Who Is More Attractive?
Who Is More Attractive?
2
softbanker wrote...
Fictional or not a real man would never say that he would have sex with another man or even a fictional man. Fiction mirrors a person's fantasy and those a person creates a fictional world like anime, doujins or movies from which it takes its physical form. And by this a person manifest his thoughts, feelings and maybe urge or fetishes and that my friend is real. If you think that I'm wrong to say that its wrong for a real man to have fetish or fantasy from a fictional trap character then why not try asking a friend or two and see what they would think about you. Just say that your gay and you'll have my full support. I have some gay friends so I will understand.This is a false dilemma. You're putting the male population into two boxes, labelled "straight" and "gay". Furthermore, you're saying that being in the former box is a requisite for being a "real man", a highly subjective term. You're also saying that wanting to have sex with a man — even just one — puts one in the latter box. This is a worldview I highly disagree with.
Let me inform you about a thing called the Kinsey scale. The gist of it is: 0 means exclusive heterosexuality, 6 means exclusive homosexuality, everything in between is varying degrees of bisexuality. An additional grade, X, means asexuality. While not taking into account such things as percieved gender versus physical gender (which is the heart of the conflict here), it is still more adequate than putting people into two cleanly divided populations.
As for "real man", everyone has a different perception of what the term means. You are of the opinion that being heterosexual is a requirement. It isn't. A homosexual can be just as "manly" as a heterosexual.
tl;dr: The world ain't black and white, stop seeing it as such.
0
softbanker wrote...
Fictional or not a real man would never say that he would have sex with another man or even a fictional man. Fiction mirrors a person's fantasy and those a person creates a fictional world like anime, doujins or movies from which it takes its physical form. And by this a person manifest his thoughts, feelings and maybe urge or fetishes and that my friend is real. If you think that I'm wrong to say that its wrong for a real man to have fetish or fantasy from a fictional trap character then why not try asking a friend or two and see what they would think about you. Just say that your gay and you'll have my full support. I have some gay friends so I will understand.Also, Ami, because I want to be a real man, or else I'll be stoned to death in the streets of manliness.
0
Nauma wrote...
softbanker wrote...
Fictional or not a real man would never say that he would have sex with another man or even a fictional man. Fiction mirrors a person's fantasy and those a person creates a fictional world like anime, doujins or movies from which it takes its physical form. And by this a person manifest his thoughts, feelings and maybe urge or fetishes and that my friend is real. If you think that I'm wrong to say that its wrong for a real man to have fetish or fantasy from a fictional trap character then why not try asking a friend or two and see what they would think about you. Just say that your gay and you'll have my full support. I have some gay friends so I will understand.This is a false dilemma. You're putting the male population into two boxes, labelled "straight" and "gay". Furthermore, you're saying that being in the former box is a requisite for being a "real man", a highly subjective term. You're also saying that wanting to have sex with a man — even just one — puts one in the latter box. This is a worldview I highly disagree with.
Let me inform you about a thing called the Kinsey scale. The gist of it is: 0 means exclusive heterosexuality, 6 means exclusive homosexuality, everything in between is varying degrees of bisexuality. An additional grade, X, means asexuality. While not taking into account such things as percieved gender versus physical gender (which is the heart of the conflict here), it is still more adequate than putting people into two cleanly divided populations.
As for "real man", everyone has a different perception of what the term means. You are of the opinion that being heterosexual is a requirement. It isn't. A homosexual can be just as "manly" as a heterosexual.
tl;dr: The world ain't black and white, stop seeing it as such.
Wow I never knew there was a scale in measuring gayness. Here's my term of scale I call it "How much gay are you" scale. So-so gay, Gay, super gay, uber gay, the gayest and the gaylord. Which one are you?
0
softbanker wrote...
Nauma wrote...
softbanker wrote...
Fictional or not a real man would never say that he would have sex with another man or even a fictional man. Fiction mirrors a person's fantasy and those a person creates a fictional world like anime, doujins or movies from which it takes its physical form. And by this a person manifest his thoughts, feelings and maybe urge or fetishes and that my friend is real. If you think that I'm wrong to say that its wrong for a real man to have fetish or fantasy from a fictional trap character then why not try asking a friend or two and see what they would think about you. Just say that your gay and you'll have my full support. I have some gay friends so I will understand.This is a false dilemma. You're putting the male population into two boxes, labelled "straight" and "gay". Furthermore, you're saying that being in the former box is a requisite for being a "real man", a highly subjective term. You're also saying that wanting to have sex with a man — even just one — puts one in the latter box. This is a worldview I highly disagree with.
Let me inform you about a thing called the Kinsey scale. The gist of it is: 0 means exclusive heterosexuality, 6 means exclusive homosexuality, everything in between is varying degrees of bisexuality. An additional grade, X, means asexuality. While not taking into account such things as percieved gender versus physical gender (which is the heart of the conflict here), it is still more adequate than putting people into two cleanly divided populations.
As for "real man", everyone has a different perception of what the term means. You are of the opinion that being heterosexual is a requirement. It isn't. A homosexual can be just as "manly" as a heterosexual.
tl;dr: The world ain't black and white, stop seeing it as such.
Wow I never knew there was a scale in measuring gayness. Here's my term of scale I call it "How much gay are you" scale. So-so gay, Gay, super gay, uber gay, the gayest and the gaylord. Which one are you?
Now you are just being childish. Stop that.
-1
Nauma wrote...
softbanker wrote...
Nauma wrote...
softbanker wrote...
Fictional or not a real man would never say that he would have sex with another man or even a fictional man. Fiction mirrors a person's fantasy and those a person creates a fictional world like anime, doujins or movies from which it takes its physical form. And by this a person manifest his thoughts, feelings and maybe urge or fetishes and that my friend is real. If you think that I'm wrong to say that its wrong for a real man to have fetish or fantasy from a fictional trap character then why not try asking a friend or two and see what they would think about you. Just say that your gay and you'll have my full support. I have some gay friends so I will understand.This is a false dilemma. You're putting the male population into two boxes, labelled "straight" and "gay". Furthermore, you're saying that being in the former box is a requisite for being a "real man", a highly subjective term. You're also saying that wanting to have sex with a man — even just one — puts one in the latter box. This is a worldview I highly disagree with.
Let me inform you about a thing called the Kinsey scale. The gist of it is: 0 means exclusive heterosexuality, 6 means exclusive homosexuality, everything in between is varying degrees of bisexuality. An additional grade, X, means asexuality. While not taking into account such things as percieved gender versus physical gender (which is the heart of the conflict here), it is still more adequate than putting people into two cleanly divided populations.
As for "real man", everyone has a different perception of what the term means. You are of the opinion that being heterosexual is a requirement. It isn't. A homosexual can be just as "manly" as a heterosexual.
tl;dr: The world ain't black and white, stop seeing it as such.
Wow I never knew there was a scale in measuring gayness. Here's my term of scale I call it "How much gay are you" scale. So-so gay, Gay, super gay, uber gay, the gayest and the gaylord. Which one are you?
Now you are just being childish. Stop that.
Sure, I never liked arguing with gays. I always end up paying for their treatment bills. I do feel sorry though coz blood stains ruins my shirt.
0
I can heal AIDS wrote...
softbanker wrote...
Fictional or not a real man would never say that he would have sex with another man or even a fictional man. Fiction mirrors a person's fantasy and those a person creates a fictional world like anime, doujins or movies from which it takes its physical form. And by this a person manifest his thoughts, feelings and maybe urge or fetishes and that my friend is real. If you think that I'm wrong to say that its wrong for a real man to have fetish or fantasy from a fictional trap character then why not try asking a friend or two and see what they would think about you. Just say that your gay and you'll have my full support. I have some gay friends so I will understand.Also, Ami, because I want to be a real man, or else I'll be stoned to death in the streets of manliness.
I laughed heartily.
softbanker wrote...
Nauma wrote...
softbanker wrote...
Nauma wrote...
softbanker wrote...
Fictional or not a real man would never say that he would have sex with another man or even a fictional man. Fiction mirrors a person's fantasy and those a person creates a fictional world like anime, doujins or movies from which it takes its physical form. And by this a person manifest his thoughts, feelings and maybe urge or fetishes and that my friend is real. If you think that I'm wrong to say that its wrong for a real man to have fetish or fantasy from a fictional trap character then why not try asking a friend or two and see what they would think about you. Just say that your gay and you'll have my full support. I have some gay friends so I will understand.This is a false dilemma. You're putting the male population into two boxes, labelled "straight" and "gay". Furthermore, you're saying that being in the former box is a requisite for being a "real man", a highly subjective term. You're also saying that wanting to have sex with a man — even just one — puts one in the latter box. This is a worldview I highly disagree with.
Let me inform you about a thing called the Kinsey scale. The gist of it is: 0 means exclusive heterosexuality, 6 means exclusive homosexuality, everything in between is varying degrees of bisexuality. An additional grade, X, means asexuality. While not taking into account such things as percieved gender versus physical gender (which is the heart of the conflict here), it is still more adequate than putting people into two cleanly divided populations.
As for "real man", everyone has a different perception of what the term means. You are of the opinion that being heterosexual is a requirement. It isn't. A homosexual can be just as "manly" as a heterosexual.
tl;dr: The world ain't black and white, stop seeing it as such.
Wow I never knew there was a scale in measuring gayness. Here's my term of scale I call it "How much gay are you" scale. So-so gay, Gay, super gay, uber gay, the gayest and the gaylord. Which one are you?
Now you are just being childish. Stop that.
Sure, I never liked arguing with gays. I always end up paying for their treatment bills. I do feel sorry though coz blood stains ruins my shirt.
Is that a death threat, or are you attempting to say that you're so cool I'll kill myself? Either way, it is now painfully clear that you cannot refute my arguments, and have nothing to offer me but childish retorts. I will now stop responding to your posts, thus putting an end to this waste of time. Have a nice day.
0
Mike
Stand
softbanker wrote...
Sure, I never liked arguing with gays. I always end up paying for their treatment bills. I do feel sorry though coz blood stains ruins my shirt.Just lol.
0
Nauma wrote...
I laughed heartily.
Now you are just being childish. Stop that.
Is that a death threat, or are you attempting to say that you're so cool I'll kill myself? Either way, it is now painfully clear that you cannot refute my arguments, and have nothing to offer me but childish retorts. I will now stop responding to your posts, thus putting an end to this waste of time. Have a nice day.
What's there to argue? On how gay a man can be? Copying and pasting info from wiki doesn't make you a winner in this so called argument.
I'm sorry that my last post scares you to think that its a death threat. Geez And its never cool to talk about gayness dude. My friends would smash my face if ever they hear me talking about it and I will smash their face too if one of them talks about it. Oh yeah it's a MAN's thing so you wouldn't understand.
0
Nauma wrote...
softbanker wrote...
*words*Now you are just being childish. Stop that.
Calm down, Nauma. You're falling for the troll.
0
Ami has that sensual aura about her from time to time. I've always thought the 'princess' types are more attractive anyway. Mariya is a trap, though HE's funny. :D
0
ZeroOBK wrote...
Nauma wrote...
softbanker wrote...
*words*Now you are just being childish. Stop that.
Calm down, Nauma. You're falling for the troll.
Thats not fair. I only posted my opinion and he disagreed with it then posted some gay scale and stuff about gayness, I just replied to it. Gezz man replying to a post meant for me is considered trolling? o_O. Anyway.. ok ok I'm going now. Sorry for all the ruckus. Peace v(^_^)v
0
I lol'd at a lot of that trolls posts. Trying to be all GAR when he has thought of men as women before. What's attractive is attractive. You can't dispute that. If you are attracted to something i.e. trap that's fine. It's a guy that looks hotter then most females irl do. Would I have sex with Mariya? As Mike said yes. Would I have sex with a real life dude that looked like a girl? No.
0
animeholic1 wrote...
I lol'd at a lot of that trolls posts. Trying to be all GAR when he has thought of men as women before. What's attractive is attractive. You can't dispute that. If you are attracted to something i.e. trap that's fine. It's a guy that looks hotter then most females irl do. Would I have sex with Mariya? As Mike said yes. Would I have sex with a real life dude that looked like a girl? No.Sisters unite! fight-o!
0
What the crap Marya looks so much like a girl but then again I love girls and
GIRLS ONLY YEAH AMI for me luckly you spoke of this trap thing *phew*
GIRLS ONLY YEAH AMI for me luckly you spoke of this trap thing *phew*