mibuchiha Posts

First post.

Oh, no. It will always be a dumpster.

...wut.

That which is love.

cinnamon = kayu manis.

............ >.>

I'd approve of emo kids rather than stupid hedonistic ones any day.

What a strange assertion. Define yourself then, without mentioning any external influence. People are simply the sum of their histories and the meaning they put on them.

Poor them if they grow as a fucked up people. Getting that treatment as a baby?

"This is the kind of "adults" I'm supposed to be in the future? Lolk."

Well... it doesn't appear much like a cliffhanger to me... simply terminated midway. More awkward than suspenseful. ~_~

Yes, it is a naturalist's fallacy. I'm aware of that all along, which is why I don't say it is morally wrong, but simply something very unrecommended. It's like being a totally uptight person. It's not wrong, but it's also very unpleasant to deal with. Subjective? Yes.

Also, I need to point out, that while I wouldn't call myself a feminist due to my opinion that their "equal rights" are not exactly equal, I do support the concept of equal rights regardless of gender. But I also see it as completely queer that they'd talk about things that is ideally voluntary and something both sides should work together willingly. Discussing about the distribution of workload? Very good. Thinking of it as "unpaid labor" (presumably with resentment) and demanding for an egalitarian pattern? ...no.

Morals defined too strictly, and we risk losing all the virtues that leads us to the urge to do and be good by ourselves and as ourselves.

I do agree that we can say fuck the violinist. But I'm still against abortion without any strong reason. And I am hoping you're not serious about the comparison.

Sex is biologically to produce offspring, for one. Going to opera is at best an immediate pleasure, something I see as very trivial to say the least. Alright, for the purpose of the discussion I'll simply accept the pleasures, and the need for those pleasures, of sex and opera, one is a direct result of our hormones etc and the other is just a matter of taste, are equal.

So, a question. This is the main problem of your argument to me. Are you really putting natural insemination and kidnapping and forced surgery on the same level? If that's what you're trying to say, then I admit I would be on constant guard if i ever need to get involved with you. I'm aware that my thoughts are all over the place, and I'm sure my argument is not well structured but... let's try giving an analogy.

Feminism. The article I read mentioned things about career opportunity etc. And how women are disadvantaged because of their disadvantages due to gender roles in a traditional family further preventing their chances in those fields. All is fine with the article, but when they started talking about raising their children as "unpaid labor", no matter how true it is in the strictest sense, I think they already lose sight of what makes marriage and family is such a beautiful thing, the feeling that makes life worth living.

I hope it reaches you, the message.

I just read the violinist argument. And I think it's not a good comparison to make. There is a very important difference I see between the cases. A baby in a mother's womb is very different from another person glued to you like a Siamese twin. The degree of suffering is very very different. The events leading to pregnancy and the violinist case are very different too. One involves, to a good extent, choice by the pregnant person. We can argue that the pregnancy itself wasn't intended, but it merely meant she was not taking enough precaution against it before engaging in acts that pregnancy is the natural consequence of. To step on the fetus' right to continued life and care in that case screams utter irresponsibility to me. For the violinist case, there was no choice from the one the kidney is being used. The person also did not do anything close to the events that would lead to him being forced into such a situation. He was completely forced into it, and he has no knowledge that such an event is possible. It is acceptable for him to exercise his rights since the simple fact that he was forced into the situation means his rights was violated.

Unless if we're talking about abortion due to rape. Which I'm pretty sure not what we're discussing now.

We need a new law that makes sure only those that can prove they're humans get these job.

Eh. This is exactly why I would want to avoid letting some strangers handle my kids at all costs if possible.

To think that I actually had some respect for the OP before.

They dont just bind those babies, some even got their mouths taped.

I wish I'm there to punch the workers' faces so hard my hand bleeds.

Hmm. First, the length of each part. Too short, and lacking content. Instead of a story I see this more like a hentai manga, sex with some bits of plot sprinkled here and there.

Secondly, how you choose to end each part is strange. Part 2 for example, feels terminated midway. The first paragraph of part 2 would be better used to end part 1.

That said, I think it is erotic enough. Though I would prefer less vulgarity (I'm one of those that loves my erotica without all the slut etc) but given the context, I think it is acceptable. Looking forward to more.

thought: =3=

word: love

They got busted. And that vid was leaked as proof.

Yeah it's local. Near us, even. For fuck's sake, people are just cruel.