Battlefield 3 vs MW3

Call of Duty has basically become the casual FPS that every ten year old has, the community even on the PC version has gone to shit imo. Battlefield 3 is getting my money, especially cause of the epic things they are doing for the PC version. Call of Duty gameplay has gotten pretty old also, but then again I've been playing since day 1 of the first one.

Battlefield 3 hands down, has superior graphics, life like animations and has vehicles and aircraft you can operate and use. Not only that but i love the fact that you can chip-away at cover and structures soo much more satisfying. Plus its more a team/squad based game more so than the Modern Warfare series. Looking forward to its release and have pre-ordered it as such. Until then i will unfortunately satisfy my fps ware genre hunger onto the ever so slightly glitchy Modern Warfare 2.

Just the same run and shoot game so whats the point.

I am going to buy both games, but call of duty is starting to get boring.

Call of duty can suck a fat dick! That shit is so over rated now. Fuck you activision

well i agree with that statement but each of us has our own opinion..

For sure not getting MW3. Not sure on BF3 though, it looks promising so far.
I completely lost faith in Activision after MW2 and most likely won't purchase any of their games in the future.

I'm gonna get both but I'm a big Battlefield fan so that's my choice.

I wrote that statement to piss off the person who -rep'd me for my opinion. I really don't care for rep but according to that person "COD is deh best".

Battlefield of course. The graphics look better than MW3. The multiplayer is actually bjective and requires teamwork, unlike COD, where all you have to do is kill. And Battlefield has a better online community.

I wouldn't keep my hopes up for either of those games.

Waste of money, in my opinion.

o 3o a lot of people are saying Battlefield but are you sure you even have the patience for the dang game in the first place...=] I would love to get CoD but i'm scared they are going to just slap the same system on from Mw2/Blops so...I'm going with Battlefield but if people say Mw3 is any good then I will consider getting it =]

MW3, is ging to be liek the rest of the COD series, after World At War, Nothing new about it, no new graphics engine, maybe a few new guns and maybe a new perk, some gun balance, but thats it, it's more like a big update or even a expansion pack, and it's sticking with the crappy unreal engine,
i personally think BF3 will be better, the same people behind the Battlefield 2 (not Bad Company, the ORIGINAL BF2) will be working on it, and a new Graphics Engine, it know runs on the Frostbite 2 engine, and it looks... NERD-GASMIC

That MW3 trailer on page 2 looks nice, and damn, I saw a A10 Thunderbolt, so that's bonus points in there from me.

Very huge difference from COD game I played in walmart. The graphics and the whole exploding shit world going to shit with bombs dropping all over.

It did however make me curious if skyscrapers in Manhattan can actually take a missile hit and stay standing.

they are both the same genre of game, but I lean towards MW because I personally hate Dice and dont want my multiplayer experience to be vehicle oriented, albeit I do hate activision too, they have made some broken games. In the end im probably just getting it because its just the newest shooter thats out at the time.

crap seeing the gameplay made me want to buy mw3 maybe ill just buy both

I hate to compare the 2, because they are both played quite differently. Modern Warfare playing out to the gamers that like fast paced, noob toob multikills and quickscoping, Battlefield is for gamer who like a more, realistic feel and on full sized maps with more war type elements.
In my opinion though
BF>CoD always and forever

Activision pushes the developers to release the game even though they aren't 100% finished with them. If BF could draw in more players, than there's no doubt in my mind that BF would be the better game. But COD has a lot more players and sometimes the imbalance of things makes that game fun.
BF is definitely a lot more balanced and well made.

I agree with this^^^ CoD can be fun at times for it's fast paced imbalances, but it doesn't have the same quality gameplay as Battlefield and the frostbite engine

When i play CoD it's just same old stuff every match. On the other hand when i play BF, i seem to find new things to enjoy every now and then. Imo there is no need for a sniper weapon in CoD since the game is just not *true* sniper friendly, while in BF *yes i'm talking about BC2 since i played it the most of all* you know exactly when to Camp and when to Rush. Graphics are irrelevant to me. The main problem for me is in CoD you can easily destroy enemy support killstreaks, while in BF i suck hard at destroying enemy choppers which sometimes frustrates me a bit.

P.S. Even knifing feels more satisfying in BF.