Tsujoi Posts
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
I'm digging that Fubuki avi.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
To be honest, I don't think she's going to say yes, so anything I could say about "reevaluate this, or be concerned, get tested, blah bladdity blah blah" is mostly meaningless (unless she secretly really digs you and has been totally honest this whole time). From your story it seems like you were super horny and lonely so you paid her for sex, and afterwards you grew attached because you both share superficial interest. You then told her to stop working and be be a couple without even dating (you really don't sound like you know her all that well).
I know this is Random (probably LR&R later) and you're putting yourself out here because you're genuinely stumped, but...You're stupid.
I know this is Random (probably LR&R later) and you're putting yourself out here because you're genuinely stumped, but...You're stupid.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Ryuuuuuuuu stuck in a bug.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Congrats.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Duck Duck Go is another alternative that respects your privacy, I guess.
I don't use google search for that kinda stuff, unless I'm using reverse search trying to find sauce. Most porn sites have in site search functions.
I don't use google search for that kinda stuff, unless I'm using reverse search trying to find sauce. Most porn sites have in site search functions.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Sweet Rolls wrote...
cruz737 wrote...
Sweet Rolls wrote...
cruz737 wrote...
Well considering how a small amount of all deaths are gun related (even less from rampages), while a lot more crimes are deterred/prevented because of guns... I wouldn't call them uncaring.Small amount? In 2013, 2/3rds of all homicides were indeed from gun related violence. I wouldn't call that a "small amount".
cruz737 wrote...
What "revaluations" do you think the 2nd amendment needs when there's already vastly different laws regarding gun rights from state to state?Revaluation was a poor word choice on my end. Evaluation like winged said is what I needed to say. Sorry.
Small amount as in it's less than 1% of 1% of all deaths. Guns arguably (almost without a doubt) do more good than bad.
And again what evaluations are needed? Almost anything that can be said and done about gun control/rights has been said and done.
And exactly what have been done? To my knowledge the only thing you need to do is fill out a paper and the only background check that is being done is criminal charges. Where's the doc say so in this?
Are you suggesting that every single state has the same gun laws?
And if we assume that's true for even a second, does tightening up restrictions (or even attempting to outright ban all guns) automatically make a place more safe?
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Sweet Rolls wrote...
cruz737 wrote...
Well considering how a small amount of all deaths are gun related (even less from rampages), while a lot more crimes are deterred/prevented because of guns... I wouldn't call them uncaring.Small amount? In 2013, 2/3rds of all homicides were indeed from gun related violence. I wouldn't call that a "small amount".
cruz737 wrote...
What "revaluations" do you think the 2nd amendment needs when there's already vastly different laws regarding gun rights from state to state?Revaluation was a poor word choice on my end. Evaluation like winged said is what I needed to say. Sorry.
Small amount as in it's less than 1% of 1% of all deaths. Guns arguably (almost without a doubt) do more good than bad.
And again what evaluations are needed? Almost anything that can be said and done about gun control/rights has been said and done.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
I feel bad for people genuinely hyped for fallout 4.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
NEVER.
At least till I get another one.
At least till I get another one.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Still has Not Tomoko with a tiger fur as an avatar.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Sweet Rolls wrote...
Winged-Fapper wrote...
Last gun store in San Fran closed it's doors. If they had guns they could have shot the sick fuck before he could even start his rampage. Politics give me a headache...Republicans just don't give a damn thats all. 2nd amendment needs some serious revaluation because people here are dying left and right for no reason.
Well considering how a small amount of all deaths are gun related (even less from rampages), while a lot more crimes are deterred/prevented because of guns... I wouldn't call them uncaring.
What "revaluations" do you think the 2nd amendment needs when there's already vastly different laws regarding gun rights from state to state?
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
I'm doing it ironically. :^3
It's never to late to be ready for the season.
It's never to late to be ready for the season.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
The Melf-est.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
IB truly is best section.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
solanin wrote...
Feminism is itself all about doubting and questioning societal constructs and norms when it comes to sex and gender. Aside from certain widely used understandings and established interpretations, there aren't really any feminist principles to doubt. There are arguments and viewpoints on certain social topics, but then not all feminists would agree on these things. They aren't some hivemind, even if some subsets act like they are (particularly the ones that come out of the internet). And then some are less reflexive and others more so. E.g. they’re people, it depends just like with every other grouping of people and school of thought. I'd argue actual academic feminists consider what their assumptions and foundations are more than most average people when making a claim about something. If feminists need to reconsider anything major they all usually agree on currently, it's their gender/sex framework. You know, the old gender is socially constructed m/f behaviours and ideas of masculinity/femininity and then sex is actual biology e.g. chromosomes, body shape, smexy parts.
Why does this need to be challenged?
It's simple really. It ignores and trivializes what transgender people go through.
I'm not saying the distinction is itself inherently wrong. It's done alot of good in helping us talk about what male and female really mean and how they figure into our social environment. The problem is when we limit out understanding of M/F to just these two definitions of sex and gender. Doing so ignores too much of what a transgender person actually goes through in relation to their gender identity and makes it just about matching their body with the socially normative yet constructed behaviours and roles they prefers. Some of feminism makes this even worse without intending to by saying the behaviours don't need to be normative nor match the body (implying there's no reason for trans people to actually change their sex). In other words, it suggests being transgender is just a devient lifestyle/belief, and one that paradoxically leads to going against the norm out of a desire to allow one's behaviour to meet with norms (by matching this behaviour to the "correct" sex, instead of matching one's behaviour to their birth sex). Yep, the crippling and isolating internal struggle I've experienced continually since before puberty is just a lifestyle choice...
My inability to ever feel emotionally present in my body was just me struggling with socially constructed gender norms and body issues, and now my decision to actually take steps towards transition, well that's just me feeling like I need to match my sex with the gendered behaviours I like for whatever reason, even though the association of these behaviours with one sex is entirely arbitrary. Yep..
I can go into more detail about what it's really like if anyone's interested. I actually did in the original version of this post that went unposted, but I felt this version fits better at the moment. I get that it's hard for people to really understand what we go through so. Not that I can speak for the experience of all transgender people. Anyway, I know the standard feminist gender/sex definitions definetly do not work in regards to trans issues. They're still useful for somethings but a compromise needs to be made on both ends. Maybe a new language, or just recognition that the word gender is not rigidly bound to a single school of thought's understanding of it.
(I know, I take serious discussion way too serious)
You bring up some valid concerns(especially about some of their views towards trans) and I also agree they're not a hivemind but far too often do I see moderate and radical feminist say and do things that are removed from reality and really off putting. (honestly it's not even "extremist" kill all men type who are dominant when it comes to ridiculous tactics) I think the amount of women or people in general who consider themselves to be feminist has dropped slightly over the years, going from 20%~ to ~18%.
The thing about transpeople is that in some regards their existence undermines feminist talking points about gender and social constructs.(Female/male brains and mannerisms, I honestly do not know enough about the neurology and biology behind the counter point but it shows we're definitely not the same and the way we identify are not social constructs)
To be honest I feel like a lot are just deaf to others concerns. Whether it be men, trans, those of other races and even other women themselves.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
>shrimp pho
Why?
Why?
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Iamnotchrishansen wrote...
cruz737 wrote...
Good thing I didn't go there. College guy going on all these violence sprees need to get laid.
Then they'd be Jack the Rippers :v
Doesn't Kadushy go there, too?
He lives in the city iirc.
Also maybe but probably not.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
General Mills cereal.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
Good thing I didn't go there.
College guy going on all these violence sprees need to get laid.
College guy going on all these violence sprees need to get laid.
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion