mibuchiha Posts
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
I'm not religious, but good stuff is good.
English ver!
English ver!
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
For now, a world where people say "Don't judge" in large text less often.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
I'm keeping your right then. Make sure it's properly frozen.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Not enough to provide a jolt. try harder ite.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Too vague.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Hey shane, being wondering about several things.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
I'll try to answer this in the fewest possible word.
1) Is a God necessary?
...for? Whatever you may answer this question with, you can probably find other things that serve the purpose as good as, if not better than god. So unless if you can come up with a purpose that only god can serve, answer is no.
2) Does morality exist?
As an objective value, no. Morality is always defined with respect to a particular point of view and as such it cannot be objective. It may be the view that most adopt but numbers doesn't add to validity. As a subjective thing? Definitely.
3) What is the value of art? (Hentai included of course)
That which lets us feel things beyond our basic needs. As those are catered to we naturally seek a higher form of stimulation and that is art.
4) Is there a meaning of life?
No. It only has meaning in the purpose you set and/or accept from others for yourself. Life has no a priori meaning other than it being a set of physical phenomena that are able to replicate itself.
5) If there's no God will that lead to the collapse of morality?
Are good things good because gods do them or do gods do things because they are good? If it's the former, than good is just whatever that drive the whims of gods, which, when we refer to the scriptures, would be difficult to find agreeable. If it's the latter, then we obviously need no god since we can just refer directly to those good things.
Either way, the fact that we are able to agree or disagree shows that we have our definition of morality which is independent of god, therefore the lack of god won't cause it to collapse.
6) Are utopia's possible?
Depending on how you define it. If it's defined as a world where everyone is happy, then probably no. Some people do become happy on the suffering of others. Or well, maybe we can make a mind control device to forcibly turn everyone happy, but even if it agrees with the definition of utopia, it'll force the issue of free will and so on...
Probably impossible.
1) Is a God necessary?
...for? Whatever you may answer this question with, you can probably find other things that serve the purpose as good as, if not better than god. So unless if you can come up with a purpose that only god can serve, answer is no.
2) Does morality exist?
As an objective value, no. Morality is always defined with respect to a particular point of view and as such it cannot be objective. It may be the view that most adopt but numbers doesn't add to validity. As a subjective thing? Definitely.
3) What is the value of art? (Hentai included of course)
That which lets us feel things beyond our basic needs. As those are catered to we naturally seek a higher form of stimulation and that is art.
4) Is there a meaning of life?
No. It only has meaning in the purpose you set and/or accept from others for yourself. Life has no a priori meaning other than it being a set of physical phenomena that are able to replicate itself.
5) If there's no God will that lead to the collapse of morality?
Are good things good because gods do them or do gods do things because they are good? If it's the former, than good is just whatever that drive the whims of gods, which, when we refer to the scriptures, would be difficult to find agreeable. If it's the latter, then we obviously need no god since we can just refer directly to those good things.
Either way, the fact that we are able to agree or disagree shows that we have our definition of morality which is independent of god, therefore the lack of god won't cause it to collapse.
6) Are utopia's possible?
Depending on how you define it. If it's defined as a world where everyone is happy, then probably no. Some people do become happy on the suffering of others. Or well, maybe we can make a mind control device to forcibly turn everyone happy, but even if it agrees with the definition of utopia, it'll force the issue of free will and so on...
Probably impossible.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Life is great most of the time.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
mibuchiha wrote...
Anyone, come up with something, a topic, suggestion, proposition etc that would fire me up to talk about it and/or shoot it down.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
You guys are too peaceful.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Damn. Even the reason.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Thought so.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Ite or Fallan, come up with something, a topic, suggestion, proposition etc that would fire me up to talk about it and/or shoot it down.
I doubt Fallan can though.
I doubt Fallan can though.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
I need to wake up earlier to try to pay him.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Still, it is a useful thing to learn.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Good.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Some community uses j, especially the electrical ones to avoid confusion with I the current.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
lol. only in the case of rare interesting ones.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
But they have strong attracting factors, which restricts the pattern of their behavior more than any constant can do to a physical system.
Constants just fix the values, not the pattern.
Constants just fix the values, not the pattern.
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Let's try giving an answer to this. First, letting the rage out...
I find it deeply offensive that Fate/Zero and sao are mentioned in the same sentence.
Ok, now to the answer. Either way is fine. There is no best POV, as it depends on how you go on describing the events in the plot. It is important to note that each perspective has its pros and cons, dos and don'ts and often, the choice boils down to which style you are more comfortable with. For example, writing in first person you need to watch out not to jump between perspective (realistically no one can mindread) etc while in third person you need to stay in the neutral and write it narrative instead of thoughts. Again, it depends on the plot itself and how you choose to present it.
That said, I'm curious. Why do you choose to capitalize some words in your posts?
I find it deeply offensive that Fate/Zero and sao are mentioned in the same sentence.
Ok, now to the answer. Either way is fine. There is no best POV, as it depends on how you go on describing the events in the plot. It is important to note that each perspective has its pros and cons, dos and don'ts and often, the choice boils down to which style you are more comfortable with. For example, writing in first person you need to watch out not to jump between perspective (realistically no one can mindread) etc while in third person you need to stay in the neutral and write it narrative instead of thoughts. Again, it depends on the plot itself and how you choose to present it.
That said, I'm curious. Why do you choose to capitalize some words in your posts?