gizgal Posts
Cool outcome, but remember that in general people do NOT want to have NSFW stuff on their feeds, as if someone sees them seeing IT, it looks bad on THEM.
Also, none of your irl friends really need to be exposed to what you fap to so....without notice.
Also, none of your irl friends really need to be exposed to what you fap to so....without notice.
sad thing is I have seen people pretty openly posting fave pics and links on the F! FB fanpage. using their real name.
god.
god.
Tsujoi wrote...
So Tenga has made a toy for women now.http://www.kanojotoys.com/tenga-iroha-vibrator-p-1505.html
>pricepoint: 100+ USD
...and here I thought they were all about making affordable toys. :(
Guess it's only thrifty for the dick-oriented stuff.
>getting "henna" tats from a sketchy place
Yeah, not only are you culturally appropriating henna, you're doing it wrong and idiotically. Lawl.
Yeah, not only are you culturally appropriating henna, you're doing it wrong and idiotically. Lawl.
We have tags, and not votes, because art's subject matter is always, by definition, subjective to taste.
If anything, porn lets people REVERSE stereotypes when they desire that.
Why not crack down on actual filmed rape and CP instead?
Why not crack down on actual filmed rape and CP instead?
LustfulAngel wrote...
gizgal wrote...
LustfulAngel wrote...
We're speaking of "Male Privilege"(Which I and a few others has proven doesn't in fact exist in the modern age.), which in turn brings about the Feminist discussion, which in large part deals with the degradation of the feminineAbortion is a very large part of that degradation(of humanity overall), for the only defense applicable being: "It's our choice". It would be very interesting if fetus's could develop telepathic communication and asked for the chance of life, what would Loli do in that situation?
A choice, at the expense of another is sickening. And if this nation is going to talk about life, liberty and independence, then it needs to be serious.
According to the numbers, 5,000 lives were taken via back door abortions. 53 million lives have been taken via legal abortion, and according to a recent study, about as many as 300,000 women are affected with Breast Cancer.
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/11/26/study-shows-abortion-linked-to-high-breast-cancer-risk/
Does anyone see anything wrong here? The Feminist idea of reform is totally backwards from actually improving the quality of life.
ROFL OMG YOU DO KNOW THAT ENTIRE "STUDY" WAS SHOWN TO BE A HUGE SCAM, SURELY?
AS FUCKING LONG AGO AS 1997.
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/09/us/big-study-finds-no-link-in-abortion-and-cancer.html
http://ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/FactorsThatDoNotIncreaseRisk.html
God now you've just done all the work FOR me, ha, way to shoot your own credibility down quickly more than you already have! Christ, I actually laughed aloud when I saw you posted that tripe.
The whole bullshit "abortion causes breast cancer" argument has been used among conservative pseudo-scientific communities for ages. It's extremely fucked up, misleading, and sad that people are still buying into the shit they peddle.
Ouch, sounds like I hit a nerve when someone has to type in all capitals. Furthermore, referencing a 1997 study. REALLY? Furthermore, I'd like to take notice that the particular study I linked to was in Asia, not America.
The different dynamics also impacts Case studies(IE: In China, a case study is more likely to be accurate than in America)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kioSuxh2QIw
When we talk psuedo-science, most liberal tree nuthuggers believe we have an impact on the earth's climate. A suggestion about as logical as stating that we can control people's thoughts.
BAHAHAHAHHAHA HOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLY SHIT YOU ARE TOO FAR GONE, DUDE.
I'm out, this is just cracking me up at this point. X'D
LustfulAngel wrote...
We're speaking of "Male Privilege"(Which I and a few others has proven doesn't in fact exist in the modern age.), which in turn brings about the Feminist discussion, which in large part deals with the degradation of the feminineAbortion is a very large part of that degradation(of humanity overall), for the only defense applicable being: "It's our choice". It would be very interesting if fetus's could develop telepathic communication and asked for the chance of life, what would Loli do in that situation?
A choice, at the expense of another is sickening. And if this nation is going to talk about life, liberty and independence, then it needs to be serious.
According to the numbers, 5,000 lives were taken via back door abortions. 53 million lives have been taken via legal abortion, and according to a recent study, about as many as 300,000 women are affected with Breast Cancer.
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/11/26/study-shows-abortion-linked-to-high-breast-cancer-risk/
Does anyone see anything wrong here? The Feminist idea of reform is totally backwards from actually improving the quality of life.
ROFL OMG YOU DO KNOW THAT ENTIRE "STUDY" WAS SHOWN TO BE A HUGE SCAM, SURELY?
AS FUCKING LONG AGO AS 1997.
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/09/us/big-study-finds-no-link-in-abortion-and-cancer.html
http://ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/FactorsThatDoNotIncreaseRisk.html
God now you've just done all the work FOR me, ha, way to shoot your own credibility down quickly more than you already have! Christ, I actually laughed aloud when I saw you posted that tripe.
The whole bullshit "abortion causes breast cancer" argument has been used among conservative pseudo-scientific communities for ages. It's extremely fucked up, misleading, and sad that people are still buying into the shit they peddle.
theotherjacob wrote...
gizgal wrote...
It's funny that you don't realize privilege applies to other aspects of people besides sex. I'm talking racial, class, sexuality, and ability privileges combined with anyone of the female sex, fool.
For example, as I mentioned previously in this very thread, as an upper-middle-class white straight able bodied female, I most fucking certainly have privileges.
I don't see the draft as a privilege, I was referring to the laws surrounding it only applying to males. If you read the very quote I was replying to, that would be rather damn clear.
We're not talking about racial privilage, or class privilage or ability privilage. That was clearly stated. We are talking about male privilage and female privilage. That is all we are talking about, stop trying to change the subject and twist it to your own logic.
The laws around the draft aren't privilage either. Anything to do with the draft whatsoever is not a privilage. If you don't see the draft as a privilage, than the laws around the draft can not be a privilage cause you can't have one without the other.
Do you even read my posts or just look at certain lines and respond?
I was pointing out how off track you were getting to begin with, really. Also, I'm staying the fuck out of this thread for now as it's pretty clear everyone's just intent on either specifically hating on a) my arguments, or gaslighting them, or b)feminism as a whole in general.
Also, learn to spell if you're going to bother posting in SD. The rest of the forum will thank you.
