Getting tired of the newest COD already...

Seriously, Call of duty is all over my inbox folder on youtube, and all the people i know that always bothers me on how bad that game is and how much better battlefield is, are buying and talking about the shit all the time right now. Wish that game would just disappear for existence sometimes...

I have always like Call of Duty to a point but i stop playing it as soon as the MW3 come out. I just find it hard to play sometimes and why i'm not as big as a fan of the games as i was a few years ago i never find myself saying i wish they stop making them. Yes a new Call of duty every year is getting a little old but it's one of the Top selling games of all time. So long as people play it we just have to put up with it. Wood i play Battlefield over Call of duty anytime now.

If you keep playing that same thing over and over your going to start to not like playing the game as much as you used too. And people well as fight over what MMFPS is the best one. If someone ask me why i like Battlefield i wood say the open lvls, Gun play and over all feel of the game. Why the Gun play in Call of duty is good i don't find it as fun.

To put a long story short.
:Is Call of duty getting old? Yes.
:Do i wish they stop making it? No. Cuz I may want to play the new one.
:Is Battlefield better then Call of Duty? Yes and No.

I don't give a shit about either CoD or Battlefield TBH.

Fighting games and JRPG master race faggots

I stopped caring about Call of Duty after MW2. Literally my friend bought it on Day 1 and I picked it up with him and we rushed home to play it. After playing it for an hour or so I said straight out "This feels like the same thing."

It's literally the same game over and over. People complain about Mario games being too similar to each other this is way worse. I honestly think they should do what Bungie did and just work on something completely different. I really don't understand why people spend money on the latest CoD when there aren't really many differences to make it worth $60

Cause we like to swing our dicks in MP? Since that is the main reason why people buy the bloody thing.

Last COD i bought was Black Ops 2 and that was complete unpolished shit.

And BF 3 was complete dissapointment. Tried too hard to be COD and failed like COD did. Even more if i think about it.

I beg to differ. I've always bought and played CoD for the campaign, and I still love Black Ops the most (the first one, the second was kinda meh). About Ghosts, I'm watching it on Youtube and well, so far I have mixed feelings about it.

Supply in demand.

I can't see why everyone keeps thinking it's the same game? This game does have a few new features such as Squads, Create-a-soldier, and Extinction. Honestly, many games tend to rehash their sequels and I see nobody complaining about them except for every new Call of Duty game.....

I've seen few people complain about BF4 iterating itself from BF3 and then the numerous Mario games.
But CoD takes it to whole new level, IW just doesn't seem to budge at all from MW1 and takes the ideas Treyarch made in their versions of the series.

2 years of development time with no major changes in the game engine and rehashing resources from the earlier games just speaks to me as lazy development in general. Every CoD by IW has always had this "buzzword" they use in places like E3 and all that. This year it was dogs / fish AI, MW2 time it was glass.. I can't recall what MW3 was.

Well like my friend said... it's not their fault they have a limit of time and money because of Activition... Activition is trying to get all the money they can from Call of Duty until it dies down, just like what happened to Guitar Hero series...

MW2 with shittier weapon balance, bad maps and spawn system that needs a proper facelift?

Because that was the first thing in my mind when i played it for the first time.

Atleast faceoff mode was somekind of a fix for it (not really)

Also, did some TwatField and Call of Dog fans got angry?

Yup.

Still mad :)

I don't really think it's that. Call of Duty: Ghosts had a 2 million dollar budget. Yet from what I've seen of it it's not much different from other CoD games. People can do much more with limited time and money, they just don't bother changing it up because they know people will still buy it. Since the makers of Call of Duty have long left Infinity Ward, it's only a matter of time before they have to face the facts and either start adding some features or the series will die like Guitar Hero or Tony Hawk.

I don't think they decide to keep it so similar because of laziness, but rather fear of screwing up. the team that made mw2 got all fired essentially, and they want to stay successful.

The biggest thing I've seen about Ghosts is the framerate issue.

As far as I know, it's on EVERY SINGLE VERSION(except the WiiU but lolWiiU). Even the PC version suffers from it.

And while I mildly enjoyed BO2, Ghosts doesn't have Ground War, so what little interest I had in it is gone. This game is a mess.

When it wasnt a mess?

O right,

It was perfect in COD 4. THEN it started to introduce failure.

"It's kind of a weird, ironic thing to say; They aren't hardcore gamers, or even gamers, but they play Call of Duty every night. And those guys are going to continue to play regardless of platform. So I think not only will we continue to engage with that existing player base, but we'll take next gen and see how far we can go with it." Source

If this can be interpreted as fact, these consumers (mentioned) don't purchase any other titles not associated with COD or BF. Their experience in gaming stretches maybe a few fps titles. For them, each COD may feel like a new game from their lack of experience in the gaming world. For them, it's probably like purchasing add-ons/dlc's.

They very much strike me as no different than the Mario crowd, except belligerent, unintelligent, and just plain rude.

To be honest, I haven't bought a Mario game since Super Mario Galaxy 2. After New Super Mario Bros. Wii they're been pretty darn similar so I really can't argue with you there.

At the very least though, they still have great level design and they put a lot of thought in using the new things they introduce into the game. New Super Mario Bros and New Super Mario Bros 2 share some striking similarities but I wouldn't go as far as to call them the same game. They at least feel like new titles.

I meant the fan base are similar in their undying loyalty to purchase the titles without question. I see the companies as 2 different extremes. The COD producers only want money, knowing that they're consumers are not expecting change, they put minimal effort into anything else but reproducing (content with their numbers). While the Nintendo ones are looking for a way to make what worked before work a 20th time by changing small bits (trying to grow their consumer numbers). Nintendo may be, more-or-less, activision's future.

If you want a Mario example, use the Mario Party's 9 or 10 now, Brawl is a good example too, I heard the new paper Mario felt no different from the first but I may be confusing the titles there.

I would say the problem Nintendo is in is that it revels in so much nostalgia that fans get pissed off when they try to do something different.

Lots of Zelda fans hated Wind Waker because of its cartoony graphics clashing with the darker and more serious nature of Ocarina and Majora. Then there's the infamous Pokemon "genwunners" that are a noticable part of the fanbase. With Brawl a lot of people (myself guilty) were pissed with the removal of moving air dodge (thus taking out wavedashing) and trying to make the competitive metagame less ridiculous.

At the very least Nintendo tries to occasionally do something different. Such as how they are publishing games from Platinum (such as Wonderful 101 and Bayonetta 2). If anything it seems Nintendo makes some mario games so they can get money to fund different ventures. Sometimes it's a hit (like Animal Crossing) and sometimes it's a miss (like the Virtual Boy). With stuff like the Wii U they at least try to be innovative. The PS4 and XboxOne are just stronger versions of their previous console. No matter what you say about the game recording ps4 allows, or the Kinect now coming with the console, at heart they are just the same thing except slightly improved hardware.

But I'm going on a tangent, this has nothing to do with CoD. The point is with CoD is that CoD fails to get better in any way thus it may fizzle like other Activision properties.

Their paying a third party for those titles, in that way they are different, but Nintendo rarely tries to come out with new IP's. With as much money, time, and man power they always had the option of experimenting and expanding with new works. Instead they kept returning to the same titles, reinventing them. I might agree that Nintendo's fan base locks them into being unable to change their core titles, but caving to that pressure just reinforces that the community can demand the same product over again. If they really thought Windwaker was a failure, they wouldn't have HD'd it. What I am trying to say, while you may hold the community responsible Nintendo seems more than willing to comply without fighting, even when it's successful.

Other than Zelda fan boys, I hear nothing but great things about Windwaker, I haven't played Ocarina/Mask, but out of the ones I've played it is my favorite. It's one of the titles getting me to consider buying a WiiU (still have the original).

Nintendo could always use those writers/programers from Zelda on a new title and just not call it Zelda, but they rely on name to sell copies, refusing to separate themselves from their past titles.

Not sure what virtual boy is The idea of giving up on experimenting due to a failure more than 15 years old would be a really bad excuse, And Animal Crossing is an old title that they redid/continued (dunno, haven't played any). It sounded like you were associating that as a new venture, so I wanted to say this if that was the case.

(Somethign to do with Call of Duty...) The adds are annoying, I keep getting them from gamestop... and I am afriad of the generation of gamers their breedings... where will they go once COD is over... Games are moving toward a more "Multiplayer" format with more social options... ~imagines T bagging kids talking (screaming) shit across every multiplayer game in the future~