A new plea from another desperate soul.
0
devsonfire wrote...
Tegumi wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
She didn't go break the rules forty times hoping that she would be accepted here after doing so.Well, 20 or so times is still a large amount.
Although she did show self-restraint so I do suppose that counts for something.
Oh fuck I forgot she did try to do what Koko Loco did. My bad. But yeah, as you said, I guess.
She was the inventor of what Koko did, actually.
0
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Herodotus wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
Tegumi wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
She didn't go break the rules forty times hoping that she would be accepted here after doing so.Well, 20 or so times is still a large amount.
Although she did show self-restraint so I do suppose that counts for something.
Oh fuck I forgot she did try to do what Koko Loco did. My bad. But yeah, as you said, I guess.
She was the inventor of what Koko did, actually.
Not only koko implemented it...
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Dee::Arc wrote...
I also have to agree with gitaaa; the perma-ban seems to be losing it's edge).There is no such thing as a perma ban on Fakku, at least we've never really used it as other sites do, a deterrent to keep people from breaking rules. Multiple users have come back from "perma bans" and compared to other sites (sakurahana) it's more difficult to get banned in the first place. Before Tegumi and I showed up we only ever had 2-3 bans given out due to rule violations(ex:Chuu). As of now the only people who will never be given a chance to come back are probably hibia, tranquility and koko. The reason guys like zak or harm haven't been considered is that most of them have never asked for it.
cruz737 wrote...
Also call me slow but I just noticed an error in the thread title. Shouldn't it be, "Another plea from a desperate soul" or at least "A new plea from a desperate soul"?No, the title is fine. Both of your suggestions imply that it's probably koko making a new plea to return.
0
Personally, I dont care about the user much to warrant an opinion?
but isnt this like the third time she has/attempted to return?
I mean she went full retarded the first time. Got banned.
Showed up and was fine for a bit before going full retarded again. Banned again.
Then made all those alts...
It just seems like shes beating a dead horse. What reason does she have to want to come here so badly?
but isnt this like the third time she has/attempted to return?
I mean she went full retarded the first time. Got banned.
Showed up and was fine for a bit before going full retarded again. Banned again.
Then made all those alts...
It just seems like shes beating a dead horse. What reason does she have to want to come here so badly?
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
The part of this case that amuses me the most is that koko had this very option presented to her and Illumia seem to recognize the proper way to deal with the situation. Take your lumps and keep quiet, it could be 100% bullshit that Illumia has any repentance for her actions but as long as I don't see it come up again I'll be more than happy to let her come back. This could have been you koko.
0
Waar wrote...
The part of this case that amuses me the most is that koko had this very option presented to her and Illumia seem to recognize the proper way to deal with the situation. Take your lumps and keep quiet, it could be 100% bullshit that Illumia has any repentance for her actions but as long as I don't see it come up again I'll be more than happy to let her come back. This could have been you koko.The irony is killing me that it hurts and you shouldn't give her any ideas even if she isn't capable of pulling them off.
0
Well I remember alot of ban evasions threads that Illumia made.
But if she has really repented then I don't mind but if she goes full retard again swing that ban hammer?
But if she has really repented then I don't mind but if she goes full retard again swing that ban hammer?
0
Waar wrote...
There is no such thing as a perma ban on Fakku, at least we've never really used it as other sites do, a deterrent to keep people from breaking rules. Multiple users have come back from "perma bans" and compared to other sites (sakurahana) it's more difficult to get banned in the first place. Before Tegumi and I showed up we only ever had 2-3 bans given out due to rule violations(ex:Chuu). As of now the only people who will never be given a chance to come back are probably hibia, tranquility and koko. The reason guys like zak or harm haven't been considered is that most of them have never asked for it.I see. I guess I've not been here long enough to know about things like that; the only one I knew who had a perma-ban pardon was Longevity.
On another note, I was here during most of the Koko stuff, but I don't know anything about Hibia or Tranquility. It's fine if no one wants to, but could anyone give me a summery of them?
0
It sounds like she may have genuinely changed her ways and I think she should be given another chance. While it's true that there isn't a lot of reason in favour of her unban, there is the potential that she could become a contributing member of the community and I don't think that should be overlooked. Unlike Koko she's already shown that she's willing to change her ways, so that potential is probably pretty high.
She's looking for redemption and she did act immaturely, but it would also be immature of us to hold a grudge against her and not give her the chance to prove she can be a decent member of the community. Let her come back, give it some time and we'll see what happens, we don't stand to lose anything.
I don't really think it's fair to judge whether anyone should be let back into the community based on their own life choices. Everyone makes mistakes and It's really her business, she should be able to do what she wants in her life as along as it doesn't affect the community in a negative way.
She's looking for redemption and she did act immaturely, but it would also be immature of us to hold a grudge against her and not give her the chance to prove she can be a decent member of the community. Let her come back, give it some time and we'll see what happens, we don't stand to lose anything.
Tyranosaurus_Secks wrote...
Ah, you mean the whore that found going full retard on an internet porn forum to be more rewarding than trying to find a way out of the stripper business and be a proper mother to her daughter?I don't really think it's fair to judge whether anyone should be let back into the community based on their own life choices. Everyone makes mistakes and It's really her business, she should be able to do what she wants in her life as along as it doesn't affect the community in a negative way.
0
cruz737 wrote...
Oh, I don't remember the posting of b&able material but I do recall the ban evasions.Also call me slow but I just noticed an error in the thread title. Shouldn't it be, "Another plea from a desperate soul" or at least "A new plea from a desperate soul"?
"A plea from another desperate soul" sounds nice.
0
Gravity cat
the adequately amused
arpeggi wrote...
i have no idea why anyone would want to come back to this ceasepool of retardsYou have an account on here so you're part of that cesspool of retards. Just saiyan.
0
Cinia Pacifica
Ojou-sama Writer
Shotty Too Hotty wrote...
Waar wrote...
The part of this case that amuses me the most is that koko had this very option presented to her and Illumia seem to recognize the proper way to deal with the situation. Take your lumps and keep quiet, it could be 100% bullshit that Illumia has any repentance for her actions but as long as I don't see it come up again I'll be more than happy to let her come back. This could have been you koko.you shouldn't give her any ideas even if she isn't capable of pulling them off.
Does that even matter, though?
Because if she does get dumb ideas and later go full retard, Waar's mod powers will simply dominate her ass. Of course, that's one of the most entertaining shit that happens in IB rarely.