Rbz Posts
Haha, I just bought it.
What I find weird is how everyone talks about how you die and shit, but no one mentions what powers you get or other shit, that you could use to keep yourself from dying. There are different classes, but I've been disappointed that no one mentioned the skills you could have.
I can't play it today though. Lame.
What I find weird is how everyone talks about how you die and shit, but no one mentions what powers you get or other shit, that you could use to keep yourself from dying. There are different classes, but I've been disappointed that no one mentioned the skills you could have.
I can't play it today though. Lame.
softbanker wrote...
That's a long wall of text about faggots geez I didn't even bother reading about what the hell is about coz I really am not interested to make arguments about facts about some damn homos. I just said it isn't normal that is all, then someone replied so I replied and so on.@ Mrprinnybomb again you dumb dumb dumbass Do I sound like I wanna argue about homos? I am not making an argument coz I am not presenting some worthless infos about faggs and I am not asking of what do you have to say about my point. I said what I think that is all.
Hey caveman, I didn't think you were that much of a fucking bigot. It's funny how you call people dumb when you obviously have the least intelligence of the group. Oh my, this reply now has more than three sentences, I hope you can keep up. Also, it's funny how you just ignore other people's counter arguments and act superior.
tl;dr You're a vile bigot, caveman.
g-money wrote...
but satire can only go so far.Not satire at all. Those two threads just happened to be that way and that's how I got the idea for this thread. I'm not bagging on Krystel or anything, just an innocent question about the sagginess of your balls..
The rich.
Countless times I have imagined myself as a wealthy person sitting around the house relaxing, having no responsibilities, and playing video games.
Countless times I have imagined myself as a wealthy person sitting around the house relaxing, having no responsibilities, and playing video games.
Adder wrote...
An atheist is supposed to be able to supply proof that God does not exist.Atheism is simply a lack of belief in deities. We're not supposed to do shit.
Adder wrote...
An agnostic on the other hand just requires proof to be persuaded into believing in a God.What the fuck! If I don't believe in a god, you don't think proof will persuade me to have belief in a god? Are you purposely trying to make atheism sound irrational as if we close ourselves off to any evidence of a god? There just is no evidence, deal with it.

Would you start acting wise? Would you sit at the chess table with the rest of us old fags? Would you stay on the toiler just to have the water cool off your saggy nut-sack?
What old faggy shit would you do?
Punch myself in the nuts.
One of the worst things I can do to myself. That power will be well deserved.
One of the worst things I can do to myself. That power will be well deserved.
Since I like the number 7, I'll give my top 7 (with a sample):
1 - Ishikei (a.k.a. Nise Midi Doronokai) <- YOU DON'T MESS WITH THIS GUY!
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
2 - Kisaragi Gunma <- His works will never get old, shit, I'm still not tired of Giri Giri Sisters.
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
3 - Saegusa Kohaku <- Draws some of the hottest fucking ever.
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
4 - Bosshi <- Nothing like some bosshi to help you pop a boner
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
5 - Tony Taka <- My only criticism is that there isn't enough fucking.
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
6 - Takayaki <- Has some of the cutest drawings ever
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
7 - Otono Natsu <- Delicious titties (and art, of course).
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
1 - Ishikei (a.k.a. Nise Midi Doronokai) <- YOU DON'T MESS WITH THIS GUY!
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
Spoiler:
2 - Kisaragi Gunma <- His works will never get old, shit, I'm still not tired of Giri Giri Sisters.
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
Spoiler:
3 - Saegusa Kohaku <- Draws some of the hottest fucking ever.
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
Spoiler:
4 - Bosshi <- Nothing like some bosshi to help you pop a boner
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
Spoiler:
5 - Tony Taka <- My only criticism is that there isn't enough fucking.
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
Spoiler:
6 - Takayaki <- Has some of the cutest drawings ever
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
Spoiler:
7 - Otono Natsu <- Delicious titties (and art, of course).
[color=darkblue]Sample:[/color]
Spoiler:
Adder wrote...
First off, I am going to say that any reference to special pleading or straw men are, in themselves, straw men. Based off of the definition that a straw man is something irrelevant that makes it seem one has won an argument, mentioning it in an argument is itself a straw man.Haha, did you even read the examples of a strawman fallacy? Here, I'll fetch them for you:
Spoiler:
And guess what, you're guilty of 1 and 5. Also, pointing out your logical fallacies is completely relevant to the discussion. Are you shitting me? Pointing out flaws in the opponent's logic, irrelevant? Niggah, please.
Adder wrote...
Based off of step one I know I exist, but also based off of the argument, I know that I am doubting everything I see. In other words, the vat, the liquid, even the brain...It could all be a lie.Lol, then how do you exist? What's even more hilarious is that dismissing the vat as just a lie would contradict the stupid esse argument which says, and I quote:
Stupid esse argument wrote...
Suppose for a moment that you are not really a human being with an actual body. In reality, you are nothing more than a brain floating in a vat of fluids, with electrodes attached to various parts of your exterior that allow evil scientists to manipulate you into thinking that what you perceive is actually there, when in fact it is nothing more than an imaginary world constructed by the scientists.Adder wrote...
If I doubt the existence of others, and they die, why should I believe in the condition of death?Because you exist and you're not infinite.
Adder wrote...
If I am existing, and have been existing since the start of whenever it was that I started existing- what is there to make me believe that this existence will end?Nor do you have any proof that your existence will not end. Dude, the argument only works with propositions that are conclusive. Not 50%, not 99%, but 100%.
Adder wrote...
After all- the only things that can be proved to exist in this stage are self and esse.Even if I grant you that inconclusive proposition that you can't not exist, then that still leaves the problem of that stupid esse being treated differently from the other entity. Teh argument is null!
Stupid fucking writing wrote...
entropyI got one question for these assholes: How the fuck do you know that the universe is a CLOSED SYSTEM!?
BigLundi wrote...
Serial killers would run amok killing whoever whenever and tell EVERYONE they did it...and who's gonna say he can't? Without religion we can't TELL him, "You can't do that." We can't shake our fingers at anyone and say, "You're being a bad person." because without religion there's no such thing as bad people.Lol, he thinks that we need religion to know that murder is not really a good thing (especially to a society, and the world is filled with them). Seriously bro, you don't think that without religion, people would say, "We can't have murder because that would be detrimental to society, therefore we must outlaw it."
teoretikern wrote...
well how do we decide wich one who won then?If you're intelligent enough to follow the argument and understand the points put forth by the debaters, then you should be smart enough to know which one has the better argument. Whoever you side with, after evaluating their arguments, is in your opinion, the winner.
Adder wrote...
However, everything you perceive is false, correct? Then your perception of death, even your perception of time, is false.First of all, death can't be perceived, since you'll have nothing to perceive it with. Second of all, it's not "everything you perceive false"(which is a strawman), it's everything that can be doubted will be treated as false. If you're dead, you can't doubt, which makes the esse argument meaningless.
A brain that is already existing in a vat without a body has no means of dieing or its existence coming to an end.
That is an inconclusive assumption and has no place in this argument. How would you know that something won't go wrong and the brain malfunctions because one of the wires fucks up? You don't. Since it isn't indubitable, it doesn't help the argument.
That esse argument is null. Your special pleading just makes you look desperate.
More of the same: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/01/activisions-bobby-kotick-brings-cash-but-not-heart.ars
Ethil wrote...
Rbz wrote...
"You don't believe in dragons until one is munching on your ass." (paraphrasing)
True and not true, even if people are born atheist, they're many who are raised believers. You usually believe in a lot of things that you haven't seen and has no evidence of existance when you're a kid, like Santa or the Easter bunny for example. Then you grow up, and since you still haven't seen the real thing you start to belive the ones who says that they aren't real.
That's not the point. The point is that non-belief is the default. Doesn't matter what you were raised to believe.
I think that's a very curious point that TAA brings up. What if the roles were switched?
This lawsuit itself is disgusting. Can't get some coffee naked in the confines of your own home without some stupid bitch ruining everything for you and getting the cops involved.
Waar wrote...
no, and I told others who kept pushing keeping all 5 to stop bringing it up. I'm not going to change my mind on this; a reset will happen.(insert minus rep here)
Or at least that's how it would've went down. Hahah
Spoiler:






