Gambler Posts
ryuuhagoku wrote...
gizgal wrote...
And for ze ladies, I think peeing post-coitus might help kill sperm left from intercourse (don't quote me on this one, but it seems to make sense) ? What with its acidity and all, maybe? :s
After some light research, I found results that were a little mixed, but mostly pointed to urea reduces sperm viability. That said, I DO NOT RECOMMEND URINE AS A CONTRACEPTIVE. Normal human urine has a urea concentration of about 0.150M, which is lower than the concentration of urea used as a spermicide in any of the papers I found.
I'm assuming you're talking about a male urinating into the vagina post-coitus, because a female would have to be very skilled or a leaky faucet to pull that off with any measure of success.
Yeah, I am rather positive that it is in no way an effective form of contraception, but yeah, some apparent effect.
Kavi wrote...
During my long history of not having any sex life, I think that not being horny is the most uncommon reason to keeping it that way. I can't speak for all of the womankind, but there are multiple things that hold you back from initiating sex and make you turn down offers, even when you are horny. Spoiler:
Oh man, 1, 2, and 5 = story of my life.
However, that said, yeah, horniness happens a LOT for me.
Sometimes in relation to bodily cycles, but sometimes just out of nowhere. But like other users mentioned, medication makes prolonged periods of it tough... dammit.
ooooooowwww that happened to me at summer camp once. no fun.
also, apparently I sat on a bee nest as a toddler... don't recall it myself, but I heard it was bad for me.
also, apparently I sat on a bee nest as a toddler... don't recall it myself, but I heard it was bad for me.
And for ze ladies, I think peeing post-coitus might help kill sperm left from intercourse (don't quote me on this one, but it seems to make sense) ?
What with its acidity and all, maybe? :s
What with its acidity and all, maybe? :s
Lollikittie wrote...
gizgal wrote...
You make me cry for the future.
D: Honey, don't. Remember that there are still plenty of people out there like us. Don't get hung up on those who aren't.
I know that.
But comments like some in this thread are just so fucked up. Do they not realize every time they make light of rape or inadvertently victim-blame, that's a huge trigger for any survivors of this stuff?
Princess Luna wrote...
They are asking to be raped, even though they say they are not, they want it. You make me cry for the future. Actually, you make me cringe at any future interactions you might have: do you not realize that you're victim-blaming?
Any time you say that, you have a huge chance of being around someone who's been assaulted or raped and heard that exact same bullshit logic justifying the horrors enacted on their bodies.
I love both, but I could only ever really live with dogs. I just cannot stand cat shedding and claws... but they are adorable.
Keitaro Ito wrote...
Slut Movement VideoWatch this video and tell me whether or not it should be allowed or not - Also vote in the poll.
Thanks.
P.s Tell us why you think it should or should not be allowed too..
Yes. They are important and making noise for a good reason.
Just because someone wears something does not give anyone the liberty to harass them. Your body, your choice; wearing certain clothing has nothing to do with sexual preference, desire to engage in sex, or desire to be harassed.
Seriously. It just makes sense.
That said, if one wants to garner respect in certain social situations, jobs, and places, dressing appropriately (modesty according to the relationship with those there) is fine and good.
"SlutWalk began in Toronto on April 2011, when a Toronto police officer spoke at a law school and said that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized."
This has cause an outcry to take back the word slut in order to no longer be oppressed by 'slut-shaming'
SlutWalk wants to impose the message onto our community that no matter what a person is wearing, they do not deserve to be sexually abused or raped. Violence is never deserved- no matter what a person wears, who they associate with, or who they are.
Anyone can be rationalized to be a slut- but no one deserves to be raped."
--- for those confused, that's the mission statement (in so many words, taken from an example event at my school this weekend" of these movements. It's not about "YAAAAAAAAY LET'S ALL DRESS LIKE SLUTS AND TEASE MEN"; it's about safety, personal choice, and telling authorities that such judgement of sexual activity based only on clothing is WRONG.

Frankly, some of the replies in this thread both scare and bring me to tears. You can joke all day long about how "no means yes", "asking for it", "unlocked cars" and etc., but realize that you are ENDORSING rapists by justifying their actions.
Victim blaming in any form just lets criminals slip by through this world, and keeps fear instilled in so so many women (and men) who feel unsafe in their own environments.
And once again, rapists don't give a fuck about clothing, so blaming outward appearance is immaterial and victim blaming makes ZERO sense: if a person is going to rape, they will do it no matter the outfit (think prison, child abuse, domestic violence, etc).
I find this image (and others like it, showing clearly "modestly dressed" people) make this point even stronger than words can.



And again, the recent case with Trayvon Martin once again proves: being dressed (or of a certain racial appearance) a certain way does not mean an invitation for physical harm, or assumption of character.
Spoiler:
Kavi wrote...
Happened last week, actually, and loved it. I was pessimistically almost sure that I would be disappointed: you know how it goes that you see something in porn and try it out, but in reality it might not be what you imagined it to be.Penis had really no flavour that I could detect, didn't get to taste sperm though. He told me to stop before he came. Either he didn't want to do it in my mouth even though I said it would be nice... or I just sucked too bad. I didn't really have guts to ask, and maybe I'm happier not knowing. xD
Rofl, this was like me, too: my (ex)bf didn't want to either! Took a few months but finally convinced him to let me finish him... never even got to swallow, rofl, didn't wanna push it.
cruz737 wrote...
What kind of gender issues.Issues in pop culture and online culture. I'll post it when I'm done~
artcellrox wrote...
MS what? That's the first I'm hearing of this. o_OPublisher. It's in Microsoft Office.
Gender issues stuff.
Online stuff.
Super exciting group project due tomorrow. Yep... and I just ordered food.
Anyone happen to be good with MS Publisher? We're using it for formatting but I'm not having a ton of luck finding good border templates.
Online stuff.
Super exciting group project due tomorrow. Yep... and I just ordered food.
Anyone happen to be good with MS Publisher? We're using it for formatting but I'm not having a ton of luck finding good border templates.
Sockjob69 wrote...
I have been a member of FAKKU for a long time and I want to start out by saying that there isn't anything wrong with the way that the Tags page is setup now, but I thought it might be nice to touch up the Sort by...Tag page with animated gifs instead of just the stills that are there now. I thought that animated gifs would give the tags a little something different.What do you guys think?
Animated gifs wouldn't make sense: the media the tags refer to are still images from manga pages.
