Is there a such thing as "too young"in lolicon.

Babies. I don't even understand how that can turn somebody one. There's nothing there!

well...if it's toddler or elementary it's a red zone

Fine if its just in Primary or Junior high zone (Kodomo no Jikan is a prime example although not H but E).

the youngest H I ever collect is Mom's Vitamin by Minako Nami for Shota-cest
and Planetarium translated by Anon of Spain for loli-prost

The more realistic it is the more realistic I like the ages to be... though over ~15 would be too old.

If it gets too realistic or too young for the particular level of realism then I cannot look at it though.

Like others have said, it depends on the artist. If the artist can do a good job (like Inuboshi), I'll look at it. I've never seen anything interesting about toddlercon. Otherwise, I'll stick to normal hentai.

as long as it is underage it is lolicon.

If her age ain't on the clock, shes ready for the cock.

there are some that go over the edge toddlercon for me is the red zone and pre-schoolers are in the gray zone anything above that is okay and after reading the comments I checked out mai-chan's daily life and after a chapter or two it didn't really bother me much and enjeru I couldn't find it before my scheduled figure hunt so I gave up looking for it.

Well I have different opinions about this topic what considers lolicon.
Where all of us can agree, child porn is really sick, involved with real children having sex. That's just not okay...

Strangely enough, I don't mind in the ecchi or hentai world where we see young girls in embarrassing situation or getting raped by a tentacle monsters.
As long as my brain and consciousness can distinguish reality from imagination such as characters drawn on a piece of paper (or CPU), I don't mind to see/read lolicon, no matter how old they are, as long those aren't babies (I mean, srsly who would get turned on by a baby .______." rather the parental instincts would be awake and not the horny side...).

But apparently I've heard or read some rumours that some guy got arrested because he had lolicon mangas and files on his computer and it was consider to the police as child porn although the guy had had only the fictional versions of loli and not with real people/children.

Finally to end this, it depends always how the artist want to draw his characters.
Mostly, the characters have sometimes the same age, but one of them looks like a 10 year child, who acts also like one, yet the Main Character gets in pervert situation with her where he gets turned etc etc etc

Or the another version, where 16 old girls have bodies of an 20 year old with huge breasts.

As we can see, it depends really how the artist wants to draw the lolis and the age is just made up, I mean, how would you define an age of a fictional character that doesn't exist? ^^

Toddlers.

#QQ

That's beyond the line.

As long as they can walk it's fair game, imo. It's hard to discern exact age with cartoons anyway, but babies would be weeeiiiird

For me personally, in hentai, the border would be around 10-12 years, I guess?
Also depends on the art style.

Anything under 12 or 13 is too young for me. If I feel like they don't understand what they are really doing by having sex then I'm taking advantage of them, which, in the immortal words of Chief Keef "i dont like"

So 14-15 is the sweet spot for me when they start to understand sex better. But I don't think that is even considered loli, is it?
More like young teen...

It's entirely dependant on how the artist draws it, hell it's possible for a character to be 30 as long as they are drawn to look younger.

For me, I'm not too fussed about how young the characters are as long as it's drawn well and I can get a boner.

it really depends on how it's drawn, and their height.

but i would generally say as a personal preference toddler-con. there generally isnt much distinguishing a girl baby and a boy baby anyhow

It's weird, but I'm more picky about the things other than lolita herself, considering age.

The creepiness of the situation must be suppressed by the "Forbidden Fruit" aspect. It's got to be playful and the younger party has got to be still somewhat mature and aware of the action. This does not mean I don't like a cute, innocent lolita.

The males have to be under 20, handsome or normal. I just don't like my hentai to be too grotesque. Which means Non-con (except yuri pairings), monster, guro, and bizarre, are too much for me.

I don't understand what's arousing about a child's body. Even if it's drawn why would you want to fap to the fantasy of a little girl having sex? You're an adult, why wouldn't you want to have fantasies about another adult? I'd really like to know what's the appeal of lolicon.

If you draw it with tits...well I'd have to see.

I usually tune out when it becomes toddlercon but theres nothing sweeter than a 9-12 YO loli! :P

It's simply cute vs sexy, in my opinion. I think there's a dormant dominator in my mind as well. I guess I'll admit I've yet to get that far with any lady, but I know myself pretty well at this point and can tell I'd like someone a bit submissive. In anime the look kind of gives off extra "innocence" perhaps, so it's just... I dunno, cuteness, inexperienced, etc factor lol.

I'm not the tallest guy around myself and grew up always liking shorter/petite chicks, so I guess it was just natural for me to gravitate towards this stuff eventually. Still a mood thing though, sometimes I'm in the mood for juicy tits, sometimes not.

The funny thing is how I've gotten more into this lately, but breast expansion as well. Polar opposites? ... lol.

Obviously my av/sigs give it away for me. Kantoku is the man (though current sig = Karory!)