The Future for Japan

0
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
As the title implies, I am seeking opinion about Japan's economic future, geopolitical future, social structure and how it is going to change / not change in the future, the mentality of her people and the list goes on.

The reason why I have decided to come up with this topic is fuelled by an interest in Japan and more importantly her role in Northeast Asia. Since this site does to some extent, celebrate Japanese pop culture and I have heard that there are users living in Japan, I thought that it is appropriate to post this topic here.

If you don't mind, I will give my impressions of Japan (I may be very wrong in my analysis. Feel free to point that out):

It has very limited resources in comparison to other large and resource-rich countries like China, the Indo-Chinese states and even Indonesia and Malaysia. It lies on a semisically active area with frequent earthquakes, making life very difficult for the Japanese.

It is because of such an adverse environment, the Japanese decided to become militaristic and scour resources from her neighbours for the past half a millenia. It is also because of adversity, her people tend to be disciplined, and that made for the rapid economic progress she enjoyed the past half century, ever seeking to increase their productivity and the quality of the goods she produces.

How about now? Does Japan still possess these qualities in the face of an ageing population, economic stagnation, a generation who may be too pampered(?) What is Japan like as a society at whole? I don't think most of the population are into the J-pop culture we so adore (but again I might be wrong).

Are they a motivated people or do they feel bleak about the future?

Of course, the above text tends to centre too much on the mentality of the Japanese but I believe it would determine how her economic, societal and geopolitical future would be.

If it is okay with you, I would like to bring up the topic of Japan's future for discussion. (If you studied Japanese Studies, even better!)
0
If Japan wishes to survive, let alone compete with other Asian nations, it will have to reassess its migration policy. Japan will ultimately need to give opportunities for people from other countries to become citizens, and make the transition for them easier.

Get those who are well-educated, have good moral standing and around the age of twenties (so more opportunity to make babies. lol). This way, Japan will not only get capable workers but also get those who can potentially repopulate the dwindling numbers of the country.

In terms of economy, Japan should focus more on technology and services. Try to become number one again in technology in Asia. Re-focus on high technology, computers and machinery. Also, strengthen trading with China, Korea (both North and South) and the rest of Asia (including the Middle East). Forget the US and the EU. Most of the those economies of those countries are going down anyway. Especially the US, it's a crumbling empire now.
0
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Anesthetize wrote...
Above two posts are so dumb i cannot even be bothered explaining why. Maybe when i'm not tired.


Then I will be glad to hear out why you think this thread is dumb. At least you will be making a contribution to this thread.

YES LETS ALL MAKE PREDISPOSITIONED STATEMENTS OUT OF FLAWED LOGIC AND REASONING AND ACT LIKE WE'RE PROFESSORS IN GEOPOLITICS.


This is what Serious Discussion is for isn't it? If you think arguments are flawed, point them out! If a professor in geopolitics is part of this community, even better, let him post on this thread! Whatever that is expressed here are opinions, not facts, subject to refinement.

If you think the thread is inappropriate, get the moderators to do something about it.

Anesthetize wrote...
No it isn't. If you want to have a debate then go to one of BigLundi's wankfest philosophy thread.


I want an airing of opinions, not a debate. If you haven't realised, Serious Discussion is littered with what you call unresearched generalisations. And I suggest you contribute to the discussion by bringing in material that refutes or supports whatever that has been discussed. Set an example!
0
leonard267 wrote...
Anesthetize wrote...
Above two posts are so dumb i cannot even be bothered explaining why. Maybe when i'm not tired.


Then I will be glad to hear out why you think this thread is dumb. At least you will be making a contribution to this thread.

YES LETS ALL MAKE PREDISPOSITIONED STATEMENTS OUT OF FLAWED LOGIC AND REASONING AND ACT LIKE WE'RE PROFESSORS IN GEOPOLITICS.


This is what Serious Discussion is for isn't it? If you think arguments are flawed, point them out! If a professor in geopolitics is part of this community, even better, let him post on this thread! Whatever that is expressed here are opinions, not facts.


No it isn't. If you want to have a debate then go to one of BigLundi's wankfest philosophy thread. If you want to have a discussion about current events then come back to me with some news articles, videos or something, not an un-researched post of generalizations that is more suitable for a hipster's tumblr account.
0
Fukushima Daiichi is still a major factor however, I suspect.
0
Waar FAKKU Moderator
Please stay on topic in SD gentlemen.
0
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Waar wrote...
Please stay on topic in SD gentlemen.


I apologise. I've lost my composure.

Lishy1 wrote...
Fukushima Daiichi is still a major factor however, I suspect.


There is so much to say about the after effects of the Touhou disaster! Just heard a report about Japan's economy this morning, something concerning Japan's economic performance that is fuelled by a recovery in the US economy, spending on rebuilding efforts, though a slowing Chinese economy and possible worsening of the Eurozone crisis.

The Touhou disaster to me fuels consumption in construction, taking in mind that there is always opportunity in adversity. If I am not mistaken about the resilience and resourcefulness about the Japanese, I'd expect innovations in building, opportunities in entrepreneurship, things that power the economy or ensure the health of the economy.

As for the nuclear disaster, the shift away from nuclear power, I think is rather questionable. Granted that they attempted to shut down nuclear power plants in stages (I believe), it nonetheless appears to be creating strains in power supply, I've heard there is rationing of electricity. (Do tell me if I am wrong in anyway). Any closure of power plants must be accompanied by an alternative source of energy.
0
guammastermind671 Da RL Lurker at FAKKU
Two words...Technology advancement...nuff said.