Christopher handley vs Dwight Whorley case difference
0
OKay so before u say something i know i know you are right there probably has been thousands of threads about this but before u say something. I know lolicon is in legal gray water but im confused about the sentencing of both of them?
When Dwight Whorley was convicted he was convicted under 18 usc 1446a, but i thought it was unconstitutional of that law.On the other hand Christopher Handley's case was different he was jailed under obscenity laws.(although he was charged under 18 usc 1466a those charges were dropped because it was unconstituional but how come Whorley was convicted under that 18 usc 1466a,which bans depictions of minors in sexual conduct.) So can someone answer my question is the law 18 usc 1446a unconstitutional and what would be the maximum punishment of it? Would the punishment be the same as real child porn? So did the Supreme Court say anything about the law 18 usc 1466a?( I dont think Supreme court did say anything about it since the Protect Act of 2003 is still being used against people such as Dwight Whorley, Christopher Handley,and Steven Kutzner.) My most important question of all is that would the sentencing for lolicon be the same as child porn?
When Dwight Whorley was convicted he was convicted under 18 usc 1446a, but i thought it was unconstitutional of that law.On the other hand Christopher Handley's case was different he was jailed under obscenity laws.(although he was charged under 18 usc 1466a those charges were dropped because it was unconstituional but how come Whorley was convicted under that 18 usc 1466a,which bans depictions of minors in sexual conduct.) So can someone answer my question is the law 18 usc 1446a unconstitutional and what would be the maximum punishment of it? Would the punishment be the same as real child porn? So did the Supreme Court say anything about the law 18 usc 1466a?( I dont think Supreme court did say anything about it since the Protect Act of 2003 is still being used against people such as Dwight Whorley, Christopher Handley,and Steven Kutzner.) My most important question of all is that would the sentencing for lolicon be the same as child porn?
0
No.
Lolicons shouldn't be treated as the same as child pornography addicts. If he loves young and cute anime chicks then it is not so bad as the real deal ACTUALLY HAVING real child pornography in his pc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon
It is just a complex some people have and it just an obsession over manga chicks.
It is not the real thing and it has "not alot" of connections to real young girls.
If a guy got caught having children naked in his image folder then I get really scared because I don't know where he got those pictures and I could call the cops to see if he is a child molester or not, but if I see a guy having young anime chicks in his folder posing sexually then it's not a big deal because they are so darn cute and that he has a complex that "rarely" gets outta control.
Anime and reality are two very different things.
I really think the justice system are getting a little retarded because of this issue, but it is an interesting topic you brought off.
I like young girls in anime series and I am proud of it. (Standing tall on a mountain with the clothes of a karate master with the symbol Lolicon on his back)
Lolicons shouldn't be treated as the same as child pornography addicts. If he loves young and cute anime chicks then it is not so bad as the real deal ACTUALLY HAVING real child pornography in his pc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon
It is just a complex some people have and it just an obsession over manga chicks.
It is not the real thing and it has "not alot" of connections to real young girls.
If a guy got caught having children naked in his image folder then I get really scared because I don't know where he got those pictures and I could call the cops to see if he is a child molester or not, but if I see a guy having young anime chicks in his folder posing sexually then it's not a big deal because they are so darn cute and that he has a complex that "rarely" gets outta control.
Anime and reality are two very different things.
I really think the justice system are getting a little retarded because of this issue, but it is an interesting topic you brought off.
I like young girls in anime series and I am proud of it. (Standing tall on a mountain with the clothes of a karate master with the symbol Lolicon on his back)
0
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
you have to face the fact that Loli, Shota and other things do not pass the Miller Test. Therefore loli is not protected by the first amendment.
0
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
No.Lolicons shouldn't be treated as the same as child pornography addicts. If he loves young and cute anime chicks then it is not so bad as the real deal ACTUALLY HAVING real child pornography in his pc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon
It is just a complex some people have and it just an obsession over manga chicks.
It is not the real thing and it has "not alot" of connections to real young girls.
If a guy got caught having children naked in his image folder then I get really scared because I don't know where he got those pictures and I could call the cops to see if he is a child molester or not, but if I see a guy having young anime chicks in his folder posing sexually then it's not a big deal because they are so darn cute and that he has a complex that "rarely" gets outta control.
Anime and reality are two very different things.
I really think the justice system are getting a little retarded because of this issue, but it is an interesting topic you brought off.
I like young girls in anime series and I am proud of it. (Standing tall on a mountain with the clothes of a karate master with the symbol Lolicon on his back)
0
say what! wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
you have to face the fact that Loli, Shota and other things do not pass the Miller Test. Therefore loli is not protected by the first amendment.So if the image or video fails the Miller test it is illegal I know but when it fail the miller test do they charge u with obscenity law or child porn law?