Repeatedly commenting on new licenses with some variation of "this is X and I want Y" will no longer be tolerated, and those posts will simply be deleted.
This is not a blanket ban against all kinds of criticism. This is specifically targeting the practice of going to most new announcement threads and leaving a short message about how you're disappointed in the choice of license. We are fully aware that our users have a diverse range of preferences, and that not every new title will be appealing to everyone. And naturally, the more narrow your taste, the fewer titles will appeal to you. However, posting the same short message over and over again is a poor form of feedback, and mostly only serves to derail the conversation. This might not be your intent, but it's unfortunately often the end result, which is why I feel the need to put an end to it.
This commonly takes the form of "this is vanilla, and I want non-vanilla." Vanilla is a term with no set definition, and it will vary from one person to another. Recently, we
publicly shared our definition of the term as
"Happy sex with a romantic, sweet story. Typically involves a couple, or they end up together in the end." Historically, roughly 40% of the content of the site falls into this category, which I believe is a very reasonable amount.
However, those who strongly oppose vanilla tend to have a much broader definition, and use it as an umbrella term for anything not extreme. I don't find this catch-all version of the term particularly useful, but I can see why some do as a shorthand for saying "I want more extreme material." I understand the desire to have your preferences catered to, as there are many genres I'd like to see more of personally. But the problem is that this is a niche that's not catered to on an industry-wide level. To exemplify this, let's take a look at this recent tweet:
It's a simple breakdown of consensual (right column) vs. non-consensual (left) material in a number of popular ero manga magazines. The average comes out to 19% NC, but that number is skewed by a few magazines with a huge amount of this content, far outside what seems to be the norm. The median value of the same data is 12% NC. If you only look at the magazines we publish that are on that list, we get 13% average, and 11% median NC content.
You can't draw any definitive conclusions from a survey of such a limited scope, but it helps to illustrate my point: extreme content is not well-served in commercial magazines. There are a few niche magazines that specialize in a certain genre, but overall, the industry as a whole favor non-offensive material with a broad appeal—a revelation that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. The same way you see remakes, super hero franchises, and other "safe" movies coming out of Hollywood, the ero manga industry also sticks to a formula with a proven rate of success.
Finally, I have to acknowledge that this looks at NC content, which isn't necessarily the same as "non-vanilla" (as in, the broader definition of the term). I also don't know what criteria the author used to define NC in their research, so this data should only be treated as a rough estimate.
So what's the takeaway from all this? Well, we have to be selective in our pick of licenses, as we can only put out 22-24 books per year with our current two week release schedule. The books ultimately come from the magazines, so if we're picking from a pool of ~12% "non-vanilla" content, you can't expect more than 2-3 books of this nature each year. We also have to be extra picky with these titles, as we automatically limit our potential audience by choosing a niche genre. We can take more risk with mainstream content, but we don't choose our alternative titles willy-nilly. As a result, we only pick up one of those titles if we believe it will be a hit, and sometimes, that title just isn't there when browsing for potential new licenses.
That said, while nothing is final at this point, we're currently on track for hitting that quota of 2-3 "non-vanilla" titles for the year. If you're of the opinion that there's too much vanilla in the book lineup, hopefully these titles will be to your liking once they're announced later this year.