Should Obama be Elected again? Or thrown out?
0
How about NONE of them(save for Ron Paul), is that such a difficult concept to grasp? You are NOT obligated to vote in X Candidate. Just as you aren't obligated to spend money at X store, but rather as a consumer you pick and choose what you want to be most effective for you. If none of the candidates give a damn about our country, it's principles and our need for Nation-Building, then NONE of them are worth a vote. Rather yet, how about a man step up and say "I'll run this country, for our country", he's neither a Democrat or a Republican, he's an AMERICAN :D. And we can all say "AYE", he's our leader. And to the Corporate Washington sluts? Screw them all.
0
chriton wrote...
Spoiler:
I dunno.. I'v always had the same question too but people don't seem to mind.
0
give Obama some slack. Bush kinda fked him over with the debt. he kinda doesn't have a choice but to do socialist things, and fk up...... lol
0
42yen wrote...
give Obama some slack. Bush kinda fked him over with the debt. he kinda doesn't have a choice but to do socialist things, and fk up...... lolSlack for what? Obama appears to have no intention to protect the interests of the common American people. The AIG bailout was ridiculous, and he failed in his duties to protect our liberties with the NDAA!
It has nothing to do with debt. Though, the fact he sends troops to war everywhere like in Uganda for wars UNRELATED to Al-Qaeda, really does makes one scratch their head just what the heck is he even thinking!?
Isn't he the sheer example of our decent to dictatorship?
edit:
Lolwut, someone -1 repped me for this post? But isn't what I'm saying true? If you disagree with my statement about Obama, how about quoting this post and arguing otherwise that Obama does care about us?
0
I'm not from the US, but if I were, I'd say yes.
He is doing a pretty decent job, considering how crappy his country/the world is nowadays.
He also doesn't suppor the SOPA bill, so yeah.
He is doing a pretty decent job, considering how crappy his country/the world is nowadays.
He also doesn't suppor the SOPA bill, so yeah.
0
Yes, assuming there are no socialists that decide to run.
Obama sucks, but he's better than any of the Republican candidates by far. The Republican candidates are either total bigots (Perry, Bachmann, Santorum, Paul), encourage the abolition of porn (and hentai) (Romney, Santorum), theocrats (Paul, Bachmann), or sane but unpopular. Obama is somewhat open-minded and tolerant of all people.
Plus he has a sense of humor.
Obama sucks, but he's better than any of the Republican candidates by far. The Republican candidates are either total bigots (Perry, Bachmann, Santorum, Paul), encourage the abolition of porn (and hentai) (Romney, Santorum), theocrats (Paul, Bachmann), or sane but unpopular. Obama is somewhat open-minded and tolerant of all people.
Plus he has a sense of humor.
0
Lishy1 wrote...
42yen wrote...
give Obama some slack. Bush kinda fked him over with the debt. he kinda doesn't have a choice but to do socialist things, and fk up...... lolSlack for what? Obama appears to have no intention to protect the interests of the common American people. The AIG bailout was ridiculous, and he failed in his duties to protect our liberties with the NDAA!
It has nothing to do with debt. Though, the fact he sends troops to war everywhere like in Uganda for wars UNRELATED to Al-Qaeda, really does makes one scratch their head just what the heck is he even thinking!?
Isn't he the sheer example of our decent to dictatorship?
Don't forget about a future war with Iran.
0
Obama catches most of the flak for problems that aren't his fault, namely carryovers from Bush's presidency and bills Congress overrides him on. However, I frown upon his actions in Libya and in the Middle East in general.
I believe he's favorable to the other candidates, but I'd prefer someone more pacifistic.
I believe he's favorable to the other candidates, but I'd prefer someone more pacifistic.
0
Rito Ayasaki wrote...
jayizdrunk wrote...
xlightxmonkeyx wrote...
Were not judging him on color as jay up there...I am black too. But I mean he stop half stopped a war. Bin Laden was killed under his authority. What else could we want? Forgetting about the healthcare and the other stuff he mentioned in the beginning of his presidency; he did a good job better than Bush who got us in Debt any way. <---My opinion. Still whether he gets elected is up to us. In my opinion I prefer a democrat...
I'm not judging Obama on color, but I feel like it's important to discuss race no matter what. America can't seem to clarify what's important and what isn't when it comes to race, but let's be honest...A LOT OF PEOPLE VOTED FOR HIM BECAUSE HE IS A BLACK GUY. The same sentiment will not be there come Election Day. Now it will be about him being a politician, rather than it was the first go round.
But would you choose him?
If I see a significant change between now and election day, sure. Because unless Ron Paul is picked for the Republicans (despite my problems with him and some of his ideology), I don't see anyone who's going to represent my interests.
0
TheEpicSock wrote...
The Republican candidates are either total bigots (Perry, Bachmann, Santorum, Paul), encourage the abolition of porn (and hentai) (Romney, Santorum), theocrats (Paul, Bachmann)Let me correct you here.
Paul is not a bigot and anyone who tells you so if grossly misinformed. In order to properly correct you, I need to know what leads you to believe Dr. Paul is a bigot.
Secondly, while Dr. Paul is a religious man, he has a proven track record of not forcing his religious beliefs on others like some of the other Republican Candidates. He believes in keeping his religion personal and not forcing it on others.
Randumb wrote...
Obama catches most of the flak for problems that aren't his fault, namely carryovers from Bush's presidency and bills Congress overrides him on.Congress has yet to "override" Obama on anything. Considering Obama has yet to Veto anything that the congress voted 2/3rd majority on. So that statement is completely false. Congress can only "override" the President in terms of a Veto.
The "blame Bush" excuse should have ended a while back. It's been 4 years, if you can't accomplish anything in 4 years then you won't accomplish anything with 4 more years. Just look at the failed campaign promises;
He promised to close GitMo. It's still open.
He promised to protect our civil liberties, he renewed the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. act and signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law.
The patriot act and NDAA should be enough of a clue to what his priorities are.
0
If someone punches you, then gives you $100 bucks, it doesn't mean they're a nice person.
That sums up Obama and most of the Republican nominees.
We have to stop taking the "lesser evils" for a president. Because if what they're saying makes no sense as an individual, then why the fuck are we trusting them with power!? Even if they give you $100 bucks and promise other things, they still punch and abuse you!
That sums up Obama and most of the Republican nominees.
We have to stop taking the "lesser evils" for a president. Because if what they're saying makes no sense as an individual, then why the fuck are we trusting them with power!? Even if they give you $100 bucks and promise other things, they still punch and abuse you!
0
Lishy1 wrote...
If someone punches you, then gives you $100 bucks, it doesn't mean they're a nice person.That sums up Obama and most of the Republican nominees.
We have to stop taking the "lesser evils" for a president. Because if what they're saying makes no sense as an individual, then why the fuck are we trusting them with power!? Even if they give you $100 bucks and promise other things, they still punch and abuse you!
It really sums up all of Parliament, what do you think that Obama passed the National Defense Authorization Act all on his own? No, a majority of the House and the Senate had to pass it before it reached Lord Obama's desk! So, we're talking conservatively 3/5ths of our "representatives" are traitors to the American People, but given the 80/20 ratio in most votes it's fair to say 4/5th's.
"So, we still have 20% of Parliament on our side, yay!". Not so fast, of that 20% 15% of them would vote for treason in the next following bill, the reasoning coming from political bribes and payoffs and those cute little things called a "Political Action Committee." All in the name of 'democracy'!
America as a country has to take a real good look at our politics before casting ANY vote. For my part, I'm not voting for a Republican or a Democrat no matter who his name is, or what his stature may be. The Corporate Party, has betrayed and shunned the American People.
0
xlightxmonkeyx wrote...
As most of you know presidential elections are coming up. Obama's approval ratings are going down. Do you think he deserves another term or be thrown out?Thoughts, opinions down below.IF! he opposed the SOPA bill he should be elected again if he support it, then there is other's who can lead a nation while preserving the nation freedom of the internet.
You know what i mean.
0
Qrast wrote...
xlightxmonkeyx wrote...
As most of you know presidential elections are coming up. Obama's approval ratings are going down. Do you think he deserves another term or be thrown out?Thoughts, opinions down below.IF! he opposed the SOPA bill he should be elected again if he support it, then there is other's who can lead a nation while preserving the nation freedom of the internet.
You know what i mean.
Oh yeah the SOPA sucks man, my professors in my University think it's so damn good. They earn enough money to buy the shit, that's being censored.
0
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Secondly, while Dr. Paul is a religious man, he has a proven track record of not forcing his religious beliefs on others like some of the other Republican Candidates. He believes in keeping his religion personal and not forcing it on others.
...
The "blame Bush" excuse should have ended a while back. It's been 4 years, if you can't accomplish anything in 4 years then you won't accomplish anything with 4 more years. Just look at the failed campaign promises;
He promised to close GitMo. It's still open.
He promised to protect our civil liberties, he renewed the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. act and signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law.
The patriot act and NDAA should be enough of a clue to what his priorities are.
This is why I've decided to support Ron Paul. He doesn't change his stances to suit different audiences, and is sensible on a lot of issues like public school system, monetary system, foreign policy. He has been consistent for 20+ years. His policies may not sound comfortable at first, but then you realize that he makes the most sense out of everyone. And yes, he is religious but never forces his own beliefs on others.
I say out with Obama. We don't need more federal regulations or continued military presence in other countries.