Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
0
What do you guys think about it? I was really disappointed with this one (Half Blood Prince). It was as if the director had never opened the book before. It was so full of errors and someone who enjoyed the book like I had was really pissed by them. I know it'll be better to break this movie (Deathly Hallows) into four parts? but that doesn't change the fact that I kind of hate it. I mean they're just trying to make more money and I know the damn parts will be a couple years or months between one another.
0
Isn't that how it is? They only want to get money and because they are losing money they (instead of concentrating on what matters) they try to "improve" the movie by adding crap.
Read the book and I liked it. Though the book has something all the Harry Potter books which make it shall we say... Optimistic? Always going on about love and family puts it off the story majority of the time and in a way it seems to be amplified in the movies.
Though I'm not too sure about breaking it into parts. Sure the book is long, but its not "That" long is it? I mean I read it in 3 days.
Anywho I still want to see it. Though I wont have my hopes up.
Read the book and I liked it. Though the book has something all the Harry Potter books which make it shall we say... Optimistic? Always going on about love and family puts it off the story majority of the time and in a way it seems to be amplified in the movies.
Though I'm not too sure about breaking it into parts. Sure the book is long, but its not "That" long is it? I mean I read it in 3 days.
Anywho I still want to see it. Though I wont have my hopes up.
0
I actually think David Yates did a good job in both 'Order of the Phoenix' and 'Half-Blood Prince'. Better than the third and fourth movies, in my opinion. For me, it's not about recreating every little detail in the book when making a movie, but rather, about being able to convey the essence of the plot through a cinematic expression.
Sure, there are some important details from the books that were not shown in the movie, but if every single one of them were, the movie would end up looking even more rushed and complicated.
As for the upcoming two parts of Deathly Hallows, I'm pretty much psyched to see them and I don't think they separated the movie into two parts just for the sake of money. Besides, that at least makes more sense than the rumor going around that 'Breaking Dawn' of the Twilight Saga would also be filmed into two parts. -_-"
Sure, there are some important details from the books that were not shown in the movie, but if every single one of them were, the movie would end up looking even more rushed and complicated.
As for the upcoming two parts of Deathly Hallows, I'm pretty much psyched to see them and I don't think they separated the movie into two parts just for the sake of money. Besides, that at least makes more sense than the rumor going around that 'Breaking Dawn' of the Twilight Saga would also be filmed into two parts. -_-"
0
Harontiar wrote...
This is the last part, right?Then I think they would make this an epic one.
It sure looks pretty epic if you whatch the trailer, however Seven months between the two parts is far from epic it's pure stupidity... anyway looks to be the best one.
so the tube tags don't work atm , ill just link to it instead
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows HD Trailer
0
Renovartio wrote...
I mean I read it in 3 days.I read it in one >:D
I, a fan of the books, have always had problems with the movies. That being said, they are movies, and the one directing the movie has to balance between personal interpretation and making a movie appealing to different audiences, not just the fans. Unfortunately, since the books are so long, and half the reason why everyone who are fans of the series are because they are able to be immersed in this new world. The movies attempt to feed off of that in terms of making money, but unfortunately their annoying little habits of picking out parts of the books in order to make sure the story doesn't drag tend to detract from the experience.
Significantly.
DAMN YOU HOLLYWOOD AND YOUR INABILITY TO CREATE A HARRY POTTER MOVIE WORTH MY TIME!!!
0
Renovartio wrote...
Isn't that how it is? They only want to get money and because they are losing money they (instead of concentrating on what matters) they try to "improve" the movie by adding crap. Read the book and I liked it. Though the book has something all the Harry Potter books which make it shall we say... Optimistic? Always going on about love and family puts it off the story majority of the time and in a way it seems to be amplified in the movies.
Though I'm not too sure about breaking it into parts. Sure the book is long, but its not "That" long is it? I mean I read it in 3 days.
Anywho I still want to see it. Though I wont have my hopes up.
it may not be long but there is so much action more or less packed into it. but still. i rather watch a 4 hour movie then have to wait 6 mounths to "finish it"
0
tofu wrote...
Renovartio wrote...
I mean I read it in 3 days.I read it in one >:D
It's obvious you have [not] been laid. c:
0
Zirpurze wrote...
tofu wrote...
Renovartio wrote...
I mean I read it in 3 days.I read it in one >:D
It's obvious you have [not] been laid. c:
Because people who can finish a children's book in a day are obvious virgins?
