MATH. FUCKING SHIT. NEED HELP.
0
DOUJIN RATING SYSTEM
(5a+2b+2c+d)=x
x((y+1)(1-0^x))^y*2^z
x((y+1)(1-0^x))^y*2^z
THE LETTER ARE FETISHES
IF PRESENT THEN THE LETTER=1
OTHERWISE 0
X=ALL FAVORITE FETISHES/SOME RATED HIGHER THAN OTHERS, HENCE 5A VS 2B
Y IS A NECCESITY, WITHOUT IT THE DOUJIN IS PRETTY MUCH WORTHLESS BUT
OTHERWISE IT ISN'T WORTH ANYTHING ON IT'S OWN
Z IS ONE FETISH THAT IS WORTHLESS UNLESS THE OTHERS ARE PRESENT, THE WHOLE FORMULA
IS WORTHLESS UNLESS Y IS PRESENT AND A, B, C, D ARE THE MAIN FETISHES
THE /2^Y IN THE END MAKES IT SO THE MATERIAL ISN'T COMPLETELY WORTHLESS
IF Y ISN'T PRESENT AND BALANCES IT OUT WORTH A MAXIMUM 100% SCORE
INTERESTING THING IS IT(RATING) CAN'T GO ABOVE 100%
100 POINTS IS A THEORETICALLY IDEAL DOUJIN
NOT POSSIBLE
THE REASON 100 IS THEORETICAL IS BECAUSE THE FORMULA EXCLUDES WHAT A PERSON DOESN'T LIKE
HAVE TO CREATE ANOTHER FORMULA FOR THOSE AND SUBTRACT IT FROM THE SCORE
[size=1]BTW, this ain't my formula. This is a friend of mine's formula.[/h]
0
Noutakun wrote...
Who the fuck is responsible for thisGuess you didn't read the fine print.
HALP! I'M MATH ILLITERATE!
I KNOW SOMETHING'S WRONG WITH THIS FORMULA BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT.
0
animefreak_usa wrote...
I canz barely read my son.Sounds like you high. Do you still ask why is it Tuesday?
0
Noutakun wrote...
Your fine print does not answer my question: who the FUCK is responsible for this travesty?Why the fuck is it a travesty?
0
For starters, how does one create a rating system for a medium of entertainment that is subject to niche interests and fetishes? On top of that, who gets to decide which fetishes are more important/worth more points than others? It sounds overly complicated where a simple scale of 1-10 rating system where you can sort by tags would be much more appropriate.
0
Noutakun wrote...
For starters, how does one create a rating system for a medium of entertainment that is subject to niche interests and fetishes? On top of that, who gets to decide which fetishes are more important/worth more points than others? It sounds overly complicated where a simple scale of 1-10 rating system where you can sort by tags would be much more appropriate.He told me was bored during an IT lecture.
Extreme boredom that led to do THIS.
0
The formula doesn't work because it isn't absolute- which is kinda the entire point of math.
To get anywhere even close, he would need to expand it to account for all the variables, in which case- I very much doubt that anyone would have the patience to do all the number-crunching involved.
To get anywhere even close, he would need to expand it to account for all the variables, in which case- I very much doubt that anyone would have the patience to do all the number-crunching involved.
