how long really?

I'd say that I last around 15-20 mins perhaps, maybe a few minutes longer if I concentrate on it, for my past gf's this has been enough too, so I guess it's all chill for me. My first time was short, not like I took time, but probably no longer than 5 mins. I have no idea for the longest, I have kept going for a while on occasion, but usually going on for a long time means reaching climax more than once. And as i'm also one of those who just falls asleep after climaxing so that rarely happens.

And yeah Jonoe, I think most guys do. It really sucks. ._.

I'm also quite interested in how long I'll last when getting back into the action, so to speak, since I have not been with a lady for more than a year now, and it has been a long time since I walked more than a month or so without sex.

Far as fapping goes.... Depends really. I can last anywhere from 15 minutes, to 2 hours. True story.

What? My piss comes from my urethra - above my vagina. I don't piss from my vaginal canal

No, you're not.
No you cannot.

Like most anything people on fakku spout when it comes to health, this is 100% proof bullshit.
UTI = colonization of the urinary tract by a foreign species, i.e. bacteria.
Your sperm = not a foreign species
Your sperm = does not cause an immunoreaction
Your sperm = cannot cause an infection in your own urethra.
Conclusion: It's perfectly safe to just fall asleep after sex.
Even if your sperm were to form a feeding bed for bacteria, it'd still be safe, because the next time you urinate (2-6 times a day in the average healthy adult) will be cleansed of any and all residue; and within this frame of time, significant colonization in the urethra is nigh impossible due to ridiculously high pH levels there.

You are quite right, and you sir, are no exception.




The pH level of urin is around 6, and so it is actually below the pH level of ~7 which is considered neutral (neither acidic or alkaline). This would also mean that bacteria could easily grow in that environment, if it was not for the fact that urine is sterile and the possibility of any bacteria then ending up in your urethra is next to none.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PH

I assume that your other "facts" have been researched just as "thorough". but disregarding this complete lack of researching your facts, then your conclusion is still valid: Sperm does not pose any threat, bacterial or otherwise, if you do not pee after sex.

The science of love~~

True, but the "truth" of wikipedia is an average of all the users contributing meaning there is very few errors. Putting that aside, then wikipedia actually just gave the information I needed more exact that other pages in case. If some other page I thought was reasonably authoritative had presented my point better I would have chosen that.
But all that is besides the point, since the wiki articles only support the claim of urine pH value, and urine being sterile, two claims that hardly needs a source...

http://www.bioconlabs.com/nitribactfacts.html

Basically, Growth is inhibited at 6~6.5.

http://www.ehow.com/how_2340512_bodys-ph-level-better-health.html

You're body's pH level can rise up to 7.5, if not higher.

http://www.anytestkits.com/utk-ph-of-urine.htm

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_pH_level_of_urine

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/14622533/The-Ph-Level-Of-Urine

Ideal Lv., and what it should normally be, is 7ish.

http://science.jrank.org/pages/714/Bacteria.html

However, it also depends on the type of bacteria.


Wiki for the loss. Get your facts straight, and stop with the failwiki.

Growth of some bacteria...




The body's pH does not equal the urine pH, though there is a correspondence of cause.




- First link is a user contribution site... and it say that the pH value is normally 6-6.9
- Second link only states that the optimal pH value are in the range 7-7.4
- does not state what normal urine pH values are, only what abnormal values can indicate, plus it has a vested economical intereste and does not seem trustworthy in its amateur design.





I know that common bacteria grow around the pH values of nutral, but I also already knew that many can grow very easily outside this range too, which is all the link say.




so to sum up:
- my facts are correct
- many of the links you use are also user contribution sites, and some does just not have credibility (something wikipedia actually does have to a degree)
- unlike your sources, wikipedia does actually require sources to consider an article "complete", which means that you do not have to take the authors word for the claims in the wiki article.
- I have had more than one (university level) course in source criticism, and I believe I can jugde quite well when a source is appropriate and not. If this had been an article for a conference I would not have used wikipedia, but for fakku the wiki sources I gave was more than good enough with 20+ cited sources you can look at your self if you do not believe the claims in the wiki articles.

- [size=28]YOU FAIL[/h] in so many different ways at making your point right that it is actually sad.

*Shrug* OK, I give. You're right. I'm not really in the mood to argue the point further either way. My attempt to make a point loses. I still think Wiki is fail though, that doesn't change. I would think it better to provide better sources of information, but what's done is done.

Its been so long since ive actually had sex, ive forgotten -_-`.
But my first time was like maybe 10 minutes.

Did I ever say anything about the pH level of urine?
I did not.

Where I did make a mistake was the "ridiculously high", which is obviously wrong, as it should have just been "ridiculous", a mistake deservedly pointed out.

What I did say is that the pH level in the urethra is hostile to foreign colonization (which reaches a high of 6.5 and a low of 4.5 throughout the day in healthy adults to be exact, see [3], depending on the amounts of residual C₅H₄N₄O₃ and C₂H₄O₂ present in the urethra), thereby retarding infection, as both bacteria and fungal infectants (candida albicans) relevant to UTI are highly susceptible to even minute reductions in pH levels ("specialists"), as has been amply demonstrated by research since the 1960s, such as in [4]10.1111/j.1439-0507.1970.tb01159.x, wherein was shown that even prostatic fluid with its pH of 6.5 effectively inhibits mycosis in the urethral tract, thus demonstrating the effect of minor divergences in pH having sweeping effects.
Male urethral pH is thereby not as extreme as female vaginal pH (3.8 - 4.5), but well serious enough to retard colonization.
The male urethra and female vagina's acidic environment is the very reason for sperm being alkaline, because otherwise the sperm would not survive long enough to ensure fertilization.

Your suggestion I do research is ridiculous, seeing how your "research" consists of quoting wikipedia, of all things.
I relied on [1]Lawrence, Sorenson & al. (2009) (eds.) A General Textbook of Andrology and Urology, IX, "UTI, Aetiology of" or [2]Salam (2003) Principles and Practice of Urology, I, "Genitourinary Infection" and last but not least [3]Association Française des Urologues en Formation (2007)(eds.): Urologie..

Okay, this is getting to much of topic, so I will keep it (kind of) brief this time.
1. Urine would have an impact on the pH value, since it urethra's pH value would be shifted towards the urine every time you urinate. But that is even besides the point, my point was just the ridiculously high mistake.
2. I assume your facts about bacterial/fungal growth are correct, my comment about your research was general because you gave several claims with no support, and I caught you in your obvious mistake about the pH levels.
3. Regarding the wiki sources, then I have already argued in a post one or two above this, that they can be perfectly valid, especially for fakku.
4. regarding the "proper" sources, then I only have two options: books and scientific articles. the books would require me to go to the library, which just takes too much time for me. articles are hard to find as you need domain knowledge to know if the article is sound and relevant. As my interest in biology is hobby level at best, I do not have this domain knowledge.
5. Kudos on your very well supported argument and explanation :)

Returning to the original topic at hand, I found this quite remarkable:


Because I had the same problem early on in the relationship, too. Personally, I was just too nervous the first few times to really let go.
The following I add as a read for the willing; it is probably the best thing ever written on the issue on the internet (save for the part about his fantasy, which I myself wouldn't find hot at all ;p). A bit of a read, but so worth it:

depends on how fast I go but I just like getting off 3 minutes is all you need though. I can nut and get hard again so I dont really care about time. most women dont even get off on strait intercourse if you are just scoring it dont matter. if you are with your girlfriend try new stuff see what she likes cause once you find that nuff said that package is wrapped and the boat floats itself