FAKKU War Thread
0
Mangaexpert wrote...
MS-09RickDom wrote...
Mangaexpert wrote...
What makes you think that my anti-aircraft weapons can be that easily damaged?My fighter planes will destroy your SEAD aircraft
Too bad kid, SEAD missions + EWA will make your communication lines go "blind", so there's no way that you can retaliate against my attacks, read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mole_Cricket_19
Don't just base on the weapons used in this Operation, It's not just like rock-paper-scissors kid, it's all about tactics and strategies.
A couple of serious problems, however
First, my radar is not easily taken
Second, I'm not going to sit by and watch as your planes get a fix on where my SAMs are, I'll shoot them down, rendering you unable to get any clear fix on the location of my SAMS. And you don't know where me SAMs are originally
Third
You need vastly superior technology, which for the purposes of this war thread, we are assuming that our resources are all equal
Meaning that the radar interception and the transmission wouldn't have been quite so easy
And technology is different
Real-time voice command doesn't necesarily dictate unbreakable nor uninterceptable
Do you think I just rely on aerial reconnaissance? Hell no. EWA aircraft will shut down all of your communication lines and any SAM systems on an area + the tracking systems your SAMs and SPAA systems. We also got spy satellites circling the earth's orbit, don't you forget that. As I told you before, this is not like a rock-paper-scissor game.
Strike sequence
1. EWA sorties render all enemy communication lines useless.
2. SEAD aircraft destroys all SAMs, SPAAs, RIs etc.. rendering your ADW and BDC useless.
3. Any retaliatory strikes coming from the air will be intercepted by my fighters, thus if your com. lines are broken, all your pilots won't be able to coordinate and to launch a counteroffensive against my units.
So the conclusion is,Even if the enemy's got superior technology, a good strategist can turn the tide of a battle by using all his available units and troops efficiently and wisely.
Examples:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mole_Cricket_19
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ia_Drang
Numerical superiority and technological advantage won't assure you of a victory, It's in the combat doctrines, maneuvers and efficiency of the units that a Tactician uses.
0
Hey, like I said
Consider technology equal
If you've got spy sattelites
So do I
Whats EWA?
And my my SAMs will bring down your SEADs
Because you won't be able to translocate my radar to fool my SAMs
And what does the battle of la Drang have to do with your points
Consider technology equal
If you've got spy sattelites
So do I
Whats EWA?
And my my SAMs will bring down your SEADs
Because you won't be able to translocate my radar to fool my SAMs
And what does the battle of la Drang have to do with your points
1
It's the commissar!
~launches an airshow.
@Mangaexpert
So if our technological capabilities are equal, you still got no chance to launch a counteroffensive because all your Communication Lines are compromised, Don't you get that? Don't just base your answers at the net, read books sport.
Spoiler:
~launches an airshow.
Spoiler:
@Mangaexpert
So if our technological capabilities are equal, you still got no chance to launch a counteroffensive because all your Communication Lines are compromised, Don't you get that? Don't just base your answers at the net, read books sport.
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEAD
^This^
In U.S. service in Vietnam, SEAD missions were carried out by dedicated variants of tactical fighters such as the F-105G Thunderchief and F-4G Phantom II. These aircraft were nicknamed "Wild Weasels", and often used themselves as bait for enemy defenses. On the other hand, the Soviets preferred to use modified stand-off interceptors such as the Mikoyan MiG-25BM and missile-armed bombers such as the Tupolev Tu-22M to destroy targets from a distance rather than up-close.
Currently the main United States Air Force (USAF) SEAD aircraft is the F-16 Fighting Falcon, a multirole aircraft configurable for a variety of ground strike missions including SEAD. The Air Force and Navy's emphasis on multirole strike aircraft has largely made specified SEAD variants obsolete; virtually any aircraft in the U.S. arsenal designed to carry air-to-ground ordinance can, if needed, be configured for SEAD. The F/A-18 Super Hornet navy multirole fighter, F-15E Strike Eagle deep strike fighter, AV-8B Harrier marine strike fighter and A-10 Thunderbolt II Close Air Support aircraft are common secondary choices for SEAD missions depending on availability and mission requirements.
In European NATO air forces, the SEAD mission falls mostly to Royal Air Force Tornado GR.4s, Luftwaffe Tornado Electronic Combat and Reconnaissance variant (ECR), and Aeronautica Militare (AMI) Tornado ECRs. The RAF Tornados rely on the aforementioned ALARM missile and the Italian/German Tornado ECRs employ the AGM-88 HARM missile. The Tornado ECR was designed from the outset as a SEAD platform and is unique in the European NATO air order of battle. Although several European NATO aircraft can carry SEAD weapons, few were designed for, or are specifically tasked with, the dangerous SEAD mission.
^This^
In U.S. service in Vietnam, SEAD missions were carried out by dedicated variants of tactical fighters such as the F-105G Thunderchief and F-4G Phantom II. These aircraft were nicknamed "Wild Weasels", and often used themselves as bait for enemy defenses. On the other hand, the Soviets preferred to use modified stand-off interceptors such as the Mikoyan MiG-25BM and missile-armed bombers such as the Tupolev Tu-22M to destroy targets from a distance rather than up-close.
Currently the main United States Air Force (USAF) SEAD aircraft is the F-16 Fighting Falcon, a multirole aircraft configurable for a variety of ground strike missions including SEAD. The Air Force and Navy's emphasis on multirole strike aircraft has largely made specified SEAD variants obsolete; virtually any aircraft in the U.S. arsenal designed to carry air-to-ground ordinance can, if needed, be configured for SEAD. The F/A-18 Super Hornet navy multirole fighter, F-15E Strike Eagle deep strike fighter, AV-8B Harrier marine strike fighter and A-10 Thunderbolt II Close Air Support aircraft are common secondary choices for SEAD missions depending on availability and mission requirements.
In European NATO air forces, the SEAD mission falls mostly to Royal Air Force Tornado GR.4s, Luftwaffe Tornado Electronic Combat and Reconnaissance variant (ECR), and Aeronautica Militare (AMI) Tornado ECRs. The RAF Tornados rely on the aforementioned ALARM missile and the Italian/German Tornado ECRs employ the AGM-88 HARM missile. The Tornado ECR was designed from the outset as a SEAD platform and is unique in the European NATO air order of battle. Although several European NATO aircraft can carry SEAD weapons, few were designed for, or are specifically tasked with, the dangerous SEAD mission.
0
Mangaexpert wrote...
Still dont know what an EWA isElectronic Warfare Aircraft.
Wiki-chan doesn't have a page for this article yet, I just read it from my tomes of combat strategies.
@Rena-san
We are the German Africa Korps
The Führer's daring troops
We attack like the Devil
Make things hot for the Tommys
We fear neither heat nor desert sand
We brave the thirst and the blazing sun
Marching to the beat of our drum
The Führer's daring troops
We attack like the Devil
Make things hot for the Tommys
We fear neither heat nor desert sand
We brave the thirst and the blazing sun
Marching to the beat of our drum
