The vocal or instrumental sound produced in this way.
0
Skrillex should drop the bass and never pick it up again.
Its terrible when today's "music" consists of a noise akin to robots boning each other.
Its terrible when today's "music" consists of a noise akin to robots boning each other.
0
devsonfire wrote...
1. It's the instrument, of course it wouldn't exist without computers. Same with other type of instruments needed to play other genres of music.
2.No, what makes you believe it's like that? I don't think it's like that. Just like other musics, repetitive beats or melody will get you nowhere.
1. It's the nature of the instrument. Since it's the computer, everything you do is automatically recorded.
2. Phrasing. I mean that you only need to do the song once. Because then it's recorded and can be played at the push of a button. Your work is done.
devsonfire wrote...
Then what's the point of a concert? Again, it's applicable to other genres of musics as well. It's the live shows of the person playing the music is what the audience is watching.
With traditional instruments, the people are actually watching them play. They're performing.
You can't perform live with that genre. None of the more complex songs, anyways- because a guy's only got two hands. So two keyboards... about 5 tracks maximum- including one stock track playing independently. Even less live performance and more stock tracks if he's performing with a turntable.
It's less real- if you get what I mean.
devsonfire wrote...
Again, what makes you say that? Do I have to repeat what I said?
The song is made. By nature of the instrument- any song they make exists digitally. And can only ever exist in that medium.
As such, anyone with a copy of that song can play it and pass it off as their own. Because the actual "performance" is the hours spent composing and mixing it at home in their studio.
If your song ever plays on the radio, you can't ever prove that it's you. Can't take your instrument and start playing. Can't take the instrument around and just jam on the street.
cruz737 wrote...
Without other genres to be based off, it wouldn't exist either, but that's irrelevant to the actual "quality" of the music.
I guess you're arguing something different, although you're arguing because of that difference, it's magically superior.
My argument is that it's better because there is a more human element to it, and that I prefer people to machines.
The only skill required for the techno stuff is a good ear.
A musician on a guitar or piano or drum needs a good ear, but also needs the skill to play the instrument.
cruz737 wrote...
Also you're still kidding right?
Also there were traces of older civilization in Iran, the Mediterranean, and South America. But I guess you're sorta right when you say "recognized"
When I studied ancient history back in college, it was the oldest one known. My knowledge in the area is circa 2006.
Grenouille88 wrote...
What's even being talked about? Too lazy to read.
I'm arguing that music without computers is better than music with. Feel free to join in.
0
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
artcellrox wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
In my opinion, you're just one of those guys that think that music is all about guitar, drum, bass and vocal, and also dubstep is all about pressing the button PLAY. Hence, you calling dubstep shit.I personally think no matter what kind of music there is, it should be appreciated. I try not to take this personally since I like dubstep, but I've seen a dubstep music in the making once (my friend is a dubstep artist back in Indonesia), and it's not just pressing the button PLAY.
I know you may or may not meant it literally, but the thought itself is irritating enough.
My point is, why not just appreciate its existence? They do put some effort too on making dubstep musics, even though their fanbase isn't really the best there is, my point is, appreciate the effort of bringing entertainment.
[EDIT]: Let's see here, after reading the 1950 or something part of your post, something came up on my mind. What makes you think that if this music was considered good, it automatically makes music that was made before the 50s was bad? It's just an advancement in technology, nobody has said that music before this era was shit.
mu·sic
/ˈmyo͞ozik/
Noun
The art or science of combining vocal or instrumental sounds (or both) to produce beauty of form, harmony, and expression of emotion.
If you ask me, I don't hear anything instrumental, beautiful, harmonious or emotional about dubstep. Nothing about that definition says it has to be appreciated by anyone either, so it's probably why I just consider most dubstep to be plain noise. Anyone making a profit out of entertaining through that: good for them. But I just don't believe calling them "musicians" is right. It sits off with me, considering all the hard work my band and I had to go through, just to get two measly songs on the radio back home.
I'm not gonna talk about the un bolded part. I'm just gonna focus on the bolded part.
1. It's YOU who don't hear anything instrumental, beautiful, etc etc. Therefore, an opinion.
2. It does not have to be appreciated, but it's common sense.
Let me throw this back at you. You and your bands create music with all the hardwork, and no one appreciates it. How would you feel? Same goes at Skrillex, Knife Party, etc. Maybe, they just grew up not giving a single fuck, since they are already famous anyway.
And, don't even dare thinking that what they are doing is not hard. You and your band aren't the only ones who try hard, they do too.
0
Whups. Missed this.
As for themes and subjects- that is entirely independent of genre. Trends develop within genres- yes- but you're not locked into them.
A lot of musicians now rely on electronics not only for post-production and finalizing, like I assume you believe they do, but for replacing certain roles traditional people could have done but opted to replace them.
Fear Factory's The Industrialist was only Burton C. Bell and Dino Cazares, a singer and guitar player. They replaced the drummer with a drum machine during album production. Korn's Path to Totality also replaced the drummer with a drum machine. Those are the two I can think of at the top of my head.
As for themes and subjects, they are free to explore, but only a few band have the aptitude to actually do so. More often than not, artists restrict themselves based on profitability, culture, and the amount of time they have to make it. That happens with almost every single band/musician, if not all, out there.
Yes, but they wouldn't have needed drum machines had they drummers.
Also- as Devs and have I agreed on- you absolutely need a computer for this genre, because the computer is also the instrument.
So- the discussion is twofold:
The overt reliance on computers for this genre, and-
The value of the computer as an instrument- should we want to add that aspect to this debacle.
[EDIT]Waiting on someone to post so I can reply PumpJack's latest post. CBF editing my post
Exactly what I mean. Certain genres appeal to certain people; common sense. However, people lose that idea when arguing over music genres in general, so it turns into one huge shitfest.
This conversation has been fairly civil thus far.
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
PumpJack McGee wrote...
Computers may be used in post-production for mixing and finalising yes, I'll grant you that- but they don't need it to play.As for themes and subjects- that is entirely independent of genre. Trends develop within genres- yes- but you're not locked into them.
A lot of musicians now rely on electronics not only for post-production and finalizing, like I assume you believe they do, but for replacing certain roles traditional people could have done but opted to replace them.
Fear Factory's The Industrialist was only Burton C. Bell and Dino Cazares, a singer and guitar player. They replaced the drummer with a drum machine during album production. Korn's Path to Totality also replaced the drummer with a drum machine. Those are the two I can think of at the top of my head.
As for themes and subjects, they are free to explore, but only a few band have the aptitude to actually do so. More often than not, artists restrict themselves based on profitability, culture, and the amount of time they have to make it. That happens with almost every single band/musician, if not all, out there.
Yes, but they wouldn't have needed drum machines had they drummers.
Also- as Devs and have I agreed on- you absolutely need a computer for this genre, because the computer is also the instrument.
So- the discussion is twofold:
The overt reliance on computers for this genre, and-
The value of the computer as an instrument- should we want to add that aspect to this debacle.
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
I gotta agree with you there, that is precisely why I mentioned that dubstep may not have the best fanbase there is. And yes, those people who thinks that Dubstep is just about pressing the play button irritates the hell out of me. Even typing on computers and chatting like this do need some skill you know.[EDIT]Waiting on someone to post so I can reply PumpJack's latest post. CBF editing my post
Exactly what I mean. Certain genres appeal to certain people; common sense. However, people lose that idea when arguing over music genres in general, so it turns into one huge shitfest.
This conversation has been fairly civil thus far.
0
Spoiler:
I wasn't referring to this one. It has been really civil compared to others on this site as well as others. I just mean generally on sites like 4Chan, Reddit and YouTube. You get people insulting each other and shit and it all goes downhill.
0
artcellrox
The Grey Knight :y
devsonfire wrote...
artcellrox wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
In my opinion, you're just one of those guys that think that music is all about guitar, drum, bass and vocal, and also dubstep is all about pressing the button PLAY. Hence, you calling dubstep shit.I personally think no matter what kind of music there is, it should be appreciated. I try not to take this personally since I like dubstep, but I've seen a dubstep music in the making once (my friend is a dubstep artist back in Indonesia), and it's not just pressing the button PLAY.
I know you may or may not meant it literally, but the thought itself is irritating enough.
My point is, why not just appreciate its existence? They do put some effort too on making dubstep musics, even though their fanbase isn't really the best there is, my point is, appreciate the effort of bringing entertainment.
[EDIT]: Let's see here, after reading the 1950 or something part of your post, something came up on my mind. What makes you think that if this music was considered good, it automatically makes music that was made before the 50s was bad? It's just an advancement in technology, nobody has said that music before this era was shit.
mu·sic
/ˈmyo͞ozik/
Noun
The art or science of combining vocal or instrumental sounds (or both) to produce beauty of form, harmony, and expression of emotion.
If you ask me, I don't hear anything instrumental, beautiful, harmonious or emotional about dubstep. Nothing about that definition says it has to be appreciated by anyone either, so it's probably why I just consider most dubstep to be plain noise. Anyone making a profit out of entertaining through that: good for them. But I just don't believe calling them "musicians" is right. It sits off with me, considering all the hard work my band and I had to go through, just to get two measly songs on the radio back home.
I'm not gonna talk about the un bolded part. I'm just gonna focus on the bolded part.
1. It's YOU who don't hear anything instrumental, beautiful, etc etc. Therefore, an opinion.
2. It does not have to be appreciated, but it's common sense.
Let me throw this back at you. You and your bands create music with all the hardwork, and no one appreciates it. How would you feel? Same goes at Skrillex, Knife Party, etc. Maybe, they just grew up not giving a single fuck, since they are already famous anyway.
And, don't even dare thinking that what they are doing is not hard. You and your band aren't the only ones who try hard, they do too.
Actually, we wouldn't care all that much if we didn't. I wouldn;t at least. I create music to express myself; what I feel and what I want to say when I can't find the words to say. If no one hears it, no problem for me. Yeah, I'm weird like that.
And quite frankly, yes, I do think we have to work harder, at least to get even half the recognition he gets. Put it simply, Skrillex has himself to compose the music, some meme to sample from, his agents to book shows, his record company deals with finances. You know how most bands in Bangladesh have to do all those? By themselves. All the time. We have to find our own shows; we have to pay to get practice times, we have to take time off our normally busy lives just to do what we love most. Yeah, I'm sure they try hard, but it's still relative in my opinion.
0
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Spoiler:
You have got most of the points right, I agree with you, but yet, from what I concluded, we both missed on my points here. Indeed, relatively, music without computers is better, but that does not give any rights to those that believe so to look down on music with computers.
If I am not mistaken, you're here just showing your dislike towards dubstep without really trying to look down as if the the worst thing there is in the world. Bearded did a bit of trolling on his side though, but his points do makes sense a lot.
It's been a pleasure discussing things with you. While I agree with you on this regard, I still assume dubstep still deserve credit for entertaining people on its own way and their effort.
@ART: Put it simply, since we're talking about Skrillex here, he has done his bit in getting himself recognized in music industries thanks to From First To Last. That played a role in getting Skrillex famous as it is now. If we're talking about luck, then I personally think he has a bigger luck than you do, and that isn't really anything much you or I can do to improve luck.
But, it's not my point. Again, my point is, give the credit he deserves when it's due.
0
devsonfire wrote...
Spoiler:
You have got most of the points right, I agree with you, but yet, from what I concluded, we both missed on my points here. Indeed, relatively, music without computers is better, but that does not give any rights to those that believe so to look down on music with computers.
If I am not mistaken, you're here just showing your dislike towards dubstep without really trying to look down as if the the worst thing there is in the world. Bearded did a bit of trolling on his side though, but his points do makes sense a lot.
It's been a pleasure discussing things with you. While I agree with you on this regard, I still assume dubstep still deserve credit for entertaining people on its own way and their effort.
Heh. Never said it didn't.
All forms of music have their worth and merit, I just personally believe that other forms of music are a little higher up on the scale.
Or perhaps just different in essence.
Rock, Jazz, etc. = Good musicians.
Dubstep, Techno. = Good mixers.
And with that, now I lay me down to sleep- because I am full of rum and am getting rather drowsy.
'Night.
0
PumpJack McGee wrote...
Yes, but they wouldn't have needed drum machines had they drummers.It's not they didn't have drummers; they got rid of them in favor of drum machines.
0
Zaff wrote...
I'm a metalhead, and i like dubstep. Heres a song.From what I understand, and this kind of makes sense, brostep (Skrillex, Excision, others like these bands) is more aggressive than other forms of EDM and has more appeal to metalheads.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubstep#Brostep_and_American_developments
0
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
Zaff wrote...
I'm a metalhead, and i like dubstep. Heres a song.From what I understand, and this kind of makes sense, brostep (Skrillex, Excision, others like these bands) is more aggressive than other forms of EDM and has more appeal to metalheads.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubstep#Brostep_and_American_developments
It's not just dubstep, i like a bunch of different types of EDM. House, Trance, DnB, etc. Though i must admit, the heaviness is part of what i enjoy about dubstep.
0
Zaff wrote...
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
Zaff wrote...
I'm a metalhead, and i like dubstep. Heres a song.From what I understand, and this kind of makes sense, brostep (Skrillex, Excision, others like these bands) is more aggressive than other forms of EDM and has more appeal to metalheads.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubstep#Brostep_and_American_developments
It's not just dubstep, i like a bunch of different types of EDM. House, Trance, DnB, etc. Though i must admit, the heaviness is part of what i enjoy about dubstep.
I'm the same way; just pointing something out about metalheads and dubstep (brostep).