2+2=4
0
quote wrote...
The phrase "two plus two equals five" ("2 + 2 = 5") is a slogan used in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four[1] as an example of an obviously false dogma one must believe, similar to other obviously false slogans by the Party in Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is contrasted with the phrase "two plus two makes four", the obvious – but politically inexpedient – truth. Orwell's protagonist, Winston Smith, uses the phrase to wonder if the State might declare "two plus two equals five" as a fact; he ponders whether, if everybody believes in it, does that make it true? Smith writes, "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." Later in the novel, Smith attempts to use doublethink to teach himself that the statement "2 + 2 = 5" is true, or at least as true as any other answer one could come up with.
0
Zak wrote...
quote wrote...
The phrase "two plus two equals five" ("2 + 2 = 5") is a slogan used in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four[1] as an example of an obviously false dogma one must believe, similar to other obviously false slogans by the Party in Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is contrasted with the phrase "two plus two makes four", the obvious – but politically inexpedient – truth. Orwell's protagonist, Winston Smith, uses the phrase to wonder if the State might declare "two plus two equals five" as a fact; he ponders whether, if everybody believes in it, does that make it true? Smith writes, "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." Later in the novel, Smith attempts to use doublethink to teach himself that the statement "2 + 2 = 5" is true, or at least as true as any other answer one could come up with.SHIT SO SERIOUSCHE.
0
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
uh. yeah. did anyone not know this? is this some 4chan meme im missing?This existed before 4chan, ne?
0
Kona-chan wrote...
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
uh. yeah. did anyone not know this? is this some 4chan meme im missing?This existed before 4chan, ne?
yeah, the 1984 thing, but i thought maybe there was something else at work. it seems really weird to just bring it up at random.
im assuming someone just now read the book and had to flaunt it (congrats, i guess)
0
And 1+1= A window, also 1+1= 2
therefore 2 = A window
A Window will be refered to from now on as X
X+X= 4, therefore 4 = 2X
reversing any equation will give you equal results
eg. 1+1=2 is the same as 2-1=1 (reverse equation and replace addition with subtraction or multiplication with division)
1x2=2 therefore 2/2=1, 2x5=10 therefore 10/5=2
4x0=0 therefore 0/0=4
0=4, 4=2X therefore 0=2X
Windows=0, therefore I have proven with mathematical theory that there is no such thing as windows!
therefore 2 = A window
A Window will be refered to from now on as X
X+X= 4, therefore 4 = 2X
reversing any equation will give you equal results
eg. 1+1=2 is the same as 2-1=1 (reverse equation and replace addition with subtraction or multiplication with division)
1x2=2 therefore 2/2=1, 2x5=10 therefore 10/5=2
4x0=0 therefore 0/0=4
0=4, 4=2X therefore 0=2X
Windows=0, therefore I have proven with mathematical theory that there is no such thing as windows!
0
This is what /ib/'s fallen to? Math and 1984 shit? I miss the old days when it was about lolis and necrophilia. :'(
0
Chio wrote...
And 1+1= A window, also 1+1= 2therefore 2 = A window
A Window will be refered to from now on as X
X+X= 4, therefore 4 = 2X
reversing any equation will give you equal results
eg. 1+1=2 is the same as 2-1=1 (reverse equation and replace addition with subtraction or multiplication with division)
1x2=2 therefore 2/2=1, 2x5=10 therefore 10/5=2
4x0=0 therefore 0/0=4
0=4, 4=2X therefore 0=2X
Windows=0, therefore I have proven with mathematical theory that there is no such thing as windows!
At the cost of the universe imploding.
0
Callonia wrote...
Personally I prefer 2+2+1=5 because that way I'll get four girls added to me. Nice line :)
Look at I started with my 2+2=5 post.
0
Hentanize wrote...
Jean-Claude Van Damme has it right:1+1=1
Jean-Claude Van Damme had it right:
"THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!!"
0
MoneyDRuffy wrote...
Chio wrote...
And 1+1= A window, also 1+1= 2therefore 2 = A window
A Window will be refered to from now on as X
X+X= 4, therefore 4 = 2X
reversing any equation will give you equal results
eg. 1+1=2 is the same as 2-1=1 (reverse equation and replace addition with subtraction or multiplication with division)
1x2=2 therefore 2/2=1, 2x5=10 therefore 10/5=2
4x0=0 therefore 0/0=4
0=4, 4=2X therefore 0=2X
Windows=0, therefore I have proven with mathematical theory that there is no such thing as windows!
At the cost of the universe imploding.
roflmao. i don't know what to believe anymore
