[Locked] FIGHT FOR YOU FREEDOM!
0
Which bills or laws are you implying? And again, your doing nothing but speculating, and in that matter, without common sense. ugh here is a list why this will never happen
1. Doing such or passing something would require censoring that restricts upon the constitution
2.Private entities are not within jurisdiction of only US, and break no law currently to cause action
3.There is no problem currently in status quo, your point is invalid.
4.Massive outrage would occur not only from the search companies and providers,but the masses if the US were to enact a golden shield like program.
5.The problem your presenting is that google and other search engines are restricting your freedom by censoring certain sites with malicious or illegal words,which they are not but your evidence and statements say that governments(particularly only ONE ACTOR for this matter,the US) will ban it, you yourself are not topical.
6.Your addon does nothing but provide one facet of "freedom", you do not solve, and have no advantages to go with your plan.
7.Coming from a source that cannot structure a definite argument, your plan is ambigious and extremely vague, and as such is fundamentall incoherent
1. Doing such or passing something would require censoring that restricts upon the constitution
2.Private entities are not within jurisdiction of only US, and break no law currently to cause action
3.There is no problem currently in status quo, your point is invalid.
4.Massive outrage would occur not only from the search companies and providers,but the masses if the US were to enact a golden shield like program.
5.The problem your presenting is that google and other search engines are restricting your freedom by censoring certain sites with malicious or illegal words,which they are not but your evidence and statements say that governments(particularly only ONE ACTOR for this matter,the US) will ban it, you yourself are not topical.
6.Your addon does nothing but provide one facet of "freedom", you do not solve, and have no advantages to go with your plan.
7.Coming from a source that cannot structure a definite argument, your plan is ambigious and extremely vague, and as such is fundamentall incoherent
0
Tegumi wrote...
I think I'd care a lot more about this issue if it wasn't being presented by a parrot screeching at the top of its lungs.Grrrr. ill admit that. im sure people will copy this being trolling fucks(and most of them probably do troll cuz they get shafted IRL. so Ill calm down! so that way people can see what a big problem this is. Any website that specializes in downloads, illegal or not fall right smack in the center of the scope of laws that the link applies to. Just imagine if Fakku had just a few copyright problems the whole place under the laws that are coming could be kept from showing up on searches and froze completely. thats really concerning isn't it!
0
Darkhilt wrote...
Which bills or laws are you implying? And again, your doing nothing but speculating, and in that matter, without common sense. ugh here is a list why this will never happen 1. Doing such or passing something would require censoring restricts upon the constitution
2.Private entities are not within jurisdiction of only US, and break no law currently to cause action
3.There is no problem currently in status quo, your point is invalid.
4.Massive outrage would occur not only from the search companies and providers,but the masses if the US were to enact a golden shield like program.
5.The problem your presenting is that google and other search engines are restricting your freedom by censoring certain sites with malicious or illegal words,which they are not but your evidence and statements say that governments(particularly only ONE ACTOR for this matter,the US) will ban it, you yourself are not topical.
6.Your addon does nothing but provide one facet of "freedom", you do not solve, and have no advantages to go with your plan.
7.Coming from a source that cannot structure a definite argument, your plan is ambigious and extremely vague, and as such is fundamentall incoherent
Waow. Presented in good format and logic. If only I were in the mindset to do that. Either gj~
0
Sprite wrote...
Waow. Presented in good format and logic. If only I were in the mindset to do that. Either gj~
0
Addition: Autocomplete and Instant search is shit. Just press the enter button like any other internet user savvy enough to torrent and download and there will be no problem. Google instant search already blocks most porn sites. The only reason why Fakku and most other hentai sites are still on the list is because the don't have blatantly obvious porn names.
EDIT: OP in this thread reminds me of this except not nearly as funny.
EDIT: OP in this thread reminds me of this except not nearly as funny.
0
eliminating that from autocomplete is a-ok with me. They should eliminate things like "lactating asian milf feeding midgets" from autocomplete too. Let people find their own porn and torrents. I don't want people to be lazy and find it for them.
0
AvatarEnd wrote...
eliminating that from autocomplete is a-ok with me. They should eliminate things like "lactating asian milf feeding midgets" from autocomplete too. Let people find their own porn and torrents. I don't want people to be lazy and find it for them.Just wondering XD, how did autocomplete give you that, :3 what exactly were you searching for?
0
Gee and yet that dumb kid's topic has a hit count of 1400! someones looking! just like this one nearly has a 100 in a few minutes hmmm! kinda funny huh???
Aye mate. I could post a topic with a dog and have the topic title be "USELESS INFORMATION! PLEASE DON'T CLICK" and I can guarantee you that people will click it as soon as they see it. Its the most basic of psychology.
0
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/02/proposals-to-target-online-piracy-trigger-alarm-from-tech-industry/
read partially down the page.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/190781-tech-groups-say-online-piracy-bill-would-create-nightmare-for-web-and-social-media-firms
read the first few paragraphs.
some may be saying "ohh its to general or that will never happen" Really?? considering that throughout history government has been one set in studies of the extreme i think not. such plnas as SOPA, ACTA, and a few others are extremely concerning.
read partially down the page.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/190781-tech-groups-say-online-piracy-bill-would-create-nightmare-for-web-and-social-media-firms
read the first few paragraphs.
some may be saying "ohh its to general or that will never happen" Really?? considering that throughout history government has been one set in studies of the extreme i think not. such plnas as SOPA, ACTA, and a few others are extremely concerning.
0
"Under current law, websites can be ordered to take down particular content that infringes on a copyright"
No shit. "these bills would give the Justice Department the power to compel payment providers, ad services, search engines and service providers to cut ties with offending sites, while going after the operators themselves." First of all,this says to compel or in other words,suggest, there is no way for them to command a private entity to do such without first amending that we should not have unalienable rights, which they won't do. Also, your evidence says that current law can influence other laws that suggest that ads and search engines restrict themselves from other websites in an attempt to lower access to them as they contain illegal materials, which fakku hasn't a bit of,besides, when was the last time a law stopped people from commiting illicit acts or downloads, A pirate is always free, and will find ways with sheer ingenuity. Your now going really far from topic now, your calling the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Act extremely concerning and extreme? Meh it doesn't in one sense remove your rights of privacy and speech, it just rightfully adds more pressure to piracy, which really is a dispicable act unless used because of inability to reach resources wherein it is justified.
To summarize:
Your plan does not solve. The addon does not solve the problem you say you stand against or the plan you actually infer to
Your plan is not topical. The point of your plan is to free us from censorship which is currently not enforced, while you advocate that anti-piracy legislation will occur and as such will PREVENT ILLEGAL ACTS. Meh, do I even have to go foward? Your saying that the government doing its job to prevent crime is bad.
Your plan has no impact. Currently pirates easily reach their pirated goods without to much problem for such an act, and your plan does not provide adequate assistance to do such and as such provides no competition
Your plan is harmful and incoherent. Your plan suggests that we use illicit methods to receive information that is available normally while you present information thats says illicit methods are bad
Oh and I'm providing a counterplan: We don't use search engines your addon apparently helps to divert us from simply pressing enter which generally takes 0.14 seconds and spread through various medias the ways to receive illicit downloads.
No shit. "these bills would give the Justice Department the power to compel payment providers, ad services, search engines and service providers to cut ties with offending sites, while going after the operators themselves." First of all,this says to compel or in other words,suggest, there is no way for them to command a private entity to do such without first amending that we should not have unalienable rights, which they won't do. Also, your evidence says that current law can influence other laws that suggest that ads and search engines restrict themselves from other websites in an attempt to lower access to them as they contain illegal materials, which fakku hasn't a bit of,besides, when was the last time a law stopped people from commiting illicit acts or downloads, A pirate is always free, and will find ways with sheer ingenuity. Your now going really far from topic now, your calling the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Act extremely concerning and extreme? Meh it doesn't in one sense remove your rights of privacy and speech, it just rightfully adds more pressure to piracy, which really is a dispicable act unless used because of inability to reach resources wherein it is justified.
To summarize:
Your plan does not solve. The addon does not solve the problem you say you stand against or the plan you actually infer to
Your plan is not topical. The point of your plan is to free us from censorship which is currently not enforced, while you advocate that anti-piracy legislation will occur and as such will PREVENT ILLEGAL ACTS. Meh, do I even have to go foward? Your saying that the government doing its job to prevent crime is bad.
Your plan has no impact. Currently pirates easily reach their pirated goods without to much problem for such an act, and your plan does not provide adequate assistance to do such and as such provides no competition
Your plan is harmful and incoherent. Your plan suggests that we use illicit methods to receive information that is available normally while you present information thats says illicit methods are bad
Oh and I'm providing a counterplan: We don't use search engines your addon apparently helps to divert us from simply pressing enter which generally takes 0.14 seconds and spread through various medias the ways to receive illicit downloads.
0
Darkhilt wrote...
"Under current law, websites can be ordered to take down particular content that infringes on a copyright"No shit. "these bills would give the Justice Department the power to compel payment providers, ad services, search engines and service providers to cut ties with offending sites, while going after the operators themselves." First of all,this says to compel or in other words,suggest, there is no way for them to command a private entity to do such without first amending that we should not have unalienable rights, which they won't do. Also, your evidence says that current law can influence other laws that suggest that ads and search engines restrict themselves from other websites in an attempt to lower access to them as they contain illegal materials, which fakku hasn't a bit of,besides, when was the last time a law stopped people from commiting illicit acts or downloads, A pirate is always free, and will find ways with sheer ingenuity. Your now going really far from topic now, your calling the Anti-Piracy Trade Act extremely concerning and extreme? Meh it doesn't in one sense remove your rights of privacy and speech, it just rightfully adds more pressure to piracy, which really is a dispicable act unless used because of inability to reach resources wherein it is justified.
To summarize:
Your plan does not solve. The addon does not solve the problem you say you stand against or the plan you actually infer to
Your plan is not topical. The point of your plan is to free us from censorship which is currently not enforced, while you advocate that anti-piracy legislation will occur and as such will PREVENT ILLEGAL ACTS. Meh, do I even have to go foward? Your saying that the government doing its job to prevent crime is bad.
Your plan has no impact. Currently pirates easily reach their pirated goods without to much problem for such an act, and your plan does not provide adequate assistance to do such and as such provides no competition
Your plan is harmful and incoherent. Your plan suggests that we use illicit methods to receive information that is available normally while you present information thats says illicit methods are bad
Oh and I'm providing a counterplan: We don't use search engines your addon apparently helps to divert us from simply pressing enter which generally takes 0.14 seconds and spread through various medias the ways to receive illicit downloads.
thats the way its always started. good intentions. the path to hell is paved with them. good intentions fall short in the face of profit, self, and greed. i may advocate illegality but how long before what was once a free act and God given right turn into a crime...not long. not long at all....
0
Meh oh so now stealing from someone so that you can sell it off to other people is now a "free, God given right?". Do not bring God into this or your no better than an extremist. Piracy is always and always will be a crime, given thats why its called "piracy". Of course good intentions fall short, which is the reason why these laws and actions will be passed, because people like you only care for profit, wherein its only passing it to others for recognition and ability to torrent from others, self, as you don't see how piracy can cause various repercussions within the economy and problems on the domestic level, and greed, you don't wish to spend money on something someone made in the mind to sell and get a living off of, the world isn't built off of good intentions purely, and your point states that, so again your a hypocrite XD
