CNN Feed "Drops" as US Soldier Praises Ron Paul's policies
0
This will be the new conspiracy theory. I hear Fox reported this from a different angle. And if the connection was bad, then BOTH screens would have lost connection!
Either way, it's just plain horrible reporting! He was a soldier who would DIE to protect our freedoms! And they still skip over him because of something on THEIR fault?
0
Might be more of sabotage, if caused by human interference at all.
CNN had people from both sides back at the studio, so trust me, wasn't just a "right" lean. It's more likely that someone on the ground crew caused this, if anything.
CNN had people from both sides back at the studio, so trust me, wasn't just a "right" lean. It's more likely that someone on the ground crew caused this, if anything.
0
I'm an avid Ron Paul supporter and believe the media isn't giving him a fair shake but, even I think you're grasping at straws with this. The media wouldn't stoop to such childish tricks to discredit Paul. They simply wouldn't have even interviewed the corporal in the fist place.
They would rather ignore him outright than pull childish stunts. Example is when he became the 13th floor in a hotel. Whenever he would get 2nd or 3rd in a poll they would simply skip over him and mention those immediately below him. Jon Stewart even did a bit on how the media is treating him.
They would rather ignore him outright than pull childish stunts. Example is when he became the 13th floor in a hotel. Whenever he would get 2nd or 3rd in a poll they would simply skip over him and mention those immediately below him. Jon Stewart even did a bit on how the media is treating him.
1
I pretty much agree with FPoD, they wouldn't have interviewed him in the first place; this just makes bad publicity for CNN. I think there's a small chance that this was intentional, but it's very unlikely
0
Theres a delayed feed even for live broadcasting, if this truly was a conspiracy they simply would have pretended to never have been able to make contact or just drop the whole segment.
0
Darkhilt wrote...
Theres a delayed feed even for live broadcasting, if this truly was a conspiracy they simply would have pretended to never have been able to make contact or just drop the whole segment.hmm.... Your assumption lies in the fact that if CNN where to do such an action, they would have never
make a mistake...because...there' so... perfect?
In which case if CNN did not make a mistake...this topic would not exist in the first place...
and no evidence of a "conspiracy theory" would have been even argued upon.
And in this case, if CNN did make a mistake "in covering it up" you would have simply disregarded
the idea as false - basing the assumption that they could not make such a mistake.
Basing the assumption that a country/organization/person would not make such a mistake.
Is no less stating that that country/organization/person is would never make a mistake in the future.
And never making mistakes...is not human.
To me... this is a sign of very ignorant sceptecism.
0
Buruneko wrote...
Darkhilt wrote...
Theres a delayed feed even for live broadcasting, if this truly was a conspiracy they simply would have pretended to never have been able to make contact or just drop the whole segment.hmm.... Your assumption lies in the fact that if CNN where to do such an action, they would have never
make a mistake...because...there' so... perfect?
In which case if CNN did not make a mistake...this topic would not exist in the first place...
and no evidence of a "conspiracy theory" would have been even argued upon.
And in this case, if CNN did make a mistake "in covering it up" you would have simply disregarded
the idea as false - basing the assumption that they could not make such a mistake.
Basing the assumption that a country/organization/person would not make such a mistake.
Is no less stating that that country/organization/person is would never make a mistake in the future.
And never making mistakes...is not human.
To me... this is a sign of very ignorant sceptecism.
Meh assumption?More like obvious fact that broadcasting is placed in delay within the TV and radio media.Where are you even getting at with me calling them perfect?All I'm saying is that their not THAT stupid.Many times they've made mistakes, I'm just saying that a conspiracy is overhyped. And what do you mean it wouldn't be argued upon if there wasn't any preexisting evidence? Obviously this is just a chance for opposition supporters to smear CNN because of the unfortunate event of one of their own being silenced because of technical difficulty when they were proclaiming their stand.Anyways, continuing on the idea that they make mistakes, wouldn't a technical gaff be considered a mistake that in your statement is always a possibility?
0
Darkhilt wrote...
Buruneko wrote...
Darkhilt wrote...
Theres a delayed feed even for live broadcasting, if this truly was a conspiracy they simply would have pretended to never have been able to make contact or just drop the whole segment.hmm.... Your assumption lies in the fact that if CNN where to do such an action, they would have never
make a mistake...because...there' so... perfect?
In which case if CNN did not make a mistake...this topic would not exist in the first place...
and no evidence of a "conspiracy theory" would have been even argued upon.
And in this case, if CNN did make a mistake "in covering it up" you would have simply disregarded
the idea as false - basing the assumption that they could not make such a mistake.
Basing the assumption that a country/organization/person would not make such a mistake.
Is no less stating that that country/organization/person is would never make a mistake in the future.
And never making mistakes...is not human.
To me... this is a sign of very ignorant sceptecism.
Meh assumption?More like obvious fact that broadcasting is placed in delay within the TV and radio media.Where are you even getting at with me calling them perfect?All I'm saying is that their not THAT stupid.Many times they've made mistakes, I'm just saying that a conspiracy is overhyped. And what do you mean it wouldn't be argued upon if there wasn't any preexisting evidence? Obviously this is just a chance for opposition supporters to smear CNN because of the unfortunate event of one of their own being silenced because of technical difficulty when they were proclaiming their stand.Anyways, continuing on the idea that they make mistakes, wouldn't a technical gaff be considered a mistake that in your statement is always a possibility?
...I guess we are both ignorant sceptics.
We know nothing and ultimate cannot make any conclusions in this matter.
0
Buruneko wrote...
Darkhilt wrote...
Buruneko wrote...
Darkhilt wrote...
Theres a delayed feed even for live broadcasting, if this truly was a conspiracy they simply would have pretended to never have been able to make contact or just drop the whole segment.hmm.... Your assumption lies in the fact that if CNN where to do such an action, they would have never
make a mistake...because...there' so... perfect?
In which case if CNN did not make a mistake...this topic would not exist in the first place...
and no evidence of a "conspiracy theory" would have been even argued upon.
And in this case, if CNN did make a mistake "in covering it up" you would have simply disregarded
the idea as false - basing the assumption that they could not make such a mistake.
Basing the assumption that a country/organization/person would not make such a mistake.
Is no less stating that that country/organization/person is would never make a mistake in the future.
And never making mistakes...is not human.
To me... this is a sign of very ignorant sceptecism.
Meh assumption?More like obvious fact that broadcasting is placed in delay within the TV and radio media.Where are you even getting at with me calling them perfect?All I'm saying is that their not THAT stupid.Many times they've made mistakes, I'm just saying that a conspiracy is overhyped. And what do you mean it wouldn't be argued upon if there wasn't any preexisting evidence? Obviously this is just a chance for opposition supporters to smear CNN because of the unfortunate event of one of their own being silenced because of technical difficulty when they were proclaiming their stand.Anyways, continuing on the idea that they make mistakes, wouldn't a technical gaff be considered a mistake that in your statement is always a possibility?
...I guess we are both ignorant sceptics.
We know nothing and ultimate cannot make any conclusions in this matter.
More than likely XD.