Battlefield 4
0
If you ask me its too soon the last DLC is this March and not to mention I think they could make the game much better for console users if they wait on next gen consoles which might come out this year. Sure PC is far superior then consoles but depending on the specs of the next gen it might be possible to increase the amount of players at a time which I might like considering most of my gaming friends are on my console.
0
I will play the public beta. But I bet it will be just like bf3. All about the light fixtures and how bright the sun is. Though I hop eto hell they remove any kind of tint so it won't be gloomy.
0
AMVGFan wrote...
If you ask me its too soon the last DLC is this Marchanigu wrote...
Well, isn't this a little bit too soon? They haven't released all the DLCs for BF3 yet... Just because it promises you access to the beta doesn't mean the Beta is starting anytime soon, it's slated for the fall of 2013, at least eight months from now.
GamingNerd wrote...
I will play the public beta. But I bet it will be just like bf3. All about the light fixtures and how bright the sun is. Though I hop eto hell they remove any kind of tint so it won't be gloomy.There's a program out that removes the color tint (BF3 color changer IIRC), EA and Dice have already made a statement saying they won't ban people for using it.
Hildedge wrote...
Modern WarBattles 5I didn't realize Battlefield has been using the same engine for years. I didn't realize CoD had vehicular combat either, not to mention a focus on something other than CQB.
Platnumin wrote...
BowlOfMilk wrote...
I call bullshit, i thought Battlefield 2143 was the next one in the series.Also, 69:99 holy shit.
Looks like your claim of bullshit has been turned around, it's announced now! EA are going to become as greedy as Activision but with Battlefield, I can tell for sure.
And yes, 69.99 (£49.99) for a PC download. That just backs my point up even further ;P
There has been a 32.73% increase in inflation (Not counting 2012) since the release of Medal of Honor in 1999, I picked up the game for $59.99 (price tag is still on my box).
59.99 x 0.3273 = 19.634727
59.99 + 19.63 = 79.62
So consumers are paying almost $10 less for this version of Medal of Honor than they did for the original, and this version cost many more times the amount to produce. More for less? Sounds like a good deal to me. Seems like they haven't strayed too far from what the games are actually worth.
By the way, if you're going to point fingers and call names, you should at least do so towards the right company.
0
Narovka wrote...
GamingNerd wrote...
I will play the public beta. But I bet it will be just like bf3. All about the light fixtures and how bright the sun is. Though I hop eto hell they remove any kind of tint so it won't be gloomy.There's a program out that removes the color tint (BF3 color changer IIRC), EA and Dice have already made a statement saying they won't ban people for using it.
sadly I do not own the pc version of this game. I do hope the put in a better spawn protection then wait bf3 failed at. pissed me off way to much to see the enemy chopper camping our airfield for easy kills and the jets and helis raping our team before we can even leave spawn. Would also like to see well designed maps with objects obscuring spawn and multiple ways out of spawn. But I guess I will have to play bad company 2 for that.
0
Narovka wrote...
I didn't realize Battlefield has been using the same engine for years. I didn't realize CoD had vehicular combat either, not to mention a focus on something other than CQB.Not to sound like an enraged fan boy but CoD did have vehicular combat at one point in multiplayer which was World at War but yeah it wasnt as big as Battlefield.
0
deadsx
Lvl 99
I'm curios to see if for consoles they change they increase the amount of players or make maps specifically of them.
For instance, Metro was perfect for consoles, not so much pc, and on the other hand, Caspian Border while it looks great on PC, was a snore fest on console.
For instance, Metro was perfect for consoles, not so much pc, and on the other hand, Caspian Border while it looks great on PC, was a snore fest on console.
0
deadsx wrote...
I'm curios to see if for consoles they change they increase the amount of players or make maps specifically of them.For instance, Metro was perfect for consoles, not so much pc, and on the other hand, Caspian Border while it looks great on PC, was a snore fest on console.
I think Metro is great on PC (depending on the game mode), even with all the DLC it's still one of the most popular maps on servers. I doubt they'll increase the player limit on consoles unless BF4 is released after the 720 comes out.
0
I try to stay out of fps, but I have to admit this does look interesting (I'd probably only play story, but I still need to play Spec Opps too)
0
bakapink wrote...
Spoiler:
I try to stay out of fps, but I have to admit this does look interesting (I'd probably only play story, but I still need to play Spec Opps too)
THAT WAS EPIC!
0
So far it's confirmed to be available for the current gen consoles (PS3 and 360), and of course PC (which was what the 17 min video was played from) at the end of 2013. I had mixed feelings upon finding this out, for starters...
The Pros:
The Cons:
But regardless, I am so psyched for this game! Now if they had a dinosaur mode (similar to CoD Zombies) or even just a simple theater mode, like what Halo 3/ Black Ops implemented, I will be overjoyed- yet sad... cause chances are I'll be playing this for hours on end, rather than watching anime, playing eroge, or reading doujins. :[
Post Edit/ Addon
https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=91485&start=15
Oh my. So sorry. I was busy typing my post, I didn't see yours. >_
The Pros:
- It'll look great on the PC regardless (blockbuster movie quality for crying out loud)
- Scheduled to be released this Fall (2013).
- I don't have to save money to buy a next gen console to play it.
- Frostbit 3 engine; more destruction!
The Cons:
- No word on it ever being available for the next-gen consoles, especially the PS4, which is also is to be out at the end of this year (2013).
- Chance that console versions will be limited to the 12v12 multiplayer; unlike PC's grand scale of 32v32.
- My (console) hard drive is running out of space for large updates!
But regardless, I am so psyched for this game! Now if they had a dinosaur mode (similar to CoD Zombies) or even just a simple theater mode, like what Halo 3/ Black Ops implemented, I will be overjoyed- yet sad... cause chances are I'll be playing this for hours on end, rather than watching anime, playing eroge, or reading doujins. :[
Post Edit/ Addon
Hentanize wrote...
thread huzzahhttps://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=91485&start=15
Oh my. So sorry. I was busy typing my post, I didn't see yours. >_
0
Sure, the game looks great, and I understand this is no where near the final product, but there just doesn't seem to be that much innovation in the game. It's still SP, so it's still an on rails shooter, but some of the basics are still the same. I liked the explosions for the grenades, and the second sight for the AR, but it feels like they just added that from MH:W. I keep reading people who are being blown away by the graphics, but you can't just focus on that alone, the graphics being the soul reason why you would want to buy the game.
I've also learned my lesson after Aliens. I just can't bring myself to say that this is a good game when they only show what they wanted to show.
I've also learned my lesson after Aliens. I just can't bring myself to say that this is a good game when they only show what they wanted to show.
0
dragonsheart967 wrote...
Sure, the game looks great, and I understand this is no where near the final product, but there just doesn't seem to be that much innovation in the game. It's still SP, so it's still an on rails shooter, but some of the basics are still the same. I liked the explosions for the grenades, and the second sight for the AR, but it feels like they just added that from MH:W. I keep reading people who are being blown away by the graphics, but you can't just focus on that alone, the graphics being the soul reason why you would want to buy the game.I've also learned my lesson after Aliens. I just can't bring myself to say that this is a good game when they only show what they wanted to show.
For me, it's not so much the graphics or anything else. What I find, from the trailer, is something that I can be enthralled in. An action movie that will give me a "rush to play" kind of experience. They could have Boarderland graphics and I'd still find it fun (I think, this is assuming the whole game is like this trailer). Though of course I don't expect the story to hold the same novelty after the first play through, as well, I don't wish to support EA screwy business practices. So I'd most likely rent/used (30 under) it. My only interest is the experience of the story.