Long post imminent:
Well their
newest release has some watermarks here and there, so I believe they went with the poll results. I'm curious as to why the translation team decided to take them off in the first place - the team members were generally against it. Were there some vocal complaints somewhere?
Anyway I say keep them, for a few reasons: First, they help identify the translation group. It's useful to trace a translation back to the source - I might notice a doujin page somewhere, google the watermark, thereby reaching the translators' site where I can download the whole doujin. Second, they bring traffic to Fakku, which means ad clicks, which means more funds for maintenance costs. In the long run, this also helps to cement Fakku's status as the best, free, web 2.0 hentai site online, killing off the many paysites out there. Third, it's harder (but not impossible) to remove a watermark than to delete a credits page, thus preventing aforementioned paysites to profit from our translators' selfless work.
As for the criticisms against watermarks: I've always considered Fakku's watermarks to be relatively non-obtrusive, as compared to other translators. Also, regarding the argument that the translator has no claim to the artists' work, it's kind of a moot point because distributing the files digitally is by far the greater crime, and if you have something against that, why are you even on this site? (That's not to say I believe that we should rip off the hentai industry; if you have the means to, support it with purchases)