Virgins

Couldnt care less one way or another, not like it really matters, especially as you get older and its less common. Less chance of things going wrong or awkward if they arent though, plus it can be painful for the girl first time, and the last thing I want a girl to feel during or after is '**** me, this hurts...'

I know you think people still say that . but here's a secret...



also what's more rewarding then being her first ? being her 2,3,4,5,6,7 etc.

Pop a virgin wrong, they will hate sex and men. Do it right her grand kids will hear about you. My view on virgins and me is i don't like giving pain to a person. Im a hopeless romantic. Im not going to go into the blood thing, people already think im a freak.

If it for the blood thing then... psst . I love to do it, and everyday i think about it, so i stay away from any opportunity of it happening.

Wanting to have sex with a virgin or NOT wanting to have sex with a virgin is 80% self-image related. Say what you will about the various issues dealing with virgins, the one common factor is impression. No matter what anyone says, unless they were strung out on something or drunk or abused as a very young child, so long as they were conscious EVERYone remembers their first time. To be someone's first is almost a guarantee that you'll be remembered in some way, shape, or form. Whether they admit it consciously or not, that's important validation for most people.

Not everybody wants that kind of validation, of course. You could just as easily make a case for not wanting to be with a virgin for fear that you'll screw it up and be remembered in a poor light. Some people don't want the burden of being remembered at all, they just want a fun screw.

At any rate, there are a lot of reasons why people do or don't want to be with a virgin, male or female. It's rarely physicality that's the deciding factor.

I prefer virgins. they're inexperienced, that'd mean I can do some "uncommon" stuffs without she complaining much about it.

^this

No more , no less.

Im curious what you mean by a virgin girl can be more slutty. Some peoples definitions of a slut vary. I'm not attacking your point I just want to better understand what your saying. Also I was wondering if you do have any advice for a virgin based on your comment about love vs. hormones. I'm a virgin and I know I have some crazy hormones going on. Its true I really can't tell, any advice with that?



On the point of virgins, I don't really care. Im not gonna lie it would be nice to be with someone more experience to help guide you and hopefully make things less awkward. In the end though I just want to be with someone I deeply care about and who cares about me, and thats the most important element.

Well you see, due to what I believe may be peoples own insecurities in this thread, they are unknowingly linking the words slut and variations of virgins, albeit not in text for text context, which is why it is only a suspicion of mine.

You see, this was a really simple thread. A yes or no question, followed by maybe a quick explanation. Of course that's too hard to do with some of the current fakku user base to do without directly or indirectly insulting another group of persons.

Example (Neutral based):





Example (non-neutral based):

Can't see how having an opinion based on experience is insulting to anyone.

I'll just suppose that I fall in the "non-neutral" category, as I prefer non-virgins. In my experience the virgins I've slept with have been bad in bed, thus I prefer non-virgins. It was a quick explanation on my preferences based on my own experience.

And how is it insulting to call a virgin bad in bed? A virgin has no experience of sex whatsoever, so it's not very surprising that they'll be bad, few people are good at stuff they've never tired.

You can state an opinion without attacking people. This isn't elementary school now.

Let's take this quote for an example:


Tell me where the necessity in that statement was, or the logic for that matter? There was no need to add an insult like that at the end of that reply. So he's saying all virgins are childish and immature? How is that in any way factual. It's not, that's how. When I make a post, I look at what I write from my own and from a third persons POV. Don't think I make random accusations and bullshit pulled out my ass.



If that was the case I would've quoted you too, but I didn't, did I?

-------------------------

Reading over my post, it's sounds rather hostile. I assure you it's not and meant to be taken calmly.

I can agree that Cnumbers-something's way of putting it was a bit unnecessary and was thinking more of Fi's post as it was pretty much the same thing I said, I don't really find it insulting. I too think virgins are troublesome because of my experience with them; because they don't know what to do without me telling them and so on. As I said it's an obvious reason for that but even so it doesn't make it less annoying.



True but you did put a:

that you never elaborated after my first post, where I posted my opinion on the matter so you could just as well have quoted me.

(At least I'll assume that it was directed at me, seeing as it was directly after my post and no quotes to define anyone else.)

Can't say I prefer 'em, can't say I hate 'em. To be honest, I'd prefer my first sexual encounter to be with another virgin. I think the experience would be a lot more memorable if we both make new discoveries. After that... As I said, no preference. Does it matter all that much?

That's because the word troublesome was taken in differently by both of us, as it could have been used differently depending on the situation.



That's because I was personally dissatisfied with it, but stil found it to be within neutrality, which is why I left it alone after expressing my personal distaste.