Call of Duty: Ghosts
0
TheQuanya wrote...
I'm so ready for this game, I'm hoping they put a mix of Ghost Protocol where you can use invisibility or something.If they do, hopefully it won't be as much of a joke where your gun will be floating in mid-air as if the damn thing was haunted.
0
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
>there was a big emphasis on the dog(s)
>the game is going for an emotional element
We all know what's going to happen to that dog. ;__________________________________;
>the game is going for an emotional element
We all know what's going to happen to that dog. ;__________________________________;
0
Definitely gonna wait for a gameplay trailer before I make up my mind. Though the emotional element is definitely interesting compared to the current run and gun installments.
0
Not the most cutting edge but improvements. Still will be a legion of people to bitch and moan about the smallest detail.
0
Kaimax
Best Master-San
Lol, the thread picture was changed to reflect the new "groundbreaking" feature. XD
Mans best friends will probably get shot/blown to smithereens.
Mans best friends will probably get shot/blown to smithereens.
0
Anyone notice that in one of the underwater shots, the guy's holding what appears to be an underwater assault rifle?
Going by what I could make out from it, it's that russian weapon that fires underwater, but instead of firing bullets, it shoots spears. No joke on that.
Hang on...this guy explains it in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw8uZ6fCDRc
Going by what I could make out from it, it's that russian weapon that fires underwater, but instead of firing bullets, it shoots spears. No joke on that.
Hang on...this guy explains it in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw8uZ6fCDRc
-1
The next game in this series is so next gen, look at this next gen image to truly see how next gen the NEW call of duty experience is
NEXT. GEN.
An actually reply: I stopped caring about COD since Call of Duty 4.
Ha.
Spoiler:
NEXT. GEN.
An actually reply: I stopped caring about COD since Call of Duty 4.
This user has received -1 reputation for this post.
Ha.
0
Peltor wrote...
Is this the one that boasts the new engine, so-called?I won't really call it a new engine since they just modified their previous engine.
0
This one actually looks somewhat interesting compared to the rest of the recent Call of Duty games. I still won't buy it though. Not because I hate Call of Duty, but because I don't want to spend my money on a game. There are better things I can spend $60 with.
0
Foreground Eclipse wrote...
This one actually looks somewhat interesting compared to the rest of the recent Call of Duty games. I still won't buy it though. Not because I hate Call of Duty, but because I don't want to spend my money on a game. There are better things I can spend $60 with.Steam can fix that.
OT: Personally, I loved the call of duty franchise. Though I only played COD4, Cod:WaW and a little bit of zombies for CoD: BO 1&2. Nothing innovative has really come out of the franchise since zombies were introduced.
0
kengenerals wrote...
Foreground Eclipse wrote...
This one actually looks somewhat interesting compared to the rest of the recent Call of Duty games. I still won't buy it though. Not because I hate Call of Duty, but because I don't want to spend my money on a game. There are better things I can spend $60 with.Steam can fix that.
I don't use Steam. The only game I own that is on Steam is Portal 2 because my PS3 copy came with a free PC copy. My computer isn't strong enough anymore.
0
Cormac wrote...
CoD and it's ilk are the cancer killing video games. Are they shit games? Yes. Are they going to kill the gaming industry? That's a tad bit extreme.
0
Narovka wrote...
Cormac wrote...
CoD and it's ilk are the cancer killing video games. Are they shit games? Yes. Are they going to kill the gaming industry? That's a tad bit extreme.
They embody, that when lowering standards to simply clone success, it's profitable. Shareholders/investors want more money not a (new) quality gaming experience, and they always get what they want. For quite awhile (game releases seem thinned out atm) many fps's attempted to beat CoD by being CoD, and they failed.
In the way that CoD spreads a desire for gaming companies to try to reproduce the same experience (game), an experience that's been the same since 4 and should die/end but doesn't, causing detriment and harm, I think the comparison is surprisingly accurate.
Cancer doesn't always kill the host, but it can hurt them, like F.E.A.R. 3, or Gears of War and CoD to Dead Space 3. CoD most likely won't kill the industry but I would say the mindset is crippling. (Forgive me, anyone who may find my subversive depiction of cancer insulting, I don't intend to offend by over simplifying.)
Note: Reason for last paragraph; You state that Cormac comment is wrong, by replying that CoD won't kill the industry, while Cormac only mentioned "...killing video games". So I figured your contemplating on the industry itself anyways.
0
bakapink wrote...
Narovka wrote...
Cormac wrote...
CoD and it's ilk are the cancer killing video games. Are they shit games? Yes. Are they going to kill the gaming industry? That's a tad bit extreme.
They embody, that when lowering standards to simply clone success, it's profitable. Shareholders/investors want more money not a (new) quality gaming experience, and they always get what they want. For quite awhile (game releases seem thinned out atm) many fps's attempted to beat CoD by being CoD, and they failed.
In the way that CoD spreads a desire for gaming companies to try to reproduce the same experience (game), an experience that's been the same since 4 and should die/end but doesn't, causing detriment and harm, I think the comparison is surprisingly accurate.
Cancer doesn't always kill the host, but it can hurt them, like F.E.A.R. 3, or Gears of War and CoD to Dead Space 3. CoD most likely won't kill the industry but I would say the mindset is crippling. (Forgive me, anyone who may find my subversive depiction of cancer insulting, I don't intend to offend by over simplifying.)
Note: Reason for last paragraph; You state that Cormac comment is wrong, by replying that CoD won't kill the industry, while Cormac only mentioned "...killing video games". So I figured your contemplating on the industry itself anyways.
So, if the quality of the primary product of an industry is being substantially lowered that doesn't lower the quality of the industry itself? I don't follow your logic there, I was referring in exact to the same thing Cormac was.
I'm well aware of why companies want to reproduce the Call of Duty gaming experience and why companies shy away from radical new ideas in fear of losing profit. That's just one side of the spectrum however. If all you ever look at is AAA releases of course you're going to be disappointed, and you're going to miss the majority of what's out there too.
The indie gaming market is larger and receiving more media attention than ever, and as people are starting to realize, you don't need a ridiculously large budget in order to make something great. Minecraft is a perfect example, same with DotA Allstars. As long as creativity lives within the minds of the incredibly steady influx of new game producers coming into the industry, we're always going to have something new and unique to try. If you're bored with the video games out there and you think games like CoD are killing the quality of the industry, it's your own fault for only looking at big budget games, which in reality account for a small portion of what's out there to experience.
