Is there a such thing as "too young"in lolicon.

1-2 years, basically infants

Yea, Some websites use the "toddler" tag, and that's really beyond something I can fap to. Even in hentai, to me, that's just completely fucked up.

Yeah, I'm not too keen on the toddler aged lolicon, but whatever floats your boat.

there are some artists where age is totally non-relavent, like the youngsters are closer to chibi than children, Inuboshi and Hoshino Fuuta for example. Those you'd really have to go out of your way to make them too young, because they wouldn't be younger in my perception, just smaller.




Then there's stuff with more realistic artwork, where you can see actual muscular/skeletal detail, Naoshi Onizuka or Juan Gotoh for example. For that kind, I'm cool with early adolescent, or just about to hit puberty, but noticeably younger than that gets to be unappealing.




And honestly, a lot of it has to do with the partner in question. The bigger the age discrepancy, the less tolerant I'll be of a younger loli.

No, there's no age limit but if you can realize, the girls never look like less than 8 years old and if it only remains on the drawing it's ok. Besides i noticed that in hentai they never tell you how old the girl really is.

Is there a such thing as "too old" in milf?

When it's too young it becomes totally different. As others' have said, Toddler.

I think the qualifications of a loli or shota is that it has to have a recognizable body structure. Not all bundled up like an infant, if that makes sense.

Yeah toddler is a good answer...

Getting into toddler territory is just wrong

Infant and toddler is a bit too young, but as sifian_ said it can depend on the art style.

Even if said girl is only 4, if it's drawn in a certain style it can still be a turn on for people.

There is never such thing as too young in lolicon. Not for me anyway.



If she is hot then excellent! If she is ugly then what is she doing in a hentai manga in the first place!?

good point, seconded!

Besides, age is ridiculously flexible in the 2-D world anyway.

This topic reminded me of something... I seriously loled when I first saw this pic... linking rather than appending because of the severely questionable nature of the image in question.

Do not follow this link if you are easily perturbed. It definitely falls into the category of "too young".
http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/20433/incest-izumi_konata-loli-lucky_star-raep-semen-sex

But hey, at least she's not crying.

I dont really think there's such thing as TOO YOUNG, its all in the artist's atyle if the character in question LOOKS extremely young and its "AWWWWWWWWRIIIIGGHHTTT!!!"

I dont really like that but if they dont really LOOK that you ng I dont really mind...

also sifian I lol @ that pic every time I see it...

Is it a good sign if I lol'd at the picture? Reminds me of a certain president from a certain country........

wat presidnet from wat country could that be hmm...?

Oh God I hate that guy.

Anyway..... the point is that age and gender are secondary factors. Unless of course the original poster is someone working for the government trying to convict us of being pedophiles by deliberately posting this topic.

In which case I am screwed.

Oh Rly...?

Wow dude that Animated gif is awesome... Any more?