[Locked] Lack of a Civil (But Not Uptight) Subforum

I don't know about you guys, but I am tend to be equally comediac and serious.

So when I go to the Serious Discussion subforum, I get thrown out (and even banned on one occasion) because:

"Pffa, Pffa. We won't let a fellow crack even a single joke; even when they are being serious in the rest of their post."

And when I go to --or, more accurately, when my topics are moved to-- the Incoherent Babbling subforum, I get booted out because:

"D00d ur stupid!!1!! i h8 u, go die nao [INSERT PEJORATIVE HERE]!"

———————

Why isn't there a subforum (save for, I suppose, the Random subforum) that one can have a civil discussion, but still be able to crack a few jokes?

Aww yeah, it's this guy again. I'm gonna enjoy it to the MAX.

Random is more serious than IB or less than SD.

So what you're really saying is:

Ox feces. I like you a lot. You always entertain me in the best way possible. Why should I hate you?

This.

I see no difference between:

"I am going to laugh at your misfortune, but don't blame me I am doing it for the lulz."

and

"I don't really like you."

Oh please. I never scorn at your actions. In fact, I keep on urging you to post more. And don't be mistaken; I am by no means is laughing at your misfortune. I am laughing at your indifference and your incompetence to comprehend things here. Of course, it doesn't mean that I want you to stop. I can't make one of my best source of amusement gone, can I?

I don't need "Look at the funny man, Mommy!" supporters. That's simply malice.


And even though it might be easy for you to make posts on this forum without constant out-booting, it isn't for an extreme-views intellectual comediac fellow like myself.

Not everyone here hates you like people in IB, I guess in this case you're to blame.
I don't know what you posted to get a reaction like that, but it must have been something really stupid.

I just happen to be a person who is serious, comediac and has some extreme views (like being anti-California, for example.)

Well then there you go, SD coincidentally has a nature of not liking someone who oppose their point of view without any valid reason that is acceptable for their ears.

How am I supposed to please everybody? I gave valid reasons as to why I have that view, but I guess they wanted more...

Extreme views intellectual comedians. Pfft.

Okay, jokes aside, let me give one tiny little suggestion. You're looking for a civil, but not too uptight kind of subforum, correct? Basically, all subforum beside IB and SD fall under this category. That's why I said that you should look around the place some more.

Also, valid points of your judgment might not be so valid in other's view. The best thing is to show accurate data or statistic or any other viewable, legitimate piece of data. This is the most basic thing when you want to dwelve into an argument. Of course you know this, right? Since you're an extreme views-intellectual comedian person.

I understand that, but I generally am looking to speak about either philosophical discussions, or ranty complaints.

Okay. Now give me an example of things you wanted to discuss.

I do. Hence why I put, for example, "highest U.S. crime rates" as well as "has the 'merry, Mary, marry' merger" in my reasons.

But to no avail.

You can do that in random. If the replies are not entirely serious and have comical aspects to them, none of the moderators will put it in SD.

Especially Tegumi. She don't want that shitto in there.

Okaay. Give me the link for the respective post or thread so that I can really judge it. My judgement would be way too biased if I only know the situations based on your statement.