Abortion
In your perspective and values, do you think abortion is wrong?
0
Quoted by Raoin:
I'm glad you see it fit to answer for other people.
Your opinion now contradicts the logic given above
If a person is NOT alive, how can I have intend to kill him/her?
According to your above statement,
The mother is guilty of murder by her own intentions when choosing abortion.
It seems we can agree on this after all.
Well... first of all the big difference here is its against the mothers will, and the obvious intentions of the perpetrator. It could be argued that aborting the child against the mothers will in the first trimester isn't murder. It may not be murder but it may as well been due to his intentions.
I'm glad you see it fit to answer for other people.
Your opinion now contradicts the logic given above
If a person is NOT alive, how can I have intend to kill him/her?
According to your above statement,
The mother is guilty of murder by her own intentions when choosing abortion.
It seems we can agree on this after all.
0
I'm glad you see it fit to answer for other people.
Your opinion now contradicts the logic given above
If a person is NOT alive, how can I have intend to kill him/her?
According to your above statement,
The mother is guilty of murder by her own intentions when choosing abortion.
It seems we can agree on this after all.
First reread the last sentence.
Second she is not guilty because the baby is part of the mother, as I've stated many times in this discussion.
0
[quote="Raoin"]
First reread the last sentence.
Second she is not guilty because the baby is part of the mother, as I've stated many times in this discussion.
Reread the last sentence? That's precisely what Minsc did.
In this scenario, both a killer and mother has the same intentions.
To get rid of the unborn baby.
So if I have a siamese twin, it's OKAY to kill him-her? It's part of me.
First reread the last sentence.
Second she is not guilty because the baby is part of the mother, as I've stated many times in this discussion.
Reread the last sentence? That's precisely what Minsc did.
In this scenario, both a killer and mother has the same intentions.
To get rid of the unborn baby.
she is not guilty because the baby is part of the mother
So if I have a siamese twin, it's OKAY to kill him-her? It's part of me.
0
Minsc wrote...
[quote="Raoin"]First reread the last sentence.
Second she is not guilty because the baby is part of the mother, as I've stated many times in this discussion.
Reread the last sentence? That's precisely what Minsc did.
In this scenario, both a killer and mother has the same intentions.
To get rid of the unborn baby.
If the baby is part of the mother its more like suicide...
I'm saying that a mother has freedom to do what she wants with her body and that baby is fully linked to her and essentially part of her.
Also I meant reread the post you quoted as it was edited.
Siamese twins are linked in a similar scenario, but the twins are fully reliant on each other not one on the other.
Considering if one was fully dependent on the other, I would say perhaps. In a uniform manner like abortions are done.
0
If the baby is part of the mother its more like suicide...
POINT PROVEN.
Suicide is illegal, and since you stated abortion is equivalent to suicide..
Case closed.
0
Minsc wrote...
If the baby is part of the mother its more like suicide...
POINT PROVEN.
Suicide is illegal, and since you stated abortion is equivalent to suicide..
Case closed.
Who said I believed suicide should be illegal? Law doesn't constitute my opinion.
For example: ABORTION IS LEGAL, meaning you agree that it should be legal...
Also, it serves as an example that murder is different then suicide. Its not exactly suicide either I just said more like.
I also ask that you stop finding one point in my arguments to exploit, consider the statement where I said that its debatable and these lines are chosen to be most beneficial to everyone as a whole/in America. They shouldn't go by your absolutist values where one law or value should be consistent with all cases, like saying killing in self defense is still killing.
Also read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_views_of_suicide It is essentially not illegal to commit suicide, only to assist.
0
Raoin wrote...
Who said I believed suicide should be illegal? Law doesn't constitute my opinion.
For example: ABORTION IS LEGAL, meaning you agree that it should be legal...
Firstly:
You still haven't stated if your for or against suicide.
Secondly:
As stated, suicide is a crime. You compared a crime with abortion.
And if you admit that you support suicide, that your opinion of a widely viewed crime should be legal, then it shows lack of support for your abortion argument.
EX:
"I think all drugs should be legal. (Especially crack and heroine)"
"I think abortion should remain legal."
Just based on the first statement, it shows how dumbfounded my opinions would be, if I said this, how they go against moral belief of entire nations, and why should anyone listen to my second opinion.
Call it a stereotype if you want. But typically, if a person supports crime, they lack morals, in which have very little basis to say what should be and shouldn't be LEGALIZED.
Don't run for government anytime soon.
Also read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_views_of_suicide It is essentially not illegal to commit suicide, only to assist.
I understand you have opinions, but please refrain from mixing them with facts. Suicide is, indeed illegal, and it's not up for debate.
It's the LAW, folks.
0
Firstly:
You still haven't stated if your for or against suicide.
I am fine with suicide and self mutilation, penalties should exist as its not healthy to do, like for example the price and requirements placed on abortion. Thought the penalties should obviously be different, as one is unhealthy towards ones wellbeing while the other one isn't healthy when considering keeping the species populated.You still haven't stated if your for or against suicide.
Secondly:
As stated, suicide is a crime. You compared a crime with abortion.
And if you admit that you support suicide, that your opinion of a widely viewed crime should be legal, then it shows lack of support for your abortion argument.
Actually if you read the link, "In the United States, suicide has never been punished as a crime" Hardly constitutes a widely viewed crime. As stated, suicide is a crime. You compared a crime with abortion.
And if you admit that you support suicide, that your opinion of a widely viewed crime should be legal, then it shows lack of support for your abortion argument.
EX:
"I think all drugs should be legal. (Especially crack and heroine)"
"I think abortion should remain legal."
Just based on the first statement, it shows how dumbfounded my opinions would be, if I said this, how they go against moral belief of entire nations, and why should anyone listen to my second opinion.
Call it a stereotype if you want. But typically, if a person supports crime, they lack morals, in which have very little basis to say what should be and shouldn't be LEGALIZED.
Don't run for government anytime soon.
I along with quite a few nations believe that drugs should be legal to use but not to distribute, also suicide can hardly compared to drugs. K so whats your justification that this stereotype applies here? "I think all drugs should be legal. (Especially crack and heroine)"
"I think abortion should remain legal."
Just based on the first statement, it shows how dumbfounded my opinions would be, if I said this, how they go against moral belief of entire nations, and why should anyone listen to my second opinion.
Call it a stereotype if you want. But typically, if a person supports crime, they lack morals, in which have very little basis to say what should be and shouldn't be LEGALIZED.
Don't run for government anytime soon.
I understand you have opinions, but please refrain from mixing them with facts. Suicide is, indeed illegal, and it's not up for debate.
It's the LAW, folks.
Its law, but its hardly enforced, its a common law from Old England, your not going to jail for attempts on suicide, its only in cases where your mentally unhealthy that any action is taken(still not a crime), which makes up most of them... except perhaps abortion if it can be considered as such. Because the mother is trying to consider her future, alive and as healthy as possible.
Also read please: "By the early 1990s only two US states still listed suicide as a crime, and these have since removed that classification. In some U.S. states, suicide is still considered an unwritten "common law crime," that is, a crime based on the law of old England as stated in Blackstone's Commentaries"
0
This folks, is why you should not use a quick Google search when attempting to look up laws.
I can clearly see where your misconception derived from. And it's a lack of research/understanding on your part, so I can fully hold you against it.
They punish attempted suicide. It's an enforced LAW.
The reason they do not punish successful SUICIDE, is because the individual, who commits the crime, is already dead. There would be no 'justified' way to punish the person, and hence, it makes no sense to keep successful SUICIDE as a punishable law.
Google has failed you, my friend.
But there is HOPE after all!
If the mother kills herself after the abortion, your logic could be valid.
I can clearly see where your misconception derived from. And it's a lack of research/understanding on your part, so I can fully hold you against it.
They punish attempted suicide. It's an enforced LAW.
The reason they do not punish successful SUICIDE, is because the individual, who commits the crime, is already dead. There would be no 'justified' way to punish the person, and hence, it makes no sense to keep successful SUICIDE as a punishable law.
Google has failed you, my friend.
But there is HOPE after all!
If the mother kills herself after the abortion, your logic could be valid.
0
Minsc wrote...
This folks, is why you should not use a quick Google search when attempting to look up laws.I can clearly see where your misconception derived from. And it's a lack of research/understanding on your part, so I can fully hold you against it.
They punish attempted suicide. It's an enforced LAW.
The reason they do not punish successful SUICIDE, is because the individual, who commits the crime, is already dead. There would be no 'justified' way to punish the person, and hence, it makes no sense to keep successful SUICIDE as a punishable law.
Google has failed you, my friend.
But there is HOPE after all!
If the mother kills herself after the abortion, your logic could be valid.
No read the link, it includes attempted suicide. Also its great that you continue to find one point and ignore all the rest... its really awsome.
How many people do you know have gone to jail for suicide?
I'm sure you have heard of those that go to asylums or institutes. That is not related to their "crime" but their mental health.
Read this if your still don't understand, it states more clearly: http://law.jrank.org/pages/2180/Suicide-Legal-Aspects.html
"Modern American attitudes toward punishing both suicide and attempted suicides are similar to those expressed in England. The English Suicide Act, 1961, 9 & 10 Eliz. 2, c. 60, s. 1, provides that suicide should no longer be deemed criminal."
0
Although the law has changed a bit, and specifically in America it's not technically illegal anymore: It's still enforced. (Shown by examples)
I could list thousands of links to people charged with attempted suicide:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060830112858AAeFzsx
http://www.constitutional-law.net/charterexam97.html
http://www.myjoyonline.com/news/200709/8293.asp
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,808139,00.html
http://www.fgbmfi-adelnth.org/trans.html
http://www.usgennet.org/usa/ny/state/police/ch23pt1.html
Do you think these people can look up WIKI and say:
"Hey, this web-page says it's not a crime. I want restitution!"
I admit, not everyone goes to jail for it. They can arrest you, or lock you up, or just give you care. Depending on the situation.
I could list thousands of links to people charged with attempted suicide:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060830112858AAeFzsx
http://www.constitutional-law.net/charterexam97.html
http://www.myjoyonline.com/news/200709/8293.asp
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,808139,00.html
http://www.fgbmfi-adelnth.org/trans.html
http://www.usgennet.org/usa/ny/state/police/ch23pt1.html
Do you think these people can look up WIKI and say:
"Hey, this web-page says it's not a crime. I want restitution!"
I admit, not everyone goes to jail for it. They can arrest you, or lock you up, or just give you care. Depending on the situation.
0
Minsc wrote...
Although the law has changed a bit, and specifically in America it's not technically illegal anymore: It's still enforced. (Shown by examples)I could list thousands of links to people charged with attempted suicide:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060830112858AAeFzsx
http://www.constitutional-law.net/charterexam97.html
http://www.myjoyonline.com/news/200709/8293.asp
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,808139,00.html
http://www.fgbmfi-adelnth.org/trans.html
http://www.usgennet.org/usa/ny/state/police/ch23pt1.html
Do you think these people can look up WIKI and say:
"Hey, this web-page says it's not a crime. I want restitution!"
I admit, not everyone goes to jail for it. They can arrest you, or lock you up, or just give you care. Depending on the situation.
It depends on what state and other related factors, the majority are in the view point I have suggested however.
All states no longer list it as a law, but some use the common law variant and its still a minority.
Many of those links support this, and some of them are outdated or simply totally unreliable. Lol I liked the link to a forum post. The law did and does exist to a lesser extent I never denied this, just that it wasn't a commonly supported law and it was a changing law.
0
1. At least we agree on one thing: assisting with SUICIDE / assisting with ATTEMPTED SUICIDE is a crime. You've still compared abortion to SUICIDE.
This means, that if, suicide is not illegal where you are from, then there is a good chance that aiding in suicide still is.
And since in your logic: The mother and the baby are the same person.
Should we charge doctors/nurses, and anyone else in the decision process... for aiding in Mother's suicide instead?
This means, that if, suicide is not illegal where you are from, then there is a good chance that aiding in suicide still is.
And since in your logic: The mother and the baby are the same person.
Should we charge doctors/nurses, and anyone else in the decision process... for aiding in Mother's suicide instead?
0
Minsc wrote...
1. At least we agree on one thing: assisting with SUICIDE / assisting with ATTEMPTED SUICIDE is a crime. You've still compared abortion to SUICIDE.This means, that if, suicide is not illegal where you are from, then there is a good chance that aiding in suicide still is.
And since in your logic: The mother and the baby are the same person.
Should we charge doctors/nurses, and anyone else in the decision process... for aiding in Mother's suicide instead?
Frankly I would consider abortion closer to self mutilation(Don't bug me about it I said abortion was closer to suicide then murder, now I say more like self mutilation then suicide) because the host is still alive to say that she was willing. I'm not sure of the laws related to assisting self mutilation or confirmed assisting suicide, but I am fine with that... the main reason (for me anywayz) against assisting suicide is that it cannot be proven. I confirm that it is pretty illegal though.
The main difference between suicide/self mutilation and this however is that it actually is beneficial to the mother depending on the context, which is why I would compare the "suicide" or "self mutilation" relation to any surgery.
0
Frankly I would consider abortion closer to self mutilation(Don't bug me about it I said abortion was closer to suicide then murder, now I say more like self mutilation then suicide) because the host is still alive to say that she was willing. I'm not sure of the laws related to assisting self mutilation or confirmed assisting suicide, but I am fine with that... the main reason (for me anywayz) against assisting suicide is that it cannot be proven. I confirm that it is pretty illegal though.
The main difference between suicide/self mutilation and this however is that it actually is beneficial to the mother depending on the context, which is why I would compare the "suicide" or "self mutilation" relation to any surgery.
Closing up the suicide argument:
Minsc appreciates the other point of view on the suicide subject. Surprisingly, a lot of nations lack "suicide"-laws, as you've stated, even though, cases are still enforced where laws apparently don't exist, people are still locked-up for it, yet Minsc does not stand on solid grounds with a criminal declaration for suicide.
The point was not to discuss laws and common laws, but rather: The comparison with suicide/abortion was logically flawed. Minsc made that point clearly, but you also made your point when it comes to the illegal technicalities of SUICIDE.
Back on abortion:


The unborn are not real people, so these pictures shouldn't bother you.
0
Disturbing images don't take away from the logical and rational reasons behind abortion.
They only to service disrupt people that are easily shaken/never had experience with the subject to begin with.
I liked your old avatar more btw =[
Also, this goes back to the "real people" argument and I've stated that a baby before 15 weeks isn't conscious and thus doesn't desire to live or not to feel pain... pretty much just like a dead person.
They only to service disrupt people that are easily shaken/never had experience with the subject to begin with.
I liked your old avatar more btw =[
Also, this goes back to the "real people" argument and I've stated that a baby before 15 weeks isn't conscious and thus doesn't desire to live or not to feel pain... pretty much just like a dead person.
0
Raoin wrote...
Disturbing images don't take away from the logical and rational reasons behind abortion.They only to service disrupt people that are easily shaken/never had experience with the subject to begin with.
I liked your old avatar more btw =[
Well, perhaps you should ask yourself why, the images are disturbing?

No intention to disrupt people, but sometimes photos explain better than words.
Boo likes the old avatar better too,
But 'tis time that Minsc goes back to being Minsc, and not Clare.
0
Many things are disturbing that are beneficial, surgeries generally look brutal and most can't stomach them.
Also pictures display the emotional aspects better then the logical ones.
Also pictures display the emotional aspects better then the logical ones.
0
Raoin wrote...
Many things are disturbing that are beneficial, surgeries generally look brutal and most can't stomach them.Boo thinks... brutal and disturbing is two completely different things.
0
Minsc wrote...
Raoin wrote...
Many things are disturbing that are beneficial, surgeries generally look brutal and most can't stomach them.Boo thinks... brutal and disturbing is two completely different things.
Brutal things can be disturbing, was just trying to give more terms and not sound redundant.
I don't want to argue semantics.
Who is Boo and who is Clare? Do you have multiple personalities?