GIANTS

hahah thats a very painful way to commit suicide.

I don't think anyone with a right mind (man or women) will enjoy that

I've seen women insert that large things before but, while it entertains you it also horrifies you to realize that the vagina can take that kind of punishment. Though it makes me wonder..after they do that is there any tread left on the tire or is it like throwing a hot dog down a hallway

you heard that on family guy didn't you

Yeah, my friends and I have seen waaaaay too much family guy. We can quote entire scenes.

bestiality seems pretty popular nowadays, but what a way to go... kind of ironic that he was ready to get a horse cock in the ass but not a metaphoric cock of humiliation. he wasnt alone for sure though, its been done before and itll be done again... hopefully without casualties. ive heard a couple of crazy 'way to go' stories, for instance! a daughter masturbating with a broom stick impaled herself when her parents started entering the home and she acted a little to absent mindedly... jumping off the table she was on. theres a billion ways to go people, but choking on food sounds glamorous compared to these. hope they rest in peace regardless.

The only story I have that compares to that one is a story I heard of a girl masturbating with a frozen hot dog and getting it frozen to herself. Still the broom is leagues above in the "WTF" category

lolz, people will give anything a try these days, no offense but Canada LEGALIZED gay and lez marriages, i wonder what they'll come up with next, "ok now u're legalized to get married with ur dog and get fucked by it on the streets, isn't that fun?!"

ah(long sigh) what's wrong with people these days.

it's not like that i OPPOSES(such a strong word) it, just that i think it's not natural for that to happen, God created men and women to be together, how is a man gonna have a baby with another man(except for adoption), if they can't, how can they carry out the responsibilities of parents or even wife and husband(in that case, 2 husbands).

as i said, it's not like, i'm very strict about it, but i just don't think it's right

lol and the very worst part of that is that someone, somewhere, gets off on women impaled on brooms.

As much as I've weighed in on this subject when I've come across discussions, I haven't actually come to the logical answer until now. First of all, marriage itself is not about reproducing. People are always talking about how gay marriage is wrong because two dicks or two pussies don't make a kid. And if there is some kind of unspoken law about reproduction and marriage, how does it apply to surrogates? Some people's bodies aren't capable of reproduction. Logically, when saying that homosexuals shouldn't get married because they can't reproduce, its the same as saying someone who has some kind of physiological problem such as infertility can't get married either.

God didn't create shit and has nothing to do with this, no offense to people who believe otherwise. If it did have an opinion don't you think this would have been resolved, lets say, thousands of years ago. I've seen a lot of "street prophets" in my life and heard a lot of things out of them, but never have I heard one say, "God thinks homosexuality is wrong."

As for the whole, "how can a homosexual couple carry out the responsibilities of parents" issue, I know a lot of people who had gay parents that were raised completely fine. Most of them are even more functional in society and mentally stable than people who have straight parents. What about single parents for that matter? I have a dad, but I don't consider him as such, because he was never around. Fuck, I didn't even know he existed until I was at least 4 or 5.

Homosexuality has no bearing on a person's parenting capability. If I didn't actually hear it coming out of people's mouths, I wouldn't even believe that a person would think something like that. Its completely baseless and extremely prejudiced against homosexuals.

Oh shit, I did it again. I really need to work on controlling my ranting.

well, if u go into the subject in such a umm.. in-depth angle, u're right about all of it, that i cannot argue, but..

what i'm saying is majorly focused on the moral view of things(basically just common sense), i mean, there's nothing wrong with a man loving another(even sexually), it's all just personal preferences, there are just way more straight people in the world than those who are homo. which creates a sort of social ethics for the most of us.

and i definitely didn't mean what u think i meant on the parental responsibility part, i didn't refer to anything as "he's gay, he probably doesn't how carry out the responsibility as a father" what i meant was, if u have no children, naturally one wouldn't know how to carry out the responsibilities as a parent, that's one of things we gradually learn from the generation that raises us and therefore pass it on.(simple misunderstanding, don't get offended or mad, i just wanna know what ur opinion was, and it was helpful, so please forgive my careless selection of words that might have cause some misunderstandings)

No problem. Its true that, there are a lot more straight people than homosexuals, but being able to get some kind of measurement of the prevalence regarding any type of sexual orientation is really difficult. I'm not saying that the assumption is wrong, statistically, by a wide margin, less homosexuals are a minority in human society. The idea that the disparity in numbers being a motivating factor behind ethical development is a common theory in social psychology and sociology.

When it comes to parenting in general, there are more influences on a person than their experiences with their own parents. There are things that you can learn or take from your childhood that shape how you would raise your own children, but things can change drastically between generations and what was once common practice might not be suitable. Its a combination of environmental, biological, emotional, personal, and interpersonal influences that really shape the way a parent interacts with and raises a child. I can't give specific details about what goes into parenting not just because it varies from one person to another, but because I don't have kids so I'm not all that of an expert on the subject.

More of them wind up with College degreess, are better professionaly, and have stabler relationships. Not only is it because Gays are on average smarter than the avergae Heterosexual, but they have much more stable home lives. Those in a gay marriage situation are more likeley to have both parents under one household. Not only that....but this trend is seen in the wild as well (AKA with animals)

Gays make better parents Striaghts according to the data. When not outlaw heterosexual marriage? Over half of those end in divorice...and from that we see that Children are more likley to drop out of highschool, get a criminal record, and get a girl pregeant while underage.


Not only that Reigioulsy in the USA ther eis no reason to ban gay marriage...according to the first admendment any way. The biggest Jewish sect now conducts marriage cermonies between two same sex partnears.

I want one of those.

but it naturally dilates over a period of time to allow for the kid. Using a dildo like that is like trying to punch your fist into your ass without loosening it up first. I wonder if those girls work themselves up to one that big..and afterwards can they really have sex..does the guy want to have sex after that..it'd be all stretched out..

@The Jesus: Are you my brother? You and I seem to be the debaters of these forums and from what I remember our opinions are similar except when it comes to cosmic ideas.

There are some videos of women either voluntarily putting things or having them forced into their pussy. I mean its scary sometimes. I'd imagine it would be pretty stretched out after having any large item in there, but there are methods to tighten it again.



I'm everyone's brother.

It be like throwing a hot doig in a hallway I guess :wink:

because love conquers all remember? everyone who gos into a marriage thinks that all conflicting problems can be resolved at one time or another and that in the end, the love between each other will conquer any possible road blocks along the way. you dont need statistics to know that isnt how it works, were just a little to ignorant to care.

i think what nate river was trying to imply 9 or 10 paragraphs ago was that should homosexuality become a prevelant choice thousands of years ago, the population and possibly the world as we know it would be completely different. marriage isnt implicated for reproduction, LIFE is. taking survival of the fittest and adaptation out of the picture, a species needs to reproduce to stay on the time line. i think he was just saying that if it ever becomes the majority preference we might have to worry more about population and maintaining it, but the jesus has a point; even if we were all gay, artificial insemination, sperm dononations, surrogate mothers... weve developed plenty of coup de' tat solutions against practical reproduction. even without a religious stand point though i thought nate stated a good point.

i respect the homosexuality community a ton, it took them a while to gain the rights they barely have today. seems we like to critisize anything thats a little rough around the edges nowadays... what else is new.