[Locked] Heroic Accomplishment: Harmonian

i'm going to do my best to keep you around -5, you wont be noteworthy either way.

I have said my share, and as far as I can see the subsequent reactions only warrant a filing under the keywords "Fakku" and "retarded".

the hate is strong in this one.

lol some people are more dense than I thought.

But wouldn't that also make you retarded since you're a part of FAKKU? =/

I'm curious as to how many people you could label as more dense than yourself.



"Fakku" and "retarded" are keywords. They are not a conjunction thereof, and can be used separately, with other keywords, or not at all. A valid question from someone who couldn't figure out the logic themselves.

fixed

answer: zero

Guily Guardian is calling me dense? Hahaha, oh my.

Although, you do realize that the effectiveness of your statement is diminished when you throw out accusations without being fully lucid of the situation at hand?

You're right. Was the way you worded that supposed to make me think less of myself or do you always sound like a pretentious bitch?

Uh oh.

It's like saying "broken" and "plate". You would file a broken plate under those two terms, but you're not saying that all plates are broken. It's quite simple, but then so are you.

I understood what she said, so what does that have to do with what I had replied?

I'm sorry, but is she just doing that to troll everybody all the time or does she honestly think she's better than everyone?

Integral part.

Just that when you're making accusations of who's a bitch, you're pointing your finger in the wrong direction.

Just because someone is a bitch, doesn't mean the other person isn't. I could point one finger in my direction, and one in hers. What's your point?

I read this thread

Here is a summary

"Hurfa durfa durfa
Drama
Drama
Logical arguments
Hurfa durf durf"

Forward all complaints to hibia@hibia.net

I feel like I've been over this a lot. However no, I would hardly consider myself pretentious. That would mean that I display pretenses or assumptions, neither of which I do.

Also, you slighted me first, I felt it only fair to return the favor. Tit for tat, etc.



Back to you, good friend! :)

OK, let me piece this together. You're both bitches and I wastefully re-explained what someone had already said? I'll settle for that score.

Are you honestly telling me that you don't?

Am I wrong? Do you not come off as someone who is under the impression that she is better than the vast majority of the forum?

If I'm wrong I do apologize, but I believe (as do many others) that she does think so, which only makes my point more valid.

Edit: I expected that you would, but I've been watching you do it to others for a while and I think it's unnecessary.

No, I think she's proven time and again that she is indeed better than the vast majority of the forum. Much like myself.