Your Personal Thought Process on Furries\Anthros

Pages Prev12
0
Furries as a genre of fappable is fine. It just happens that I used to be a huge furry hater up until I rolled across Book of the Beast and Nezumi. Macross's reasoning resonates with me given that it has some thematic advantages.

As a subculture, it's. . . I don't know. It seems like stereotypical weabooness WITHOUT a baseline industry to back it with cool products. There's something both hideously pretentious and insipid about mixing My Little Pony/Winx Club fantasy with your identity that is absolute unattractive.
0
My supervisor in the military was a furry. Her entire life revolved around costumes and Pokemon. It was a little uncomfortable sometimes, but whatever gets you off I guess.
0
PumpJack McGee wrote...
First off, I'd like to inform you that you spelled 'Process" wrong. Doesn't lead one to take the thread very seriously when such mistakes are present in the title.

Anyways, I'm not blatantly against furries/anthros- but I'm not into them either. When the artwork is of high quality, or I happen across a particularly novel and original design- I can admire them in a purely aesthetic sense.

But as far as it being pornographic material- 'fraid that's one area that I won't venture into. Not by repulsion- but it simply doesn't appeal to me.

Girls with animalistic features (cat ears/tail, for example) are perfectly fine- but I like skin. Fur would just be bizarre. The girl must remain primarily human in features.

However- upon the opposite side of things- I'm actually fine with bestiality in a one-sided sense; girls getting fucked by animals.

Just the idea that a girl is just so damned horny that she'll get it on with anything with a dick, I guess. Never put much thought into the matter. Then again- when people are in that particularly amorous state of mind- I don't believe that they're very rational.

Animal instinct and all that.



You took the words out of my mouth sir.
Pages Prev12