Lelouch24 Posts

[font=verdana][color=green]So, are you saying that without capital punishment, the level of proof required to find the defendant guilty is lower? That's a highly sketchy and rather idealistic approach there.

[font=verdana][color=green]As long as two people exist in the world, there will always be conflict, no matter how big or small.

Well, I was thinking of it in the first place but it was actually her who brought up the idea. So I went out to buy a ton of ice cream and soda and just watched movies for a few hours.

If she was expecting me to make a move on her while she was sleeping though, I'd probably be labelled a wuss for not doing so :(

UPDATE: So, it's Sunday morning over here, and last night we were watching some BluRays on the sofa when both of us started dozing off. About three in the morning I woke up for a glass of water and then carried her upstairs and tucked her into her bed. Afterwards I fell asleep back on the sofa again.

Am I doing the right thing.. or is she expecting me to do something??

Well I can rein myself in of course.. but I just don't understand her way of thinking that's all.

Already spent one night at her house and nothing worth mentioning has happened so far... times like these I really wonder what she's up to :(

Elaine: I only date clean guys. If you can prove that you're clean then I'll date you
Me: How can I prove that?
Elaine: That's up to you :)

She invited me to stay at her house for the weekend.

I'm probably going to end up banging her

VANILLA ENDING FOR THE WIN! I am jealous.

"Homeopathy: what does the "best" evidence tell us?"Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

After reviewing the Cochrane Database of systematic reviews, it was concluded that the effects of homeopathy couldn't at all be determined to be anymore than placebo in effectiveness.

Oh, and James Randi did a nice fun trick in the beginning of his speeches all the time where he'd down and entire bottle of homeopathic sleeping pills and nothing would ever happen.

Kinda fun, check it out:

...I'm not contradicting my beliefs at all. The FDA relies on studies vetted by scientists to determine what is good for you and what is not. I'm saying that's my standard of evidence at least in order to decide the drugs people ought to be allowed to use.

I'm not pro people being able to treat their kids 'however they want'. IF you think prayer will help when it's been shown to not, and you'd rather pray than go to a hospital, then screw you, you don't get to choose. IF you think homeopathy will help when it's never been shown to be anything more than a complimentary treatment that can be easily compared to a mere placebo effect? Screw you, you don't get to choose.

And when you say, "I should be able to choose because it helped my sister" (which you don't know really) I don't care, because that's not the standard of evidence I'm using. It's not hypocrisy...it's being consistent with my own standards.

screw you

Mm, no you weren't. You were talking about immigration reform policy, because that's the exact part of my post where I was talking about immigration reform policy, and you responded with "They've been trying to compromise it for years."

They've been trying to "compromise" it for years, it hasn't worked. this is because the system is fundamentally flawed, which is why alot of these programs should be gone

And besides, if we ARE talking about public welfare programs, if you consider something to be fundamentally flawed if it's fallible...then congratulations. Everything in existence is fundamentally flawed. You've stated nothing.

So then what's the problem? Because natural born citizens end up doing that too. This is not a problem with the immigrants.

Nope. Program's flawed because of how easy it is to obtain benefits, and how much benefits one receives when their application is accepted.

Oh yes, me not letting personal anecdotal evidence serve as a method for allowing drugs or medical methods to be used because I have contradicting evidence that is actually scientific and statistically significant is hypocrisy.

I have a sneaking suspicion you don't know what that word means.

So you agree that he's...you...agree that he's...trying...to....ngh...my head...f...FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

I don't care about your 'experience'

I'm not letting you pick inefficient and harmful methods of healing to heal your family members and yourself. I care too much about people to let that happen.

*groans and rubs eyebrows* Lemme guess...another conspiracy theory?

Of course I believe there's too much money spent on public welfare programs and whatnot. However unlike some people I don't think that this means we should outright get rid of it. It's a flawed system, this is to be expected with...ANY human made system. The goal shouldn't be, "If there are problems, abolish it." the goal should be, "IF there are problems, compromise to come to the best conclusion." And fucktards like Ron Paul are the types of people to go, "Screw it! Out with the whole thing!"

No you didn't, because you also made it sound like the illegal immigrants were coming over, giving nothing to society

...and leeching off society's hospitality...which you showed isn't the case. So congrats, you've refuted yourself. I have no problem with the parents getting taxpayer benefits if they...pay taxes.