[Locked] FAKKU Cafe'
0
Rovencrone wrote...
firestar wrote...
n-no i live for science......its not i'm bad at math i just hate it
science without math? I hope you're not talking chemistry here.
i'm talking about all sciences...i'm good at math....but i hate it
0
Fallan
Kamen Rider Cheeki
Rovencrone wrote...
[size=29]MIBUPHYSICS VS. FALLANOSOPHYWHO WILL WIN?!?![/h]
Me obviously
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
firestar wrote...
Rovencrone wrote...
firestar wrote...
n-no i live for science......its not i'm bad at math i just hate it
science without math? I hope you're not talking chemistry here.
i'm talking about all sciences...i'm good at math....but i hate it
what's there to hate in math?
@nana: so, which branch of philosophy will we be discussing?
0
mibuchiha wrote...
firestar wrote...
Rovencrone wrote...
[quote="firestar"]n-no i live for science......its not i'm bad at math i just hate it
science without math? I hope you're not talking chemistry here.
i'm talking about all sciences...i'm good at math....but i hate it
what's there to hate in math?
all the numbers thats what....
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
firestar wrote...
what's there to hate in math?all the numbers thats what....
..............
*facepalms*
@nana: religion? that's boring. something false is false, that's it. >_>
philosophy eh? ok, let's talk about how to interpret the concept of probabilities in quantum mechanics...
0
firestar wrote...
mibuchiha wrote...
firestar wrote...
Rovencrone wrote...
[quote="firestar"]n-no i live for science......its not i'm bad at math i just hate it
science without math? I hope you're not talking chemistry here.
i'm talking about all sciences...i'm good at math....but i hate it
what's there to hate in math?
all the numbers thats what....
Nope it's definitely all the lines...=_=
0
Fallan
Kamen Rider Cheeki
mibuchiha wrote...
firestar wrote...
what's there to hate in math?all the numbers thats what....
..............
*facepalms*
Did he just-
0
mibuchiha wrote...
firestar wrote...
what's there to hate in math?all the numbers thats what....
..............
*facepalms*
@nana: religion? that's boring. something false is false, that's it. >_>
philosophy eh? ok, let's talk about how to interpret the concept of probabilities in quantum mechanics...
0
mibuchiha wrote...
firestar wrote...
what's there to hate in math?all the numbers thats what....
..............
*facepalms*
@nana: religion? that's boring. something false is false, that's it. >_>
philosophy eh? ok, let's talk about how to interpret the concept of probabilities in quantum mechanics...
Mibupysics: 1
Fallanosophy: 0
0
Fallan
Kamen Rider Cheeki
mibuchiha wrote...
firestar wrote...
what's there to hate in math?all the numbers thats what....
..............
*facepalms*
@nana: religion? that's boring. something false is false, that's it. >_>
philosophy eh? ok, let's talk about how to interpret the concept of probabilities in quantum mechanics...
Ooooookay,=m fire.
0
Harmonian wrote...
Roven, why did you go from a decent avatar to a shit awful avatar?Why do you give a shit?
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
ok, let's see... how do we begin. which camp are you in? copenhagen or many-world interpretation?
0
Fallan
Kamen Rider Cheeki
mibuchiha wrote...
ok, let's see... how do we begin. which camp are you in? copenhagen or many-world interpretation?wats the many world one? copenhagen is to math-y. I mean, can't exactly pinpoint this, yadda, its just probability cause its impossible to pinpoint yadda
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Fallan wrote...
mibuchiha wrote...
ok, let's see... how do we begin. which camp are you in? copenhagen or many-world interpretation?wats the many world one? copenhagen is to math-y.
copenhagen: things don't occupy a single, definite state until they're observed.
many-world: all possibilities in the probabilities happen in different branches or reality.
0
Fallan
Kamen Rider Cheeki
mibuchiha wrote...
Fallan wrote...
mibuchiha wrote...
ok, let's see... how do we begin. which camp are you in? copenhagen or many-world interpretation?wats the many world one? copenhagen is to math-y.
copenhagen: things don't occupy a single, definite state until they're observed.
many-world: all possibilities in the probabilities happen in different branches or reality.
Oh so many world states that thing about every possibilities in diff dimensions? an copenhagen is things will be what we observed them to be?
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Fallan wrote...
Oh so many world states that thing about every possibilities in diff dimensions? an copenhagen is things will be what we observed them to be?yes... kinda. many-world brings with it tons of extra worlds for the slightest differences in outcome, and copenhagen kinda says consciousness somewhat affects the state of something...
0
Fallan
Kamen Rider Cheeki
mibuchiha wrote...
Fallan wrote...
Oh so many world states that thing about every possibilities in diff dimensions? an copenhagen is things will be what we observed them to be?yes... kinda. many-world brings with it tons of extra worlds for the slightest differences in outcome, and copenhagen kinda says consciousness somewhat affects the state of something...
Many world interpretation is kinda lazy... somewhere someplace it'll happen?
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Fallan wrote...
mibuchiha wrote...
Fallan wrote...
Oh so many world states that thing about every possibilities in diff dimensions? an copenhagen is things will be what we observed them to be?yes... kinda. many-world brings with it tons of extra worlds for the slightest differences in outcome, and copenhagen kinda says consciousness somewhat affects the state of something...
Many world interpretation is kinda lazy... somewhere someplace it'll happen?
more like it must happen.
