[#9] Perverted Poll - Are you circumcised?

Must be sarcasm.

The gliding action during intercourse is said to help women achieve clitoral orgasm faster.

now im not cirumcised but i must disagree with your 'moto' (its there for a reason people dont cut it off)...y'know genital warts? there there for a reason..but im pretty sure you want to cut/burn/freeze them off, a uni-brow..thats there for a reason..but im pretty sure you wanna cut/shave it off...even if something has a reason..dosent stop it from being cut my friend

lets just say im not jewish
:lol:

You don't have to be Jewish to be circumcised.

Allow me to add a few words of reason to the bit about uncircumcised penises getting diseases. The practice was really started, like many things in religious codes and texts, as not some sort of divine law but as a guideline for proper health and hygiene in what was, to be honest, a very disgusting and filthy world back then. People didn't bathe regularly in those times, and when they did the water was probably less than clean.

So it's kind of like kosher, in that the main reason nobody wanted to eat pig back then was because filthy living conditions allowed parasitic diseases like trichinosis to run wild in pigs. So really, it's something you don't actually have to do anymore if you live in a somewhat modernized place, but people still do it because it's been worked into their religious practices somehow.

In other words, if you take a shower every day, it's not like you'll ever have any problems with your dickskin.

And to be honest, if "stuff" gets "stuck" there, you NOTICE.

For what it's worth, I've had boyfriends who've been circumcised and others who were uncircumcised, and I really couldn't care less about the difference. From the girls I've talked to about the issue, that seems to be the general consensus. Cut or not, it's still a penis.

But then, most of the girls I know are perverts like me, so take it with a grain of salt.

- What the Crap?! It's for medical reasons now that most people do it, not because they're Jews.
I was circumsized when I was a baby and I'll probably get my sons circumsized as well.



- Agreed~!

Cutting veins and reducing the blood supply the crap.

I am uncut. I dunno about all the research and studies and whatnot, but I, personally, have never had any problems from being uncircumcised, so I don't really see a need for it. It's just a little piece of skin, so like most of us would agree, don't be a right dirty bastard, wash yourself, and it's all good.

It looks like this is going to turn into nothing but a Monkey-Shitfight so everyone should go and read *THIS* and make up their own minds. Some of the linked articles are also worth the read.

lol @ what this topic turned into

I did it back when I was 14 and good lord in heaven i thought i put myself in hell. The reason i got circumcised was cause the foreskin wouldn't pull back and the doc's steroids weren't working either. So instead of stretching it I was just oh to hell with it cut it up. And You guys have no idea what it's like waking up from an operation and going to the bathroom with a bloody bandage over ur cock head. The next day I had to take off the bandage which was one of the most painful things ive ever done. It put me border line passing out/dizziness. And then looking at the thing in stitched ugh. Just remember if you ever have a son do him a favor and either do it when he's born or when he's moved out of your house. Cause i would have rather kept my virginity for another year than have that done to me. And what sucks is that i missed the first two weeks of freshman high school so every time a cock-joke came up I'd always be put in it.

You better be fucking kidding

and if not Nikon ban his under age ass

Unfortunately yes, and I'm not bothered that I'm circumsized for any reason other than the fact that my parents thought they had the right to permenently remove a significant portion of my dick.

Frankly, that decision should have been up to me and not my parents and I think I should be able to sue for damages, seeing as the process is irreversible.

Just to put another voice in here. From what I know Lurking is right, it is the norm in the U.S. as far as I know. Most hospitals do it right at birth.

I'm circumsized

like appendix, that skin is also functionless and no harm of its being remove except the harm of the surgical operation itself that if its done by inexperience surgeon or done by non-authorized clinic may it be harmful
while appendix is only thrown if it became nearly burst appendix or electively done in case of frequent appendicitis to prevent future appendicitis which could be more severe and more complication.
The genital circumsicion done to minimize starting source of infection such as in urinary tract infection which can ascend silently into kidney without any symptoms. In this case, to prevent infection disease to affect vital organ kidney. prevention is better than cure, isnt it?
Its not always about std. It can be of fungal infection like candidiasis. Male probably hygiene and fungal free but their female partner could be having it even with good hygiene that can occur in female


saying the skin help in sex better than in circumsized is totally not true. its like wearing a condom. male glide the skin lose the feel of glide in vagina, its warmth and so on, imagine it yourself. female will feel less gliding especially in limb skin that probably attach to vagina skin with only the male feel the glide under their skin. Also in my own opinion, getting the skin removed let the the genital have its freedom to get bigger than its skin sac and further feel you partner.