Should we have a bloody revolt against our governrment?

Simple, put them into an "accident".



Perhaps the world need to taste a little from a nuclear war then....So we can really start anything a new, well, with less people..

There's a difference because "other" forms of currency/money don't have interest, bonds or a thing called credit.

agreed.

It really depends if you NEED a revolution. Doing a revolt every 10 years when ure government is fine and fair and up to the current era is just plain stupid and may make the government worse.

Why? Just the fact that you're allowed to talk about "revolution" openly should automatically tell you how free of a society we live in.

I can't see any logical reason why we should take up arms, and kill for the sake of nothing. Another thing on my mind is, that the goverment sometimes hides or alters things for our own good. A HUGE amount of people couldn't comprehend the fact that aliens exist or have already contacted us (a good possibility)....Just an example

It depends from country to country, for example here in mexico, we're becoming another somalia, the criminals do their walks trought the city, nothing happens when the police see them, but if someone doesn't like that... that someone suddenly dissapears, and will be never found by anyone, the people in the politics are just fapping like crazy monkeys in the goverment palace, allmost all te people suffers hunger, lack of education, poverty, lack of security everywhere, actually at this moment a gang of sons of a b**** set in fire a casino, killing allmost half of the people inside, is in case like this, when there are only two solutions:
1.- start a revolt agaisnt the goverment questioning them about the "results" of their mandate or
2.- or a "coup d'etat" by military
accordin to what i learned in school those are the only solutions for a situation like somalia, mexico, etc... against extreme problems we need extreme solutions

1). The current poverty rate in the United States is at 12% give of take. Not fantastic but, if could be worse. Until you take into account that the poverty rate in the United States is based on 1969 standards of living. Updating the poverty line for economic growth since 1969 would yield a 2010 poverty line of $45,736 for a family of four. A family of four living on less than $45,736 today is just as poor -- relative to the country as a whole -- as a family in poverty was in 1969 when the current line was set. By that standard, about 28% of American families of four are now living in poverty, twice the official poverty rate. If that sounds high, it's only because we are much more miserly today than our grandparents were in 1969.

2). The United States finished 2009 with a debt-to-GDP ratio of 85%, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The 90% level has become the IMF's make-or-break point for countries hoping to grow their way out of debt. If the government debt load climbs above 90% of GDP, economic growth slows so much that growth is no longer a viable solution for reducing that debt, and the IMF insists on austerity measures. The current standing in 2011 is at 92%.

3). Declining Civil Rights. In America, private discussions and movements are monitored.free speech is corralled. the freedom to assemble for protest is by Government decree. Then anyone who questions or challenges the system are labeled as you.terrorists, pedophiles or whatever else they can slap you with to demonize and disgrace

4). America's crumbling infastructure



5.Disappearing middle class: During the last presidential debate season, they argued that a family income of $250K was solidly middle-class. Well,Census data shows less than 15% of families make over $100K, and only 1.5% of families make over $250K. The income gap between the rich and poor has increased at a staggering pace, while many more middle-class folks join the ranks of the poor every day. Cavernous income gaps may be what Third-World nations are best known for.

6. Devalued currency: The value of the Federal Reserve Note (U.S. dollar) has declined 96% since the inception of the Rederal Reserve in 1913

7. Controlling the media: A government-influenced media that censors information is a key component of Third World countries. In some countries it is openly owned by the State. In America, privately-owned major media is not as balanced or as diverse as it seems; the concentration of ownership has led to
censorship when national and corporate interests have sometimes overlapped. The persecution of high-profile investigative journalists such as WikiLeaks is set amid a backdrop of the proposed Internet censorship of bloggers who wish to remain anonymous. The end of net neutrality creates a pay-to-play system that can lead to further corporate and government control of information and opinion.

Time to wake up Dorothy. You're not in Kansas anymore.

I dont believe violence would solve anything it might make things worse.

Don't worry, we don't need to have a revolution until 2027 when the new Deus Ex takes place. ;P

Yes - because governments will always retaliate with utmost brutality if someone challenges their legitimacy.

You just need to look a cop in the eye in a bad way and you get the baton.