LustfulAngel Posts

Savanna Game=Something of a Mirai Nikki Feel to it? It depends on the plot, character development and of course they should add a yandere for good measure. I don't want a carbon copy, obviously, but make it as epic as possible.

Minami-Ke fourth season: I haven't seen the series as a whole, period. Yuri fans, is it good?

I'm not sure if I've posted on here or not(I know there was a pic thread, but this is different.) I am a 20 year old, narcotic, self-proclaimed genius :D. Just finishing up my first year, in a three year online college program. I first found Fakku about a year ago, registered and here I am. I love fapping to Yandere the most, but without that Vanilla has grown very dear to my heart. Yuri is also up there. Oppai/Incest are also FTW, Ecchan :D. Great choices.

I'm not so keen on guro though, ntr or anything to do with the violation of the human body. It depends on how well they can romanticize it. Kinks, forbidden fetishes are only as hot as the kink in it. I suppose I can take a little blood, for example if it's a scene where your kissing your partners lips with your blood. That's always been a kink in human history. Its like a soul-connection or something.

But other than romanticism, keep me outta the gross stuff.

As Lelouch said, this can't be happening: I agree with you :D. Labels, stereotypes, etc do not tell the fabric of a person and therefore, I at least frown down upon them. And people making assumptions based off a vague position or a personality statement, etc is just silly. Precisely because they don't have precise definitions.

To answer the question, I'd rather know all of the details, including the ugly of a potential partner I'm with. If there's a girl I like, and it turns out she's a kinkster, that'll please me in more ways than one.

But if a girl posts an ad purporting kinkism and then has a very conservative, no-nonsense approach to the bed and life, it's like buying an item: Ya got ripped off.

So yeah, Biglundi this is FTW. Excellent Post.

If it gets to that point, Gooddell either needs to step down, or be helped down Mubarak/Gaddafi style.

Well, those are indeed the facts and from a neutral standpoint, that is true. It's just a sad situation :(.

For those who don't know, after successfully killing the former emperor Charles Di Britannia, Lelouch Vi Britannia took over the Britannian Empire, destroying the culture of Britannia, pulling a coup de-tat over the UFN(United Federation of Nations), and then successfully acquired the power of nuclear weapons(Damocles) over the entire world, declaring a true world dictatorship.

He then imprisoned those who went against the regime, and for a moment it looked like Lelouch, who once espoused the philosophies of freedom and the future, was going to lean towards Hitlerism. But then, something awe-inspiring happened.

He had his best friend, Suzaku play the part of Zero as he had a sword ran through him. Lelouch purposefully became the image of all that was evil incarnate, while building up zer0 as the messiah. This allowed the world to work towards the future and peace.

So I pose the question to everyone: Could the Zero Requiem work in real life? Could a leader become the symbolism of all that is evil, and lead to humanity rejecting said evils?

Well, the first two parts(becoming a symbol of evil) and a staged suicide would be easy to accomplish. The hard part is the aftermath, the people leaning towards the future.

IRL, we're just too opinionated(Religiously, etc) and somewhat bigoted in our own thoughts. Even if someone played the role of martyr, it wouldn't lead to anymore than at best "remembering him"(See:Martin Luther King Jr.)

So sadly, the Zero Requiem wouldn't work in my opinion.

It was clearly pronounced during Yui's explanation that at one point, she assisted those with negative emotions. The Cardinal System then told Yui she was effectively useless and had her on perm standby. Now the one time where Yui is free from this system, and uses her powers to protect those she loves, she gets ripped off.

If it's not fair to flip Kayaba the bird(Kirito did), then I'll flip the cardinal system the bird. Far from perfect, if you ask me.

His system jerked around with the program who was assigned to a task and couldn't complete it. And ontop of it all, to actually delete that program? Kayaba's a Troll.

If Episode 11 was cute, then Episode 12 was tragic

As this series so eloquently displays(even though I'm a big time Light fan and I believe what he did was and is justice.

If I'm to answer, then I would do as Light did. My 'evil' is for the sake of the world. I'm willing to discard morals and in fact, I think morals don't even exist. We Humans created morals for the sake of feeling better about ourselves. In reality, we'll discard these rules, regulations and thoughts for our own pleasures.

1)Golden Queen Galaxia(Sailor Moon)
2)Gasai Yuno(Mirai Nikki)
3)Kagome(Inuyasha)
4)Saito Himea(Itsuka Tenma no Kuro Usagi)
5)Ryofu Housen(Ikki Tousen)
6)Unchou Kanu(Ikki Tousen)
7)Yoruichi(Bleach)
8)Fate-Chan(Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha)
9)Chikane(Kannazuki No Miko)
10)Kikyo(Inuyasha)

You did the right thing, better safe than sorry and if he's any grateful, he'll worship your ass for saving him from the 8 X 4 Cube box otherwise known as a prison cell lol.

It used to be the most degenerate place on earth to live, but now with cable, gymnastics and what not, it's more equipped than say most well-done middle class homes **grumble, grumble. And our politicians say we're under
heavy duress. Yeah, because of wasteful spending like that**

I would argue our interbreeding is what allows for genetic diversification in the first place and if the social racial theories of the 30's had won out, said stagnation and isolation would have taken place.

Just because Humans can visit other countries and make love with other Humans, doesn't mean geographic isolation doesn't exist. What you meant to say, is that it doesn't impact us as much as say the animal kingdom.

However, I have to contend that races in fact, exist. Whether they be religiously based(IE: The Middle east) or culturally based(Everyone else), each race has it's own set of rules, regulations and ideas for how they want to live their lives. Which is why you had the racial wars to begin with, the idea of putting two separate civilizations together, ignoring their civil personification is something of retarded idiocy.


Real Equality, will come from the recognition of the personification of all of the various Peoples of the world, and allowing for either unity or separation as those civilizations see fit. Basically, drop the 'one glove fits all' approach, it doesn't work in our world as much as it doesn't in the Animal World.

Yami so looks like Fate from Nanoha. Off-topic but from what anime series does she come from and is she as epic as Fate-chan?

The Onee-san. It feels good to be the younger partner, to be led and to give up control.

Episode 11

No offense, but you guys are kinda going about this all wrong. It's a Wedding Anniversary, in other words, it brings back memories to the day where both of you tied the knot and gave yourselves the ultimate commitment. It's like your birthday, but oh so much more meaningful. If you're going to go the Simple Gift Route, the Simple Gift should still be symbolic to your lover. Me, personally? It's a special day with special meaning. So I'd do something extravagant. Take her to the beach for instance, movies, etc. Just something to remind her, that you are her's and only her's. That you'll give her your undivided attention.

You're right that all people have that primal desire, I myself acknowledge my own primal desires(Hence, the 'lustful' part of my name). However, while we humans have those primal desires, there's the need to keep them repressed. These desires are usually self-destructive, if not self-serving in nature and their best element is universally in romanticism.

Sex is the highest commitment of love, it is not a separate component. To separate sex from love, would then thereby be to 'love' the body, but not the persona of the person you're sleeping with.



This is what dating is for, this is what getting to know a person is for. And after going through that phase, the couple can talk about what would pleasure them as individuals. It's not about 'seeing enough', if you don't mind me using a male as a metaphor here. I actually don't want to 'sample' the female population.

My significant other is not a food, she is not an item. The only 'item', using the word in a romantic sense, is when the couple make that connection. That independence has another word or meaning: "Lack of commitment." I cannot seriously look at a prospective partner, who doesn't have that commitment to herself, who doesn't look at it seriously.

If a woman approaches me, and if she piques my curiosity and I return it in kind, the very least I expect, is that she's serious about it. That, if things don't work out it's not because she's 'bored with me'(I haven't really dated anyone, but if I could think of the worst reason to be turned down, it would be this.)



We can only hope such a woman is prepared for the various economic and social responsibilities from such recklessness, as you and I have discussed about. To me, a woman doesn't have to take such self-destructive social and personal risk, just to find the 'feeling' for companionship.

Actually, from my standpoint: These feelings of physical pleasure actually propel me to want a serious relationship, because then me and my hypothetical lover could love each other all the time. Casually, I could feel good this one time and emotionally I'd feel shitty after it was over.

I still maintain, the Sanger school of thought is actually anti-feminist in nature, her anti-social, anti-human diatribe has actually killed feminine development. The only thing it leaves, is a self-destructive, self-serving sense of 'pleasure' that leaves no future for the victim who tragically follows this line of 'thought'

Nope, but it makes the probability that much more likely. Our philosophies are tied to our actions, and what we do is a large part of what we believe in. Perhaps, the person who engages in casual sex might have found love in his/her new partner, but the moment things go sour, the temptation is there and will occur.

Jerry Springer and the divorce rates attest to it. Casual Sex devalues the male, the female and life in general.

It has no baring on them as a person, it has a bearing on them as a possible relationship partner, for any male(and vice-versa for the female), for the person who doesn't wanna get shat on later on in the relationship lol.

Hold no meaning in love, and there won't be meaning. Why is that a hard concept to grasp?