mibuchiha Posts
I just can't respect Anon.
The fact that the person who wrote:
probably looked like the guy in the pic above ruins the whole thing for me.
The fact that the person who wrote:
"Anonymous is void of human restraints, such as pity and mercy. Those who perform reckless actions or oppose Anonymous will be eliminated. Failure is not tolerated. Enemies are to be dealt with swiftly and efficiently. Anonymous must work as one. No single Anonymous knows everything. Anonymous is everyone and no one. You are. I am. Everyone is. Anonymous is humanity when the gloves come off."
probably looked like the guy in the pic above ruins the whole thing for me.
"I wish I was as cool as Anon" - So, you want to be as cool as a retarded person who can't even wipe his own ass? Good luck with that.
That whole "Scientology is going down!" thing was so horrible. A bunch of nerds on the internet actually thought they could destroy a fucking pseudo-religion? Ugh.
That whole "Scientology is going down!" thing was so horrible. A bunch of nerds on the internet actually thought they could destroy a fucking pseudo-religion? Ugh.
La_Mangouste wrote...
Argh, and I was hopping this kind of thread wouldn't appear on fakku. It's the beginning of the end.What do you mean? Are you against people discussing gun ownership?
HiroyukiShota wrote...
not another code geass thread.... *face palm*Because this section is littered with them, right?
Anyways, I think Lamz0r hit it right on the money. I highly doubt she learned about it any way other than figuring it out herself.
All I know is, I'm not going to go through a big list of who owns what girl before selecting my avatar. If I want Sayla from Gundam as my avatar, I'm not going to bother seeing who claimed her first.
"What are you pressing SELECT for? You don't have time to make a profile! Bitch, zombie's in the room! His axe is on fire! He killed your parents! Shoot him in the head! SHOOT HIM IN THE HEAD!"
Sorry for the double post, but this hasn't been touched by months.
Waxwork (1988)
First off, I only watched this movie so I could watch Waxwork 2, which has Bruce Campbell in it. That said, I wasn't disappointed, but I wasn't expecting much to begin with.
The plot doesn't make sense at any point in the movie, but it doesn't matter. Guy owns a wax museum with gruesome attractions, gets teenagers to visit it after dark, they go into scenes, die, and become new pieces. Because of this, the movie almost works like a series of vignettes with an overarching story. Unfortunately, there are only a few vignettes before the main story takes over, which isn't that bad, but it's not as good as the stories that take place in the wax worlds, or whatever they are.
The gore is decent throughout the movie, but there's not enough of it, except in one scene that involves vampires. Blood is every-fucking-where, and it is amazing. However, that too is over far too soon.
I can't say this is a great movie or a bad movie. It's not as boring as the typical slasher, but it doesn't make for a good paranormal movie either, as all the paranormal stuff makes little sense and seems to be tacked on just to explain some things. I guess, it's a movie based around an idea - kill people by throwing them in different scenarios. And it works. You get to see a werewolf, a mummy, vampires, and zombies, all in the same movie. But the story is silly, and the last ten minutes or so are pretty boring, despite a big fight scene.
6/10
I hope Waxwork 2 is better. It should be, it has the king himself!
Waxwork (1988)
First off, I only watched this movie so I could watch Waxwork 2, which has Bruce Campbell in it. That said, I wasn't disappointed, but I wasn't expecting much to begin with.
The plot doesn't make sense at any point in the movie, but it doesn't matter. Guy owns a wax museum with gruesome attractions, gets teenagers to visit it after dark, they go into scenes, die, and become new pieces. Because of this, the movie almost works like a series of vignettes with an overarching story. Unfortunately, there are only a few vignettes before the main story takes over, which isn't that bad, but it's not as good as the stories that take place in the wax worlds, or whatever they are.
The gore is decent throughout the movie, but there's not enough of it, except in one scene that involves vampires. Blood is every-fucking-where, and it is amazing. However, that too is over far too soon.
I can't say this is a great movie or a bad movie. It's not as boring as the typical slasher, but it doesn't make for a good paranormal movie either, as all the paranormal stuff makes little sense and seems to be tacked on just to explain some things. I guess, it's a movie based around an idea - kill people by throwing them in different scenarios. And it works. You get to see a werewolf, a mummy, vampires, and zombies, all in the same movie. But the story is silly, and the last ten minutes or so are pretty boring, despite a big fight scene.
6/10
I hope Waxwork 2 is better. It should be, it has the king himself!
Kurobushi wrote...
Where did these WOULD YOU FUCK HER start, these threads should all go into incoherent babbling and these past few days the random forum is being filled with these. The random section is starting to lose its "random" touch.It'll end soon. Same thing happened with dick/cum threads and zombie threads.
Fuck a FFVII remake; they should make Final Fantasy 1-6 in 3D. A lot of people are never try them because of the graphics, and that's a shame.
Been rejected too many times to keep count, directly and indirectly. :lol:
There was one incident with a chick from an anime girl I went to. She seemed to like me, too, so one day, I told her that I liked her, and she just said, "Ah, thanks," like I had said I liked her shoes or something. That was weird. But she was kind of weird. Whenever anything romantic or sexual came up, she acted like she didn't hear or see it. I guess she was repressed.
There was one incident with a chick from an anime girl I went to. She seemed to like me, too, so one day, I told her that I liked her, and she just said, "Ah, thanks," like I had said I liked her shoes or something. That was weird. But she was kind of weird. Whenever anything romantic or sexual came up, she acted like she didn't hear or see it. I guess she was repressed.
I got their first album when it came out and loved it. Got the second album a few months after it came out and loved it. Haven't bothered with the third album. Nothing really against them, just haven't felt like it.
I need to get it though. Can never have too much music.
I need to get it though. Can never have too much music.
I'm not against gun ownership; I believe they can come in handy. But the whole thing about "we need guns to protect us from the government" is a bunch of bull. Maybe if we weren't talking about the US, it might be different. I can understand every citizen in England having a gun and thinking they could fight against the government if it became corrupt, but . . . actually, that makes me wonder: Why doesn't every other country in the world believe that citizens should own weapons in case the government goes crazy? Why aren't French people or Germans afraid that their governments will run amok and take complete control of their lives?
About the thing with "evil," I only meant that if the government did something that would make the majority of citizens want to rebel, like suddenly declare that Christianity was the only right religion and all non-Christians were to be terminated or put into camps, that would show that the government was incredibly fucked-up and thus willing to do whatever was needed to gain control of its citizens. The government wouldn't make crazy demands and then let the citizens walk all over it; it would have simply not made the demands in the first place. In short, if President Obama said, "All Hispanics must die," and was willing to go through with it, what would stop him from treating dissidents like shit and killing them willy-nilly? What would stop him from dropping a nuclear bomb on a city just to shut the citizens up?
About the thing with "evil," I only meant that if the government did something that would make the majority of citizens want to rebel, like suddenly declare that Christianity was the only right religion and all non-Christians were to be terminated or put into camps, that would show that the government was incredibly fucked-up and thus willing to do whatever was needed to gain control of its citizens. The government wouldn't make crazy demands and then let the citizens walk all over it; it would have simply not made the demands in the first place. In short, if President Obama said, "All Hispanics must die," and was willing to go through with it, what would stop him from treating dissidents like shit and killing them willy-nilly? What would stop him from dropping a nuclear bomb on a city just to shut the citizens up?
kamillebidan wrote...
not really.depends on the object. If s/he likes/don't mind to be bullied, then why not? as long we have fun together by bullying someone...
but if s/he doesn;t like to be bullied, then we shouldn't do it...
What person likes to be bullied?
The Wikipedia page has a bit more info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_Ball_Online
I would love to play this game, but I have a feeling I never will. I hope it gets really popular and is brought to America soon (and that by then, I can afford a good computer and can actually play the game).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_Ball_Online
I would love to play this game, but I have a feeling I never will. I hope it gets really popular and is brought to America soon (and that by then, I can afford a good computer and can actually play the game).
GinIchimaru_09 wrote...
ShaggyJebus wrote...
The thing is, if the US suddenly started acting like Iran, all the guns people keep in their parlors wouldn't change a thing. The US military is fucking huge and is not to be messed with.Yeah maybe but bowing down and taking it up the ass isn't exactly the way I would want to go. As for taking on the U.S military look at the Viet Cong they beat us. Small forces armed with small arms can stall or even halt large military forces. Now could a militia beat an army in full out combat no, but you don’t need to fight fair. Small forces have proven time and time again that they can dish out serious power. As for tanks that is what RPG’s and IED’s are designed to take out. If you need an example look at the IRA they beat the British military down till they gave in if that’s not example enough I don’t know what is.
In Vietnam, we were fighting in a small space with a lot of jungle. The Viet Cong knew the area and knew how to take advantage of it. Also, a lot of the soldiers were young and inexperienced, not really the cream of the crop. Now, we have a lot more weapons, the soliders are better, and in the US, there is a ton of space.
The way I see it, if the government decided to take a U-turn and become totally evil, they wouldn't hold back in any respects. They could drop a nuclear bomb on New York City, just to show that they could. How could regular citizens fight nuclear bombs or missiles or soldiers in full armor?
Furthermore, a lot of citizens are simple and don't want to fight. Even a lot of people who own guns know nothing of actual warfare. The average American citizen is too cozy to fight back and win.