White Knights
How do you feel about white knights?
0
PersonDude wrote...
Rovencrone wrote...
Silverc wrote...
LOL at waars failed prospective on white knights origin XD Chivalry as it is has always happened for the sake of a woman.
also, chilvalry even from before the medieval times, was focussed on loyalty and honor. respect for women was one of the codes, but only one.
I believe you missed the most important part of the nickname, White Knight. Knights originated from the Middle Ages and followed the code of Chivalry. So Silverc is quite correct on this issue.
Accept chivalry is a knight code. Courtly love, and in turn "respect" for women, is only part of the code. Honor is another part, as well as Christian knight virtues. Hypocritical some of them are I think, but that is aside from the point.
0
PersonDude wrote...
Rovencrone wrote...
Silverc wrote...
LOL at waars failed prospective on white knights origin XD Chivalry as it is has always happened for the sake of a woman.
also, chilvalry even from before the medieval times, was focussed on loyalty and honor. respect for women was one of the codes, but only one.
I believe you missed the most important part of the nickname, White Knight. Knights originated from the Middle Ages and followed the code of Chivalry compelling the Knights to uphold their value as a gentlemen. So Silverc is quite correct on this issue.
excuse me, when I changed that I thought he was referring to chivalry from before the medieval ages (when he referenced to troy) and I stated the Arab's view on Chivalry.
0
Tsurayu wrote...
PersonDude wrote...
Rovencrone wrote...
Silverc wrote...
LOL at waars failed prospective on white knights origin XD Chivalry as it is has always happened for the sake of a woman.
also, chilvalry even from before the medieval times, was focussed on loyalty and honor. respect for women was one of the codes, but only one.
I believe you missed the most important part of the nickname, White Knight. Knights originated from the Middle Ages and followed the code of Chivalry. So Silverc is quite correct on this issue.
Accept chivalry is a knight code. Courtly love, and in turn "respect" for women, is only part of the code. Honor is another part, as well as Christian knight virtues. Hypocritical some of them are I think, but that is aside from the point.
True but if you look at the True White Knights *if i remember correctly were a branch of the Templars* they were fanatical Christians
0
But still, what we are talking about here now supposedly are those who want womens attention sorta right?...
0
ashcrimson wrote...
But still, what we are talking about here now supposedly are those who want womens attention sorta right?...Eh who knows the threads are fun XD most of the time i don't even consider waars words as serious
0
ashcrimson wrote...
But still, what we are talking about here now supposedly are those who want womens attention sorta right?...I think that's what we were going for. Trying to be all noble in front of a girl in hopes she starts getting close to you so you can push her for some naughty fun. :P
0
My point there, was to just state that in chivalry, the codes for honor and loyalty far outnumbered those that had to do with respect for ladies
1
Tsurayu wrote...
ashcrimson wrote...
But still, what we are talking about here now supposedly are those who want womens attention sorta right?...I think that's what we were going for. Trying to be all noble in front of a girl in hopes she starts getting close to you so you can push her for some naughty fun. :P
true most chivalry was for that also courting women that you would never get to screw *but if you watch history of sex on history channel you find out that most knights had at least one mistress of nobility*
0
So Im not really a white knight then
Sometimes I do wonder, what if black knights and white knights are actually in cahoots with each other.. you know one pick on the girl and the other tries to defend her and its all just scripted
Sometimes I do wonder, what if black knights and white knights are actually in cahoots with each other.. you know one pick on the girl and the other tries to defend her and its all just scripted
0
What's code of chivalry got something to do with internet White Knights or in other words, Flirts??..........
0
Silverc wrote...
Tsurayu wrote...
ashcrimson wrote...
But still, what we are talking about here now supposedly are those who want womens attention sorta right?...I think that's what we were going for. Trying to be all noble in front of a girl in hopes she starts getting close to you so you can push her for some naughty fun. :P
true most chivalry was for that also courting women that you would never get to screw *but if you watch history of sex on history channel you find out that most knights had at least one mistress of nobility*
Yeah, that's always been debatable. I refuse to believe that courtly love never dealt with eroticism and even sexual encounters. Men now, and men then weren't going to follow that path for long if they weren't getting some nookie.
Yuriel wrote...
What's code of chivalry got something to do with internet White Knights or in other words, Flirts??..........The idea that the White Knights on Fakku are purposely coming to the defense of girls on Fakku in hopes of getting something from them by getting close to them (i.e. nude photos, cyber sex, whatever...)
Which many people think that courtly love (code of chivalry) was similar to in some respects.
0
Unos Hambalos wrote...
Am I considered as a White Knight?I dunno, I see you chase girls more than you protect them.
0
Tsurayu, yeah, there are women who do fall for such. I mean they dont say it openly but some enjoy it...
0
Im all for defending people, but White Knights, like you said waar, get so enraged that they forget to use logic. Its really funny watching them, so I say just let them do what they do.
Tiz 4 teh Lulz!!!
Tiz 4 teh Lulz!!!
0
Spoiler:
Well by the age of 14 most of the squires of nobility were not virgins anymore and were still learning the code of chivarly
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
sorry, what part of my prospective was failed?
also, this thread is simply to address those who are the most fanatical, zealous members. I'm not talking about moderate defenders. Also ash, it's a tactic of the black knight to label anyone who defends someone else a WK... it's fairly effective as well considering how much everyone dislikes WK's. I don't remember the event in question but it is quite possible I was just warning you that you may look like one; I don't remember referring to anyone as WK recently.
also, this thread is simply to address those who are the most fanatical, zealous members. I'm not talking about moderate defenders. Also ash, it's a tactic of the black knight to label anyone who defends someone else a WK... it's fairly effective as well considering how much everyone dislikes WK's. I don't remember the event in question but it is quite possible I was just warning you that you may look like one; I don't remember referring to anyone as WK recently.