We are currently experiencing payment processing issues. Our team is working to resolve the problem as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience
Upload earlier/older Hentai magazine issues
2
I was wondering if Fakku could possibly upload/publish earlier/older Hentai magazine issues for the Hentai magazines that they are already publishing on the site. The Hentai magazines I am talking about are Comic Kairakuten, Comic X-Eros, Comic Kairakuten BEAST, Comic Bavel, Comic Shitsurakuten, Comic Europa and Comic Happining (Vol. 1). I am talking about Hentai magazines that have some issues missing in-between and/or earlier issues that have been published but not uploaded. Starting all the way from Comic Kairakuten issue 2015-05, Comic X-Eros #29, Comic Kairakuten BEAST 2016-11, Comic Bavel 2017-05, Comic Shitsurakuten 2016-03 and Comic Europa Vol.10 to all the way back to the first magazine issue or at least as far as Fakku can go.
1
YQII
FAKKU Translator
Our contracts with most of our publishing partners only cover new magazines as of a certain starting date. This is because artists might leave a publisher or the industry as a whole, making it very hard to track them all down to make sure everyone gets compensated if we were to license older magazines. We've literally had people trekking through mountains in Japan to make it possible to bring over certain older titles to the West, and that's for a single artist.
Furthermore, we simply don't have the resources to go back and publish decades of older magazines while also keeping up with thousands of pages of new content each month. As such, it's always been our plan to focus our attention on new releases and expanding into other magazines when possible, rather than releasing older magazine content. That said, we do release older books from time, as those projects are a lot simpler to manage in this aspect.
I suggest reading the subscription FAQ to find out how far back each magazine goes, but feel free to ask if you have any further questions.
Furthermore, we simply don't have the resources to go back and publish decades of older magazines while also keeping up with thousands of pages of new content each month. As such, it's always been our plan to focus our attention on new releases and expanding into other magazines when possible, rather than releasing older magazine content. That said, we do release older books from time, as those projects are a lot simpler to manage in this aspect.
I suggest reading the subscription FAQ to find out how far back each magazine goes, but feel free to ask if you have any further questions.
0
YQII wrote...
Our contracts with most of our publishing partners only cover new magazines as of a certain starting date. This is because artists might leave a publisher or the industry as a whole, making it very hard to track them all down to make sure everyone gets compensated if we were to license older magazines. We've literally had people trekking through mountains in Japan to make it possible to bring over certain older titles to the West, and that's for a single artist.Furthermore, we simply don't have the resources to go back and publish decades of older magazines while also keeping up with thousands of pages of new content each month. As such, it's always been our plan to focus our attention on new releases and expanding into other magazines when possible, rather than releasing older magazine content. That said, we do release older books from time, as those projects are a lot simpler to manage in this aspect.
I suggest reading the subscription FAQ to find out how far back each magazine goes, but feel free to ask if you have any further questions.
Then why did Jacob made the announcement saying that they were excited for getting the Comic Koh License and how well the first volume did, then it became part of a rotating slot, and now is left in the dust based on what you said since you can't track artists? Also, I would appreciate that my comments don't get deleted for no reason since I never post anything that's worth deleting for. I simply pointed out that Fakku can't even keep up with their current lineup, so OP should not expect to get older releases anytime soon.
0
crispycreams
Your Local Pervert
jsojoo12 wrote...
Then why did Jacob made the announcement saying that they were excited for getting the Comic Koh License and how well the first volume did, then it became part of a rotating slot, and now is left in the dust based on what you said since you can't track artists? Also, I would appreciate that my comments don't get deleted for no reason since I never post anything that's worth deleting for. I simply pointed out that Fakku can't even keep up with their current lineup, so OP should not expect to get older releases anytime soon.
To be fair the rotating slot never meant they were gonna just do them at a constant rate when they rotated to a certain magazine, pretty sure it was always a if they have the spare time kinda thing. Considering Koh is back issued like crazy, it makes sense for them to focus on the more recent issues and not the older ones. Comic Aoha is the successor so in this sense these are in a way the current volumes of Koh. They have also been keeping up with its releases really well, having done every issue that has come out since Koh to completion. With an exception of the current release which they are probably still working on. So insinuating they cant keep up with their line up is a bit of a stretch.
-1
YQII
FAKKU Translator
I think you'll have to agree that a lot can change over the course of almost two years. We acquired the Koh license in early 2018, the magazine was then discontinued later that year, and finally relaunched as Aoha in early 2019. Aoha is a direct continuation of Koh in all but name, so it made more sense (in part due to the reasons listed above) to pick that up right from volume 1 rather than sticking with older Koh issues. This allows us to keep Aoha up to date and still pick up older Koh volumes when possible, compared to exclusively working on Koh and falling behind on Aoha.
I can understand someone preferring one magazine over the other, but that argument can be made either way. Given how similar the content is in the two magazines, I think it's more beneficial overall to focus our efforts on the brand new content.
I can understand someone preferring one magazine over the other, but that argument can be made either way. Given how similar the content is in the two magazines, I think it's more beneficial overall to focus our efforts on the brand new content.