[Locked] Humans VS Nature
-1
Those believing that we can live in harmony with nature simply don't know how nature is supposed to work.
Species extinction is not a human brutality, it's a natural phenomenon called natural selection.
If white rhinoceros can't fit in a environment where semi-intelligent monkeys with guns are dominant that's its issue.
Ρespectively, humans might not be able to fit in with how fast aids virus is progressing.
Do you think the virus gives a flying !@#$?
Aids is gonna keep spreading its gene, if that means human extinction so be it.
It's neither evil nor good, it is what it is.
If we get obliterated it's our fault for not defending ourselves, not the virus attacking.
Nature has survived meteor showers, ice ages and other global scale destructions(Justin Bieber?) and has proven it can handle everything just fine, but we humans with our limited lifespan see only the death around us and not rebirth that takes place after it.
Let's not have delusions of grandeur, as much as incapable we are of saving nature we are equally incapable of destroying it.
Before we start caring about saving nature or w/e we should start caring about saving us, mostly from ourselves.
Deceases, wars, poverty & making environment uninhabitable for future generations of our own species...
Nature has survived long before humans came into the picture and will continue after we are gone too.
Stop hugging trees, humans need it more.
Species extinction is not a human brutality, it's a natural phenomenon called natural selection.
If white rhinoceros can't fit in a environment where semi-intelligent monkeys with guns are dominant that's its issue.
Ρespectively, humans might not be able to fit in with how fast aids virus is progressing.
Do you think the virus gives a flying !@#$?
Aids is gonna keep spreading its gene, if that means human extinction so be it.
It's neither evil nor good, it is what it is.
If we get obliterated it's our fault for not defending ourselves, not the virus attacking.
Nature has survived meteor showers, ice ages and other global scale destructions(Justin Bieber?) and has proven it can handle everything just fine, but we humans with our limited lifespan see only the death around us and not rebirth that takes place after it.
Let's not have delusions of grandeur, as much as incapable we are of saving nature we are equally incapable of destroying it.
Before we start caring about saving nature or w/e we should start caring about saving us, mostly from ourselves.
Deceases, wars, poverty & making environment uninhabitable for future generations of our own species...
Nature has survived long before humans came into the picture and will continue after we are gone too.
Stop hugging trees, humans need it more.
0
Yeah freaking nature can take of herself us on the other hand. well u can say that we freaking need protection.
0
Thank you for explaining what I learned in 9th grade science class, also it's okay to swear on the internet.
0
erikj1508 wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
Who the fuck hugs trees.you're seriously retarded.
Retarded threads get retarded responses, suck it up.
0
Girlfountain wrote...
erikj1508 wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
Who the fuck hugs trees.you're seriously retarded.
Retarded threads get retarded responses, suck it up.
your reputation says enough about your reasons for being here in the first place.
0
erikj1508 wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
erikj1508 wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
Who the fuck hugs trees.you're seriously retarded.
Retarded threads get retarded responses, suck it up.
your reputation says enough about your reasons for being here in the first place.
Yep to whack off, why else would I be on a porn site.
Btw, rep means nothing moron.
0
Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.OHGAWDTHEHYPOCRISYISDELICIOUS
Let's not forget this gem of a thread GirlFountain: https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=67821#2148753
0
GroverCleaveland wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.OHGAWDTHEHYPOCRISYISDELICIOUS
Let's not forget this gem of a thread GirlFountain: https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=67821#2148753
Is my opinion allowed to change or will you consider old threads proper evidence of my current feelings.
0
Girlfountain wrote...
GroverCleaveland wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.OHGAWDTHEHYPOCRISYISDELICIOUS
Let's not forget this gem of a thread GirlFountain: https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=67821#2148753
Is my opinion allowed to change or will you consider old threads proper evidence of my current feelings.
Is your opinion allowed to change? Why, yes. Of course it is.
Are past statements and STAUNCH defenses of a certain position allowed to be switched with attacks on others who hold the belief you once defended? Most certainly. I just think it strange that your opinion did such a rapid about-face once your own rep score went negative.
Do you think it is because you are loathe to be considered in the same way you once considered others with such low scores? Could it possibly be because you are inconsistent in your beliefs and only hold onto them as long as they are beneficial to you?
No. I'm sure I am just being ridiculous. There's no way any of that could be the case is there?
0
GroverCleaveland wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
GroverCleaveland wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.OHGAWDTHEHYPOCRISYISDELICIOUS
Let's not forget this gem of a thread GirlFountain: https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=67821#2148753
Is my opinion allowed to change or will you consider old threads proper evidence of my current feelings.
Is your opinion allowed to change? Why, yes. Of course it is.
Are past statements and STAUNCH defenses of a certain position allowed to be switched with attacks on others who hold the belief you once defended? Most certainly. I just think it strange that your opinion did such a rapid about-face once your own rep score went negative.
Do you think it is because you are loathe to be considered in the same way you once considered others with such low scores? Could it possibly be because you are inconsistent in your beliefs and only hold onto them as long as they are beneficial to you?
No. I'm sure I am just being ridiculous. There's no way any of that could be the case is there?
Your entire argument is based on assumption, I am not at all backing what is specifically only beneficial to me, I am simply enlightening the previous user on how rep works here. From what I have seen, there is no moralistic values in reputation on this site.
People change, you make it seem like that's something to be ashamed of.
0
Girlfountain wrote...
GroverCleaveland wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
GroverCleaveland wrote...
Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.Girlfountain wrote...
Btw, rep means nothing moron.OHGAWDTHEHYPOCRISYISDELICIOUS
Let's not forget this gem of a thread GirlFountain: https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=67821#2148753
Is my opinion allowed to change or will you consider old threads proper evidence of my current feelings.
Is your opinion allowed to change? Why, yes. Of course it is.
Are past statements and STAUNCH defenses of a certain position allowed to be switched with attacks on others who hold the belief you once defended? Most certainly. I just think it strange that your opinion did such a rapid about-face once your own rep score went negative.
Do you think it is because you are loathe to be considered in the same way you once considered others with such low scores? Could it possibly be because you are inconsistent in your beliefs and only hold onto them as long as they are beneficial to you?
No. I'm sure I am just being ridiculous. There's no way any of that could be the case is there?
Your entire argument is based on assumption, I am not at all backing what is specifically only beneficial to me, I am simply enlightening the previous user on how rep works here. From what I have seen, there is no moralistic values in reputation on this site.
People change, you make it seem like that's something to be ashamed of.
You're misinterpreting me. I am in no way implying that this is a bad change. It's good that you finally understand that rep is meaningless. All I am saying is that your attack on someone who holds the same views you held not so long ago is ill advised. To call someone a moron for thinking negative rep matters, you have to admit that you were also a complete moron a short while ago. I also find it quite difficult to believe that a statement such as "Rep means nothing, moron." was meant for a purpose as high as the "enlightenment", as you put it, of another individual.
I am, however, finding it a humorous "coincidence" that your views about rep shifted abruptly once you gained negative reputation yourself.
After all, correlation does not imply causation; it merely winks suggestively while pointing and mouthing "Over here!".