So...yeah.
0
Waar wrote...
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
Waar wrote...
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
It still equals animals being killed.Wasn't referring to the act but the person committing the act. Some animals need to be killed.
And I agree. I was just referring to the act itself, not whoever is behind it.
Why are you explaining it to me, I made the original statement which you misunderstood... You have some weird communication issues.
You do, my good sir. You tell not to quote when I don't want a discussion, and you turn around and do the same thing.
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
Waar wrote...
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
Waar wrote...
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
It still equals animals being killed.Wasn't referring to the act but the person committing the act. Some animals need to be killed.
And I agree. I was just referring to the act itself, not whoever is behind it.
Why are you explaining it to me, I made the original statement which you misunderstood... You have some weird communication issues.
You do, my good sir. You tell not to quote when I don't want a discussion, and you turn around and do the same thing.
I will break it down for you:
First comment about SPCA putting animals down
My reply saying SPCA and PETA were entirely different
Your reply saying regardless it's still killing(unrelated to my comment)
My reply clears up that I wasn't referring to the act(trying to help you understand)
Your reply saying you were referring to the act alone(unnecessary)
See my point now is that I understand you're talking about the act but that has nothing to do with what I mentioned, at all. So I don't need you to clear up your comment because it's unrelated. I made the original statement(which you misunderstood), and thus you have no reason to explain yourself. Why would I need your misunderstanding explained to me? (I said the same thing about 3 different ways here)
Long story short your communication style is clumsy and unorthodox, you tend to run off on tangents that are beside the point. It makes these conversations short and easy for me to dissect.
0
Waar wrote...
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
Waar wrote...
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
Waar wrote...
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
It still equals animals being killed.Wasn't referring to the act but the person committing the act. Some animals need to be killed.
And I agree. I was just referring to the act itself, not whoever is behind it.
Why are you explaining it to me, I made the original statement which you misunderstood... You have some weird communication issues.
You do, my good sir. You tell not to quote when I don't want a discussion, and you turn around and do the same thing.
I will break it down for you:
First comment about SPCA putting animals down
My reply saying SPCA and PETA were entirely different
Your reply saying regardless it's still killing(unrelated to my comment)
My reply clears up that I wasn't referring to the act(trying to help you understand)
Your reply saying you were referring to the act alone(unnecessary)
See my point now is that I understand you're talking about the act but that has nothing to do with what I mentioned, at all. So I don't need you to clear up your comment because it's unrelated. I made the original statement(which you misunderstood), and thus you have no reason to explain yourself. Why would I need your misunderstanding explained to me? (I said the same thing about 3 different ways here)
Long story short your communication style is clumsy and unorthodox, you tend to run off on tangents that are beside the point. It makes these conversations short and easy for me to dissect.
I'm bored pissin' you off. Go home.
0
Waar wrote...
You forget yourself sir. Anger has no place in my heart.My bad, Waar. You teach amazing things.
1
I always thought PETA stood for People Eating Tasty Animals
Also, I wonder what their thoughts are on Pokemon Conquest, where you use them as soldiers for war?
Even if not all of PETA is bad, it's reputation for being the most ridiculous when it comes to animal rights stuff has surpassed it's actual accomplishments. I would be embarrassed to be a member of PETA.
Also, I wonder what their thoughts are on Pokemon Conquest, where you use them as soldiers for war?
Even if not all of PETA is bad, it's reputation for being the most ridiculous when it comes to animal rights stuff has surpassed it's actual accomplishments. I would be embarrassed to be a member of PETA.
0
Harune wrote...
The annoying thing is people that actually support this fuckeryPeople can be really dumb sometimes.
There was a film about stupid people who didn't even know where the meat came from they were eating. They were taken to animal farms to see how those animals lived, and then to the butchery to see how they were slain.
All of them threw up. Man, I know that in english, the animal and the meat that is made of it has different names, but how stupid can someone be ?

yummines wrote...
I always thought PETA stood for People Eating Tasty Animals
Take my +rep !
0
I tend to forget how much people can be dumb, this kind of thing reminds me of that...
It does...
Kind of an opposed organization
yummines wrote...
I always thought PETA stood for People Eating Tasty AnimalsIt does...
Kind of an opposed organization
0
Waar wrote...
To be fair your source is not one most would consider reliable.I recognize that, but PETA did release their statistics regarding euthanasia and there is a document regarding PETA, but I don't trust the source( the link below) http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
GiantBeardedFace wrote...
It still equals animals being killed.Yes, but it depends on the reason such as a tumor or anything that is seriously harming the animal.
I work with a small animal organization and we had to put down one of the dogs because he had aggressive Fibrosarcoma.
0
say what! wrote...
Yes, but it depends on reason such as a tumor or anything that is seriously harming the animal.I work with a small animal organization and we had to put down one of the dogs because he had aggressive Fibrosarcoma.
I agree some animals are better off being put down because it would be more humane, especially if they have a life-threatening injury they can't recover from or a disease that's hurting/weakening them while being virtually impossible to rid them of. Fibrosarcoma, poor dog.
0
Harontiar wrote...
Spoiler:
What the hell is that supposed to be?
He's getting a blowjob from a pokemon? That's the pinnacle of Poke-Master relations!
0
I_love_flat_chests wrote...
Harontiar wrote...
Spoiler:
What the hell is that supposed to be?
He's getting a blowjob from a pokemon? That's the pinnacle of Poke-Master relations!
No, that's Luka from Monster Girl Quest beating a slime girl away from his dick.
0
Tyranosaurus_Secks wrote...
I_love_flat_chests wrote...
Harontiar wrote...
Spoiler:
What the hell is that supposed to be?
He's getting a blowjob from a pokemon? That's the pinnacle of Poke-Master relations!
No, that's Luka from Monster Girl Quest beating a slime girl away from his dick.
Ah I see. Played that game, but haven't completed it yet. I spent more time trying to lose and get all the moves of the monsters to complete the bestiary. Personally I like the little loli vampire girl (if I recall correctly) the most.
0
PETA is still gay as ever with its members sodomizing each other.
If their faggotry gets even worse, someone/somebody will take them head on.
Bad reputation? Have any proof of that statement? As far as I know they are a very respected organization. Even though I don't agree with some of their policies I can't help but respect their ideals.
I guess I shouldn't expect our generation to be any more capable of interpreting actions beyond their surface level.
Your fucking blind/deaf
If their faggotry gets even worse, someone/somebody will take them head on.
lusobr wrote...
Tyranosaurus_Secks wrote...
All they're doing with this is making their reputation worse than it already is...and was pretty much in the shithole to begin with.Bad reputation? Have any proof of that statement? As far as I know they are a very respected organization. Even though I don't agree with some of their policies I can't help but respect their ideals.
I guess I shouldn't expect our generation to be any more capable of interpreting actions beyond their surface level.
Your fucking blind/deaf
