Reputation...

This forum has the unique feature of having both positive and negative reputation. The more unique aspect of this feature is the ease in which a user can achieve positive reputation or negative reputation.

I have been to many other forums and its either positive reputation or no reputation. On the few sites I've been where you had both, it was very rare for there to be active users with negative reputation.

As I had stated previously, the real unique aspect of this feature is the ease in which users can achieve positive and negative reputation. Often, reputation isn't a number but more or less points. So after you get a specific amount of points you'd go up or down a reputation level.

I feel Fakku! has a very blunt reputation system, a system superior to many others.


What you just read, or skipped, holds no real importance to this thread.

I am merely making this thread to clarify that there is nothing wrong with negative reputation. Some users prefer to have negative reputation for their own reasons while others prefer positive reputation for their own reasons.

I prefer negative reputation. Users have found that giving me positive reputation is the equivalent to giving me negative reputation and they are correct in doing so.

Isn't that odd...?

People punish me with positive reputation.


I make this thread with the sole purpose of saying I find nothing wrong with negative reputation and hope some other users quit being so "extreme" over reputation.

If someone gives you negative reputation, who gives a fuck?

If a user has negative reputation, does that make them a person to avoid?

While I have negative reputation for that very reason, other users aren't in the same boat as me. Quit judging users, other than me, by their reputation.


You'll take the high road and I'll take the low road

I thought I mentioned that I am a user to avoid, implying just that...



Its funny. Up until I wanted negative reputation I stood at eight positive reputation, not much but its still positive.

I went under because I wanted to and went out of my way to act in a manner that would receive negative reputation.


Perhaps you missed my four, "Just as planned..." I would have assumed they'd show just how overjoyed I was at receiving negative reputation.

Chillax bro.

Well I suppose if you read past that line you'd see it was my personal preference.

I do understand how reading something that conflicts with yer' point is bothersome but really...

Suffer through it.

Well I didn't do it to impress other users.

Its simply easier to get negative reputation and I prefer larger numbers over smaller numbers.

Well since I'm negative I don't want to be no bitch.

Editors privilege.

You tsundere you!



You are mistaken. I was going for over ten reputation when I started posting regularly in "Specific Anime Series" where I was often given negative reputation for having opposing views on the series being discussed.

While a specific user helped me out and kept me positive from all the negative I got in there, balanced it out, I realized I'd never get into the forties the way I was posting.

I spent a good while trying to act in a manner that would deserve reputation but the farthest I made was eight. It was then that I said to myself, "negative reputation is superior, larger numbers and I don't need to bother myself over what other users think about me."

While it took quite some time I finally reached negative reputation and made this thread.


You make intelligent posts, Ethil. If I didn't feel this way I'd simply reply with...