[Locked] Chyea nigga
0
animefreak_usa wrote...
Boy.. your dense as a rock. I said 'win over', like german was going to lose but the japs was still strong. Refocus the theater to the asian front. So if i said japan was or is going to defeat the germans.. then you would be correct. Also... hitler was a racist.. he didn't like asians. Why did he associate with the japs? Oh because nationalism and a strong backing since the japanese are way more zenophobies then the Aryan ideals. Ever read a book or a essay on the japanese mind set and their ideals on human right via 1920's.. fuck Mengele would be disgusted with Tojo. The nazi's were much kinder to the jews then the japanese with china, korea, russian, british, flips, american pow and fuck.. the Ryukyujins. Also since you brought up nazi/soviet propaganda.. you know Nazism is a form of communism.. right. National socialist german workers party. except socialism isn't a fan of unions... are they. Fuck you know stain and Hitler's was friends until Hitler wanted the Europa idea.. one untited europe.. which is a part of slavic Territory aka eastern europe.Also your allied chart of country is false... half of those counties never fought nor send troops, aid or even words of kindness.. they just followed the big stick. Plus you can classified ussr as a allied county until 1943 when they asked for help because old' kaus was whopping that ass with coo coo clocks inefficiency.
the ccp - communist party of china, is called communist - yet is not communist
1% of german people held more wealth then 99% and funded hitlers regime
in doing so they slapped the words socialist party on there, it was not socialist, 1% held all the wealth (privately owned, its only socialism if the government has the money, not the bankers) the government gives money to fund social programs;
unless you want to call the king of england back in the day socialist for feeding his soldiers and peasants, the peasants who he paid and who worked for him, and the soldiers who fought for him; either way it was his wealth that went around
not any set governments
a tyrant has to feed and clothe his people does he not? or else the empire would collapse and the kingdom would be doomed - not out of the goodness of his heart either
the fact that the super rich elite in nazi germany fed and clothed people who couldn't offord to do it themselves, all that did - was give them a little bit of hope while legally owning their asses; it was slavery at best
if you give their children schooling, and them work, a home, food on the table
they will die for you; even if their soldiers are fighting and dying for nationalism; for their pride; but in reality, tis for oil
people will support any kind of madness if they have something to lose
that's why so many support america today;
socialism is when the government uses money out of its own treasury to help fund social programs, such as health care, housing, and welfare
if super rich dominate super poor, that's the dictionary definition of a tyrant(s)
giving the poorest something to lose, something to stand for however mad and evil;
if they have that glimmer of hope that they have a future, they will stand for anything no matter how cruelly they are abused;
comparing nazism to communism for a false name wow...just ... wow
you know the two ideologies are diametrically opposed right?
like america germany had a "anything but communism" mentality

On a side note like today people immigrated to germany from all over the world,"for a better life" in world war II germany was america; it was the superpower
it had the biggest army - the highest levels of nationalist capitalist pride (by the corporations for the corporations, we shall make the world a police state!)
it had the cockiest citizens
communism was for the people by the people; bad leaders screwed with both sides of the way...too bad lenin had to die he was such a good man; he would have never became a dictator like stalin mao or che guevera
instead of USA USA USA
it used to be HEIL HITLER HEIL HITLER HEIL HITLER
but the concept and mindset was the same; different times - same shit...
also its not my density, you didn't make yourself clear;
"win over"
define:win over convert: make (someone) agree, understand, or realize the truth or validity of something; "He had finally convinced several customers of the advantages of his product"
its out of context, so i assumed you meant that the japanese were planning an invasion after the allies took back france - forgive me for being "dense"
next time say what you mean, and make yourself clear
The same motherfucking thing :P
in communism
THERE ARE NO RICH PEOPLE
in germany the rich fed and clothed the poor, at what cost?
WORK HARDER WORK FASTER, REGULATIONS REGULATIONS REGULAIONS, WANT TO BE HOMELESS?
pressure pressure pressure; it wasn't socialism either, just a dictatorship that abused its poor
0
animefreak_usa
Child of Samael
A. Their a Communist party everywhere.. doesn't mean they are the party of the leader. Is the Republican party.. the party of the republic or is it just a name. Same with the Democratic party except.. that just the anti federalist party mixed with the wig party. Which is weird because the Republican party is anti federalist.. strange.. oh wait political parties are just cleaver ways to unconditionally enforce one core groups views on their ideas and not the peoples.
B. Stating soviet ideas in conjunction with reality.. nice... except all nations has a elite class.. our rich people.. your marxist socicommunist party members. You believe that your ideas and the communist nations before and now are the same. I hear a smugleaf users laughter and trademark '...' Soviet citizen were more poorer then half the world popuation. Because the wealth wasn't there nor was the less then 1% of the elite class giveth a shit of the proletariat masses. Really the 1% chatter.. ha more like 3%. Leave the bongo drums outside please. Except for a fact the soviet economy and welfare system was Mexico class after Stalin second five year plan. from 47 to 92... the avg soviet citizen bearly had food.. and that wasn't the poor.. it was the middle class and outer party memebers too. Now that was influx during the last three premiers regin when they actually tried to fix it and Lenin did a good job fixing the government. Not all communist ideal or functions was in vain... just the area was too big to use a form of local socialecon government.. Vietnam is a great example of that... actually the most free of the marxist governments. China is going to fail unless it opens it up.. the different between chinese communist and whatever it is now is.. it fucking works now.
C. Still a fact the only difference between nazism and marxism is... well nothing just fascism with a economical term.
If marxism so great... why did it die out in 92-95 and go from 40 up counties to 4 plus 2 semi marxist?
B. Stating soviet ideas in conjunction with reality.. nice... except all nations has a elite class.. our rich people.. your marxist socicommunist party members. You believe that your ideas and the communist nations before and now are the same. I hear a smugleaf users laughter and trademark '...' Soviet citizen were more poorer then half the world popuation. Because the wealth wasn't there nor was the less then 1% of the elite class giveth a shit of the proletariat masses. Really the 1% chatter.. ha more like 3%. Leave the bongo drums outside please. Except for a fact the soviet economy and welfare system was Mexico class after Stalin second five year plan. from 47 to 92... the avg soviet citizen bearly had food.. and that wasn't the poor.. it was the middle class and outer party memebers too. Now that was influx during the last three premiers regin when they actually tried to fix it and Lenin did a good job fixing the government. Not all communist ideal or functions was in vain... just the area was too big to use a form of local socialecon government.. Vietnam is a great example of that... actually the most free of the marxist governments. China is going to fail unless it opens it up.. the different between chinese communist and whatever it is now is.. it fucking works now.
C. Still a fact the only difference between nazism and marxism is... well nothing just fascism with a economical term.
If marxism so great... why did it die out in 92-95 and go from 40 up counties to 4 plus 2 semi marxist?
0
Gism88 wrote...
You silly humans and your "Governments". Capitalists, Communists, Socialists. You all seek to destroy yourselves, but blame one another.
There is no "right" answer.
This.
Seriously, I'm not usually going to say this but everyone needs to seriously chill the fuck out. Bafoonery is one thing, but this is starting to feel like legitimate hate.
I will report this if I must.
0
animefreak_usa wrote...
A. Their a Communist party everywhere.. doesn't mean they are the party of the leader. Is the Republican party.. the party of the republic or is it just a name. Same with the Democratic party except.. that just the anti federalist party mixed with the wig party. Which is weird because the Republican party is anti federalist.. strange.. oh wait political parties are just cleaver ways to unconditionally enforce one core groups views on their ideas and not the peoples.B. Stating soviet ideas in conjunction with reality.. nice... except all nations has a elite class.. our rich people.. your marxist socicommunist party members. You believe that your ideas and the communist nations before and now are the same. I hear a smugleaf users laughter and trademark '...' Soviet citizen were more poorer then half the world popuation. Because the wealth wasn't there nor was the less then 1% of the elite class giveth a shit of the proletariat masses. Really the 1% chatter.. ha more like 3%. Leave the bongo drums outside please. Except for a fact the soviet economy and welfare system was Mexico class after Stalin second five year plan. from 47 to 92... the avg soviet citizen bearly had food.. and that wasn't the poor.. it was the middle class and outer party memebers too. Now that was influx during the last three premiers regin when they actually tried to fix it and Lenin did a good job fixing the government. Not all communist ideal or functions was in vain... just the area was too big to use a form of local socialecon government.. Vietnam is a great example of that... actually the most free of the marxist governments. China is going to fail unless it opens it up.. the different between chinese communist and whatever it is now is.. it fucking works now.
C. Still a fact the only difference between nazism and marxism is... well nothing just fascism with a economical term.
If marxism so great... why did it die out in 92-95 and go from 40 up counties to 4 plus 2 semi marxist?
a mixture of bad soviet leaders who didnt give a crap about the people
and economic sanctions by the us and its allies;
america took out the soviet union economically
well with the exception of vietnam
they fake an attack on one of their ships to justify war in nam
and then when the gulf of tonkin didn't happen (apparently a vietcom ship blew up an american ship, later it was revealed as one big lie, things like that make me question 9/11, i won't outright say "inside job" but i question the validity of it)
essentially america used a false flagging (one that never really happened anyway)
to justify war with vietnam killing 48,000 of their own;
that was vietnam
the rest of the soviet union, were sanctioned;
by war, capitalism sanctioned oil exports and imports within the soviet union
taking advantage of bad leadership and tyranny in the soviet union to stop people trading with them;
it didn't fall on its own; and could have worked as a wonderful system
why did it fail? capitalism got in the way pure and simple;
there was the world war, bad leaders being funded by capitalist bankers(stalin and mao were funded by the rotschild family, their bad leadership almost led to economic collapse they needed a bailout, and agreed to stay passive while nazi troops plowed through russia to get to the iraqi oil sands, ironic isnt it that the rotschild family bailed america out of the great depression in 45 along with 11 other nazi banking families who left germany unconvicted, starting the war on communism and eventually reaching iraq through bush, one thing leads to another), the cold war - etc
0
Lollikittie wrote...
Gism88 wrote...
You silly humans and your "Governments". Capitalists, Communists, Socialists. You all seek to destroy yourselves, but blame one another.
There is no "right" answer.
This.
Seriously, I'm not usually going to say this but everyone needs to seriously chill the fuck out. Bafoonery is one thing, but this is starting to feel like legitimate hate.
I will report this if I must.
yeah sure you are right, i'll go take a nap then check out some other threads when i wake up
p.s sorry for double post all
0
SovietArcher wrote...
yeah sure you are right, i'll go take a nap then check out some other threads when i wake up
p.s sorry for double post all
Appreciated.
0
If this this thread were in SD, I probably would have tried to read the OP's long-ass responses.
But its not, therefore...

But its not, therefore...

0
animefreak_usa
Child of Samael
Where the hate kitten? I just like arguing. Just has a last thought.. their was no sanctions on the USSR via economical or financial. Just a boycott in two Olympics and U.N. sanctions for Afghanistan. The fucked up thing is.. we also didn't even help the Mujahideen. Fucked up thing is if the russians didn't invade or if we help with equipment to the Mujahideen... 9/11 would not happen nor a Iranian fighting. Weird because the Mujahideen was mostly freedom fighter but also terrorist after the soviets left and iran and paki mullahs because the leaders... also weird enough the other group who was fighting the Taliban they were the same group. Now the arabs... their just crazy. Nothing but the jews not going home to the homeland could of change that.
I had my fun. I will not post here anymore. I just wait for Graceful D.. not good day.
I had my fun. I will not post here anymore. I just wait for Graceful D.. not good day.
0
animefreak_usa wrote...
Where the hate kitten? I just like arguing. Just has a last thought.. their was no sanctions on the USSR via economical or financial. Just a boycott in two Olympics and U.N. sanctions for Afghanistan. The fucked up thing is.. we also didn't even help the Mujahideen. Fucked up thing is if the russians didn't invade or if we help with equipment to the Mujahideen... 9/11 would not happen nor a Iranian fighting. Weird because the Mujahideen was mostly freedom fighter but also terrorist after the soviets left and iran and paki mullahs because the leaders... also weird enough the other group who was fighting the Taliban they were the same group. Now the arabs... their just crazy. Nothing but the jews not going home to the homeland could of change that.I had my fun. I will not post here anymore. I just wait for Graceful D.. not good day.
she was talking about me
0
SovietArcher wrote...
say what! wrote...
SovietArcher wrote...
say what! wrote...
SovietArcher wrote...
say what! wrote...
Go away you tried to get me banned.umad?
go away... umad communism will never work?
that's why all the capitalist economies are going under yea?
umad that I don't give a fuck?
nah, you'll starve off and die when the american currency goes under;
i'll still get my food rations
ignorance is bliss until shit goes down :)
and the american economy? more reliant on china then you might think
owning 90% of us debt they've got you by the balls
you'd better hope your crappy nation can take afghanistan, they are after the opium there after all, 97% of the worlds opiate farms are in afghanistan
and what do buddhists smoke to meditate? that's right opium
how many people live in china?
control the opium, control china; eventually there will be a war, you've already lost america the world does not like you :)
just sayin;
Hah funny thing with that is even WITH your economy the starvation index is at 54%. Now when your only country of export for industry and the place where you import 79% goes under, imagine where you will be. The only resource other than willpower,perseverance, and freedom that can't be diminished by anything less than nuclear holocaust would be our agricultural-centric industries. We can sustain ourselves, now the question is all these communist countries who already fail terribly in the status quo. Who gives a fuck if were in debt, it's not like china has the balls , or any country for that matter, to call us out even if we start getting late in our payments as they wouldn't want to risk a trade war.
Nice opium speculation btw. But unfortunately all that we need to control china is a hair trigger launch system, some boats out in the yellow sea, and a nice little thing called a tariff.
0
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Isn't like almost 2/3 of our debt owned to ourselves? China and Japan will be content as long as we can pay interest. Implying that China would go to war with the US is ridiculous, especially over OPIUM.
The agricultural industries in the US isn't a pushover by any means.
We're also not fighting the people Afghanistan. More like we're acting as "the police" in many areas. Although not to say there isn't any tension between Afghan people/police and the US military.
The agricultural industries in the US isn't a pushover by any means.
We're also not fighting the people Afghanistan. More like we're acting as "the police" in many areas. Although not to say there isn't any tension between Afghan people/police and the US military.